Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark A. Busch

dblp:24/4525 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › spatial representation
spatial memory
0.112007
A Robot in a Water Maze: Learning a Spatial Memory Task · ICRA 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal difference learning · 0.1self-organizing feature map · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 A Robot in a Water Maze: Learning a Spatial Memory Task
abstract
This paper explores several novel approaches to solve the Morris water maze task. In this spatial memory task, the robot must learn how to associate perceptual information with a particular location to aid in navigating to the goal. A self-organizing feature map (SOFM) is used to discretize the perceptual space. The robot must then learn to associate these perceptual states with an action used to navigate through the environment. Two navigational approaches are proposed. The first approach involves computing a probabilistic graph between SOFM nodes and then searching the graph to locate a path to the goal. The second approach uses temporal difference learning to learn the association between an SOFM node and an action that will direct it to the goal. The paper compares the effectiveness of these two approaches and discusses their respective utility.
Mark A. Busch, Marjorie Skubic, James Keller 0001, Kevin E. Stone
ICRA1