Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
S. Kamal Abdali
dblp:24/5006
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 4 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Programming languages and type systems · 96% Program verification · 4% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 77% Computational complexity · 23% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems
language design |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | A Smalltalk System for Algebraic Manipulation · OOPSLA 1986 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Generalization Heuristics for Theorems Related to Recursively Defined Functions · AAAI 1984 |
Computational complexity › computability theory
recursive functions |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Generalization Heuristics for Theorems Related to Recursively Defined Functions · AAAI 1984 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
formal verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1971 | On Proving Sequential Machine Designs · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 1971 | On Proving Sequential Machine Designs · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
sequential circuit verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1971 | On Proving Sequential Machine Designs · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Program verification › dynamic verification › runtime verification
assertion checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1971 | On Proving Sequential Machine Designs · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple inheritance · 0.0dynamic class creation · 0.0program-proving technique · 0.0assertion derivation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | A Parallel Implementation of the Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition AlgorithmabstractIn this paper, we describe a parallelization scheme for Collins' cylindrical algebraic decomposition algorithm for quantifier elimination in the theory of real closed fields. We first discuss a parallel implementation of the computer algebra system SAC2 in which a complete sequential implementation of Collins' algorithm already exists. We report some initial results on the speedup obtained, drawing on a suite of examples previously given by Arnon. B. David Saunders, Hong R. Lee, S. Kamal Abdali |
ISSAC | 3 |
| 1988 | Experiments with Quadtree Representation of Matrices
S. Kamal Abdali, David S. Wise |
ISSAC | 1 |
| 1986 | A Smalltalk System for Algebraic ManipulationabstractThis paper describes the design of an algebra system Views implemented in Smalltalk. Views contains facilities for dynamic creation and manipulation of computational domains, for viewing these domains as various categories such as groups, rings, or fields, and for expressing algorithms generically at the level of categories. The design of Views has resulted in the addition of some new abstractions to Smalltalk that are quite useful in their own right. Parameterized classes provide a means for run-time creation of new classes that exhibit generally very similar behavior, differing only in minor ways that can be described by different instantiations of certain parameters. Categories allow the abstraction of the common behavior of classes that derives from the class objects and operations satisfying certain laws independently of the implementation of those objects and operations. Views allow the run-time association of classes with categories (and of categories with other categories), facilitating the use of code written for categories with quite different interpretations of operations. Together, categories and views provide an additional mechanism for code sharing that is richer than both single and multiple inheritance. The paper gives algebraic as well as non-algebraic examples of the above-mentioned features. S. Kamal Abdali, Guy W. Cherry, Neil Soiffer |
OOPSLA | 1 |
| 1985 | Transitive Closure and Related Semiring Properties via Eliminants
S. Kamal Abdali, B. David Saunders |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 1984 | Generalization Heuristics for Theorems Related to Recursively Defined Functions
S. Kamal Abdali, Jan Vytopil |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1976 | A Lambda-Calculus Model of Programming Languages - I. Simple Constructs
S. Kamal Abdali |
Comput. Lang. | 1 |
| 1976 | A Lambda-Calculus Model of Programming Languages - II. Jumps and Procedures
S. Kamal Abdali |
Comput. Lang. | 1 |
| 1976 | An Abstraction Algorithm for Combinatory LogicabstractThis note presents a practical algorithm for carrying out abstraction on combinatory terms. The well-known abstraction algorithms [1, pp. 188ff.] defining abstracts in terms of the combinator sets {S, K}, {B, C, K, W}, etc. operate on one variable at a time, and result in rather long abstracts when several variables are involved. These algorithms are not practical for the applications of the combinatory logic to the theory of computing which make much use of multi-variable abstraction (e.g., [2], [3]). The present algorithm performs the abstraction with respect to all specified variables in a single step, and yields abstracts in a concise form (with sizes proportional to those of given combinatory terms). S. Kamal Abdali |
J. Symb. Log. | 1 |
| 1971 | Feature extraction algorithms
S. Kamal Abdali |
Pattern Recognit. | 1 |
| 1971 | On Proving Sequential Machine DesignsabstractBased on a program-proving technique, a method for proving sequential machine designs is presented. The method associates with each state of the machine an assertion about the sequences taking the machine into that state. The design is proved by: showing all assertions true irrespective of state changes; and deriving the design specifications from the assertions at final states. The method is illustrated' on two finite automata. S. Kamal Abdali |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |