Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christopher J. Paciorek
dblp:24/5914
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
covariance function |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Nonstationary Covariance Functions for Gaussian Process Regression · NIPS 2003 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Nonstationary Covariance Functions for Gaussian Process Regression · NIPS 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian inference · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Nonstationary Covariance Functions for Gaussian Process RegressionabstractWe introduce a class of nonstationary covariance functions for Gaussian process (GP) regression. Nonstationary covariance functions allow the model to adapt to functions whose smoothness varies with the inputs. The class includes a nonstationary version of the Matérn stationary co- variance, in which the differentiability of the regression function is con- trolled by a parameter, freeing one from fixing the differentiability in advance. In experiments, the nonstationary GP regression model per- forms well when the input space is two or three dimensions, outperform- ing a neural network model and Bayesian free-knot spline models, and competitive with a Bayesian neural network, but is outperformed in one dimension by a state-of-the-art Bayesian free-knot spline model. The model readily generalizes to non-Gaussian data. Use of computational methods for speeding GP fitting may allow for implementation of the method on larger datasets. Christopher J. Paciorek, Mark J. Schervish |
NIPS | 1 |