Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel S. Bernstein

dblp:24/6140 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 54% Multi-agent systems · 20% Reinforcement learning · 20%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process
0.112007
Solving POMDPs Using Quadratically Constrained Linear Programs · IJCAI 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
decentralized POMDP
0.112005
Bounded Policy Iteration for Decentralized POMDPs · IJCAI 2005
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
markov games
0.012004
Dynamic Programming for Partially Observable Stochastic Games · AAAI 2004
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
partially observable stochastic games
0.012004
Dynamic Programming for Partially Observable Stochastic Games · AAAI 2004
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
contract algorithms
0.012003
Contract Algorithms and Robots on Rays: Unifying Two Scheduling Problems · IJCAI 2003
Mathematical optimization
scheduling
0.012003
Contract Algorithms and Robots on Rays: Unifying Two Scheduling Problems · IJCAI 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quadratically constrained linear programming · 0.1policy iteration · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Optimizing fixed-size stochastic controllers for POMDPs and decentralized POMDPs
Christopher Amato, Daniel S. Bernstein, Shlomo Zilberstein
Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst.2
2009 Policy Iteration for Decentralized Control of Markov Decision Processes
abstract
Coordination of distributed agents is required for problems arising in many areas, including multi-robot systems, networking and e-commerce. As a formal framework for such problems, we use the decentralized partially observable Markov decision process (DEC-POMDP). Though much work has been done on optimal dynamic programming algorithms for the single-agent version of the problem, optimal algorithms for the multiagent case have been elusive. The main contribution of this paper is an optimal policy iteration algorithm for solving DEC-POMDPs. The algorithm uses stochastic finite-state controllers to represent policies. The solution can include a correlation device, which allows agents to correlate their actions without communicating. This approach alternates between expanding the controller and performing value-preserving transformations, which modify the controller without sacrificing value. We present two efficient value-preserving transformations: one can reduce the size of the controller and the other can improve its value while keeping the size fixed. Empirical results demonstrate the usefulness of value-preserving transformations in increasing value while keeping controller size to a minimum. To broaden the applicability of the approach, we also present a heuristic version of the policy iteration algorithm, which sacrifices convergence to optimality. This algorithm further reduces the size of the controllers at each step by assuming that probability distributions over the other agents' actions are known. While this assumption may not hold in general, it helps produce higher quality solutions in our test problems.
Daniel S. Bernstein, Christopher Amato, Eric A. Hansen, Shlomo Zilberstein
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1
2007 Solving POMDPs Using Quadratically Constrained Linear Programs
Christopher Amato, Daniel S. Bernstein, Shlomo Zilberstein
IJCAI2
2007 Optimizing Memory-Bounded Controllers for Decentralized POMDPs
Christopher Amato, Daniel S. Bernstein, Shlomo Zilberstein
UAI2
2005 Bounded Policy Iteration for Decentralized POMDPs
Daniel S. Bernstein, Eric A. Hansen, Shlomo Zilberstein
IJCAI1
2004 Dynamic Programming for Partially Observable Stochastic Games
Eric A. Hansen, Daniel S. Bernstein, Shlomo Zilberstein
AAAI2
2003 Contract Algorithms and Robots on Rays: Unifying Two Scheduling Problems
Daniel S. Bernstein, Lev Finkelstein, Shlomo Zilberstein
IJCAI1
2000 The Complexity of Decentralized Control of Markov Decision Processes
Daniel S. Bernstein, Shlomo Zilberstein, Neil Immerman
UAI1