Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David M. Schneider
dblp:24/6628
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Vocal Call Locator Benchmark (VCL) for localizing rodent vocalizations from multi-channel audio · NeurIPS 2024 |
Audio and music processing
sound source localization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Vocal Call Locator Benchmark (VCL) for localizing rodent vocalizations from multi-channel audio · NeurIPS 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Designing neurophysiology experiments to optimally constrain receptive field models along parametric submanifolds · NIPS 2008 |
Mathematical optimization
experimental design |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Designing neurophysiology experiments to optimally constrain receptive field models along parametric submanifolds · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
receptive field modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Designing neurophysiology experiments to optimally constrain receptive field models along parametric submanifolds · NIPS 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sound source localization · 2.3deep learning · 2.3tangent space uncertainty reduction · 0.2parametric submanifold modeling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Vocal Call Locator Benchmark (VCL) for localizing rodent vocalizations from multi-channel audioabstractUnderstanding the behavioral and neural dynamics of social interactions is a goalof contemporary neuroscience. Many machine learning methods have emergedin recent years to make sense of complex video and neurophysiological data thatresult from these experiments. Less focus has been placed on understanding howanimals process acoustic information, including social vocalizations. A criticalstep to bridge this gap is determining the senders and receivers of acoustic infor-mation in social interactions. While sound source localization (SSL) is a classicproblem in signal processing, existing approaches are limited in their ability tolocalize animal-generated sounds in standard laboratory environments. Advancesin deep learning methods for SSL are likely to help address these limitations,however there are currently no publicly available models, datasets, or benchmarksto systematically evaluate SSL algorithms in the domain of bioacoustics. Here,we present the VCL Benchmark: the first large-scale dataset for benchmarkingSSL algorithms in rodents. We acquired synchronized video and multi-channelaudio recordings of 767,295 sounds with annotated ground truth sources across 9conditions. The dataset provides benchmarks which evaluate SSL performance onreal data, simulated acoustic data, and a mixture of real and simulated data. Weintend for this benchmark to facilitate knowledge transfer between the neuroscienceand acoustic machine learning communities, which have had limited overlap. Ralph Peterson, Aramis Tanelus, Christopher Ick, Bartul Mimica, Niegil Francis Muttath Joseph, Violet Ivan, Aman Choudhri, Annegret Falkner, Mala Murthy, David M. Schneider, Dan Sanes, Alex Williams |
NeurIPS | 10 |
| 2008 | Designing neurophysiology experiments to optimally constrain receptive field models along parametric submanifoldsabstractSequential optimal design methods hold great promise for improving the efficiency of neurophysiology experiments. However, previous methods for optimal experimental design have incorporated only weak prior information about the underlying neural system (e.g., the sparseness or smoothness of the receptive field). Here we describe how to use stronger prior information, in the form of parametric models of the receptive field, in order to construct optimal stimuli and further improve the efficiency of our experiments. For example, if we believe that the receptive field is well-approximated by a Gabor function, then our method constructs stimuli that optimally constrain the Gabor parameters (orientation, spatial frequency, etc.) using as few experimental trials as possible. More generally, we may believe a priori that the receptive field lies near a known sub-manifold of the full parameter space; in this case, our method chooses stimuli in order to reduce the uncertainty along the tangent space of this sub-manifold as rapidly as possible. Applications to simulated and real data indicate that these methods may in many cases improve the experimental efficiency. Jeremy Lewi, Robert J. Butera, David M. Schneider, Sarah M. N. Woolley, Liam Paninski |
NIPS | 3 |