Sarala M. Wimalaratne

dblp:24/7252 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-5355-2576ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 10 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
9 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% Distributed systems · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
identifier mapping
0.212015
SPARQL-enabled identifier conversion with Identifiers.org · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
semantic data integration
0.212015
SPARQL-enabled identifier conversion with Identifiers.org · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
biological model representation
0.222009
Biophysical annotation and representation of CellML models · Bioinform. 2009
A method for visualizing CellML models · Bioinform. 2009
Data integration and cleaning › scientific data integration
biological data integration
0.212014
The EBI RDF platform: linked open data for the life sciences · Bioinform. 2014
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud service management
cloud service deployment
0.112021
Identifiers.org: Compact Identifier services in the cloud · Bioinform. 2021
Distributed systems › distributed system dependability › reliable distributed systems
high-availability services
0.112021
Identifiers.org: Compact Identifier services in the cloud · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
biomedical data integration
0.112012
An infrastructure for ontology-based information systems in biomedicine: RICORDO case study · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
ontology-based annotation
0.112012
An infrastructure for ontology-based information systems in biomedicine: RICORDO case study · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › knowledge representation in biology
biomedical ontology
0.112011
A common layer of interoperability for biomedical ontologies based on OWL EL · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology
genetic circuit design
0.112011
Model annotation for synthetic biology: automating model to nucleotide sequence conversion · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
synthetic biology
0.112011
Model annotation for synthetic biology: automating model to nucleotide sequence conversion · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › biological model representation
model annotation
0.122016
ProbOnto: ontology and knowledge base of probability distributions · Bioinform. 2016
Model annotation for synthetic biology: automating model to nucleotide sequence conversion · Bioinform. 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.012009
Biophysical annotation and representation of CellML models · Bioinform. 2009
Visualization and visual analytics
model visualization
0.012009
A method for visualizing CellML models · Bioinform. 2009
Visualization and visual analytics
scientific visualization
0.012009
A method for visualizing CellML models · Bioinform. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

compact identifier scheme · 1.0cloud deployment · 1.0SPARQL · 0.4ontology engineering · 0.2ontology reasoning · 0.1inference engine · 0.1tractable reasoning · 0.1ontology transformation · 0.1OWL EL · 0.1CellML · 0.1visual language · 0.1ontology annotation · 0.1graph reduction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Identifiers.org: Compact Identifier services in the cloud
abstract
MOTIVATION: Since its launch in 2010, Identifiers.org has become an important tool for the annotation and cross-referencing of Life Science data. In 2016, we established the Compact Identifier (CID) scheme (prefix: accession) to generate globally unique identifiers for data resources using their locally assigned accession identifiers. Since then, we have developed and improved services to support the growing need to create, reference and resolve CIDs, in systems ranging from human readable text to cloud-based e-infrastructures, by providing high availability and low-latency cloud-based services, backed by a high-quality, manually curated resource. RESULTS: We describe a set of services that can be used to construct and resolve CIDs in Life Sciences and beyond. We have developed a new front end for accessing the Identifiers.org registry data and APIs to simplify integration of Identifiers.org CID services with third-party applications. We have also deployed the new Identifiers.org infrastructure in a commercial cloud environment, bringing our services closer to the data. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: https://identifiers.org.
Manuel Bernal Llinares, Javier Ferrer-Gómez, Nick S. Juty, Carole A. Goble, Sarala M. Wimalaratne, Henning Hermjakob
Bioinform.5
2016 ProbOnto: ontology and knowledge base of probability distributions
abstract
MOTIVATION: Probability distributions play a central role in mathematical and statistical modelling. The encoding, annotation and exchange of such models could be greatly simplified by a resource providing a common reference for the definition of probability distributions. Although some resources exist, no suitably detailed and complex ontology exists nor any database allowing programmatic access. RESULTS: ProbOnto, is an ontology-based knowledge base of probability distributions, featuring more than 80 uni- and multivariate distributions with their defining functions, characteristics, relationships and re-parameterization formulas. It can be used for model annotation and facilitates the encoding of distribution-based models, related functions and quantities. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://probonto.org CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Maciej J. Swat, Pierre Grenon, Sarala M. Wimalaratne
Bioinform.3
2015 SPARQL-enabled identifier conversion with Identifiers.org
abstract
MOTIVATION: On the semantic web, in life sciences in particular, data is often distributed via multiple resources. Each of these sources is likely to use their own International Resource Identifier for conceptually the same resource or database record. The lack of correspondence between identifiers introduces a barrier when executing federated SPARQL queries across life science data. RESULTS: We introduce a novel SPARQL-based service to enable on-the-fly integration of life science data. This service uses the identifier patterns defined in the Identifiers.org Registry to generate a plurality of identifier variants, which can then be used to match source identifiers with target identifiers. We demonstrate the utility of this identifier integration approach by answering queries across major producers of life science Linked Data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The SPARQL-based identifier conversion service is available without restriction at http://identifiers.org/services/sparql.
Sarala M. Wimalaratne, Jerven T. Bolleman, Nick S. Juty, Toshiaki Katayama, Michel Dumontier, Nicole Redaschi, Nicolas Le Novère, Henning Hermjakob, Camille Laibe
Bioinform.1
2014 The EBI RDF platform: linked open data for the life sciences
abstract
MOTIVATION: Resource description framework (RDF) is an emerging technology for describing, publishing and linking life science data. As a major provider of bioinformatics data and services, the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) is committed to making data readily accessible to the community in ways that meet existing demand. The EBI RDF platform has been developed to meet an increasing demand to coordinate RDF activities across the institute and provides a new entry point to querying and exploring integrated resources available at the EBI.
Simon Jupp, James Malone, Jerven T. Bolleman, Marco Brandizi, Mark Davies, Leyla Jael Castro, Anna Gaulton, Sebastien Gehant, Camille Laibe, Nicole Redaschi, Sarala M. Wimalaratne, Maria Jesus Martin, Nicolas Le Novère, Helen E. Parkinson, Ewan Birney, Andrew M. Jenkinson
Bioinform.11
2012 An infrastructure for ontology-based information systems in biomedicine: RICORDO case study
abstract
SUMMARY: The article presents an infrastructure for supporting the semantic interoperability of biomedical resources based on the management (storing and inference-based querying) of their ontology-based annotations. This infrastructure consists of: (i) a repository to store and query ontology-based annotations; (ii) a knowledge base server with an inference engine to support the storage of and reasoning over ontologies used in the annotation of resources; (iii) a set of applications and services allowing interaction with the integrated repository and knowledge base. The infrastructure is being prototyped and developed and evaluated by the RICORDO project in support of the knowledge management of biomedical resources, including physiology and pharmacology models and associated clinical data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The RICORDO toolkit and its source code are freely available from http://ricordo.eu/relevant-resources. CONTACT: [email protected].
Sarala M. Wimalaratne, Pierre Grenon, Robert Hoehndorf, Georgios V. Gkoutos, Bernard de Bono
Bioinform.1
2011 A common layer of interoperability for biomedical ontologies based on OWL EL
abstract
MOTIVATION: Ontologies are essential in biomedical research due to their ability to semantically integrate content from different scientific databases and resources. Their application improves capabilities for querying and mining biological knowledge. An increasing number of ontologies is being developed for this purpose, and considerable effort is invested into formally defining them in order to represent their semantics explicitly. However, current biomedical ontologies do not facilitate data integration and interoperability yet, since reasoning over these ontologies is very complex and cannot be performed efficiently or is even impossible. We propose the use of less expressive subsets of ontology representation languages to enable efficient reasoning and achieve the goal of genuine interoperability between ontologies. RESULTS: We present and evaluate EL Vira, a framework that transforms OWL ontologies into the OWL EL subset, thereby enabling the use of tractable reasoning. We illustrate which OWL constructs and inferences are kept and lost following the conversion and demonstrate the performance gain of reasoning indicated by the significant reduction of processing time. We applied EL Vira to the open biomedical ontologies and provide a repository of ontologies resulting from this conversion. EL Vira creates a common layer of ontological interoperability that, for the first time, enables the creation of software solutions that can employ biomedical ontologies to perform inferences and answer complex queries to support scientific analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The EL Vira software is available from http://el-vira.googlecode.com and converted OBO ontologies and their mappings are available from http://bioonto.gen.cam.ac.uk/el-ont.
Robert Hoehndorf, Michel Dumontier, Anika Oellrich, Sarala M. Wimalaratne, Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann, Paul N. Schofield, Georgios V. Gkoutos
Bioinform.4
2011 Model annotation for synthetic biology: automating model to nucleotide sequence conversion
abstract
MOTIVATION: The need for the automated computational design of genetic circuits is becoming increasingly apparent with the advent of ever more complex and ambitious synthetic biology projects. Currently, most circuits are designed through the assembly of models of individual parts such as promoters, ribosome binding sites and coding sequences. These low level models are combined to produce a dynamic model of a larger device that exhibits a desired behaviour. The larger model then acts as a blueprint for physical implementation at the DNA level. However, the conversion of models of complex genetic circuits into DNA sequences is a non-trivial undertaking due to the complexity of mapping the model parts to their physical manifestation. Automating this process is further hampered by the lack of computationally tractable information in most models. RESULTS: We describe a method for automatically generating DNA sequences from dynamic models implemented in CellML and Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML). We also identify the metadata needed to annotate models to facilitate automated conversion, and propose and demonstrate a method for the markup of these models using RDF. Our algorithm has been implemented in a software tool called MoSeC. AVAILABILITY: The software is available from the authors' web site http://research.ncl.ac.uk/synthetic_biology/downloads.html.
Goksel Misirli, Jennifer Hallinan, Tommy Yu, James R. Lawson, Sarala M. Wimalaratne, Mike T. Cooling, Anil Wipat
Bioinform.5
2011 Revision history aware repositories of computational models of biological systems
abstract
BACKGROUND: Building repositories of computational models of biological systems ensures that published models are available for both education and further research, and can provide a source of smaller, previously verified models to integrate into a larger model. One problem with earlier repositories has been the limitations in facilities to record the revision history of models. Often, these facilities are limited to a linear series of versions which were deposited in the repository. This is problematic for several reasons. Firstly, there are many instances in the history of biological systems modelling where an 'ancestral' model is modified by different groups to create many different models. With a linear series of versions, if the changes made to one model are merged into another model, the merge appears as a single item in the history. This hides useful revision history information, and also makes further merges much more difficult, as there is no record of which changes have or have not already been merged. In addition, a long series of individual changes made outside of the repository are also all merged into a single revision when they are put back into the repository, making it difficult to separate out individual changes. Furthermore, many earlier repositories only retain the revision history of individual files, rather than of a group of files. This is an important limitation to overcome, because some types of models, such as CellML 1.1 models, can be developed as a collection of modules, each in a separate file. The need for revision history is widely recognised for computer software, and a lot of work has gone into developing version control systems and distributed version control systems (DVCSs) for tracking the revision history. However, to date, there has been no published research on how DVCSs can be applied to repositories of computational models of biological systems. RESULTS: We have extended the Physiome Model Repository software to be fully revision history aware, by building it on top of Mercurial, an existing DVCS. We have demonstrated the utility of this approach, when used in conjunction with the model composition facilities in CellML, to build and understand more complex models. We have also demonstrated the ability of the repository software to present version history to casual users over the web, and to highlight specific versions which are likely to be useful to users. CONCLUSIONS: Providing facilities for maintaining and using revision history information is an important part of building a useful repository of computational models, as this information is useful both for understanding the source of and justification for parts of a model, and to facilitate automated processes such as merges. The availability of fully revision history aware repositories, and associated tools, will therefore be of significant benefit to the community.
Andrew K. Miller, Tommy Yu, Randall Britten, Mike T. Cooling, James R. Lawson, Dougal Cowan, Alan Garny, Matt D. B. Halstead, Peter J. Hunter, David P. Nickerson, Geoff Nunns, Sarala M. Wimalaratne, Poul M. F. Nielsen
BMC Bioinform.12
2009 A method for visualizing CellML models
abstract
MOTIVATION: The Physiome Project was established in 1997 to develop tools to facilitate international collaboration in the physiological sciences and the sharing of biological models and experimental data. The CellML language was developed to represent and exchange mathematical models of biological processes. CellML models can be very complicated, making it difficult to interpret the underlying physical and biological concepts and relationships captured/described in the mathematical model. RESULTS: To address this issue a set of ontologies was developed to explicitly annotate the biophysical concepts represented in the CellML models. This article presents a framework that combines a visual language, together with CellML ontologies, to support the visualization of the underlying physical and biological concepts described by the mathematical model and also their relationships with the CellML model. Automated CellML model visualization assists in the interpretation of model concepts and facilitates model communication and exchange between different communities.
Sarala M. Wimalaratne, Matt D. B. Halstead, Catherine M. Lloyd, Mike T. Cooling, Edmund J. Crampin, Poul M. F. Nielsen
Bioinform.1
2009 Biophysical annotation and representation of CellML models
abstract
MOTIVATION: CellML is an implementation-independent model description language for specifying and exchanging biological processes. The focus of CellML is the representation of mathematical formulations of biological processes. The language captures the mathematical and model building constructs well, but does not lend itself to capturing the biology these models represent. RESULTS: This article describes the development of an ontological framework for annotating CellML models with biophysical concepts. We demonstrate that, by using these ontological mappings, in combination with a set of graph reduction rules, it is possible to represent the underlying biological process described in a CellML model.
Sarala M. Wimalaratne, Matt D. B. Halstead, Catherine M. Lloyd, Edmund J. Crampin, Poul M. F. Nielsen
Bioinform.1