Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Caitlin Kenny

dblp:24/9255 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 78% Usability and user experience research · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
attention control
0.112011
Effects of unreliable automation and individual differences on supervisory control of multiple ground robots · HRI 2011
Human-robot interaction
automation reliability
0.112011
Effects of unreliable automation and individual differences on supervisory control of multiple ground robots · HRI 2011
Usability and user experience research
individual differences
0.112011
Effects of unreliable automation and individual differences on supervisory control of multiple ground robots · HRI 2011
Human-robot interaction › teleoperation
supervisory control
0.112011
Effects of unreliable automation and individual differences on supervisory control of multiple ground robots · HRI 2011
Human-robot interaction › multi-robot systems
multi-robot management
0.012011
Effects of unreliable automation and individual differences on supervisory control of multiple ground robots · HRI 2011
Human-robot interaction › robot navigation
path planning
0.012011
Effects of unreliable automation and individual differences on supervisory control of multiple ground robots · HRI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Effects of unreliable automation and individual differences on supervisory control of multiple ground robots
abstract
A military multitasking environment was simulated to examine the effects of unreliable automation on the performance of robotics operators. The main task was to manage a team of four ground robots with the assistance of RoboLeader, an intelligent agent capable of coordinating the robots and changing their routes based upon developments in the mission environment. RoboLeader's recommendations were manipulated to be either false-alarm prone or miss prone, with a reliability level of either 60% or 90%. The visual density of the targeting environment was manipulated by the presence or absence of friendly soldiers. Results showed that the type of RoboLeader unreliability (false-alarm vs. miss prone) affected operator's performance of tasks involving visual scanning (target detection, route editing, and situation awareness). There was a consistent effect of visual density for multiple performance measures. Participants with higher spatial ability performed better on the two tasks that required the most visual scanning (target detection and route editing). Participants' attentional control impacted their overall multitasking performance, especially during their execution of the secondary tasks (communication and gauge monitoring).
Jessie Y. C. Chen, Michael J. Barnes, Caitlin Kenny
HRI3