Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Deepak Jagtap
dblp:24/9281
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-0144-8048ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation
parallel discrete event simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Parallel Discrete Event Simulation for Multi-Core Systems: Analysis and Optimization · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2014 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
bottleneck analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Parallel Discrete Event Simulation for Multi-Core Systems: Analysis and Optimization · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2014 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
simulation-based evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Parallel Discrete Event Simulation for Multi-Core Systems: Analysis and Optimization · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
shared memory · 0.2multithreading · 0.2message passing · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Parallel Discrete Event Simulation for Multi-Core Systems: Analysis and OptimizationabstractParallel Discrete Event Simulation (PDES) can substantially improve the performance and capacity of simulation, allowing the study of larger, more detailed models, in less time. PDES is a fine-grained parallel application whose performance and scalability is limited by communication latencies. Traditionally, PDES simulation kernels use message passing; often these simulators are written for distributed environments, and shared memory is used to optimize message passing among processes on the same machine. In this paper, we develop, characterize and optimize a thread-based version of a PDES simulator on three representative multi-core platforms. The multi-threaded implementation eliminates multiple message copying and significantly minimizes synchronization delays. We study the performance of the simulator on three hardware platforms: an Intel Core i7 machine, and a 48-core AMD Opteron Magny-Cours system, and a 64-core Tilera TilePro64. We discover that the three platforms encounter substantially different bottlenecks because of their different architectures. We identify these bottlenecks and propose mechanisms to overcome them. Our results show that multi-threaded implementation improves the performance over an MPI-based version by up to a factor of 3 on the Core i7, 1.4 on the AMD Magny-Cours, and 2.8 on the Tilera Tile64. Deepak Jagtap, Nael B. Abu-Ghazaleh, Dmitry V. Ponomarev |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 2 |
| 2012 | Optimization of Parallel Discrete Event Simulator for Multi-core SystemsabstractParallel Discrete Event Simulation (PDES) can substantially improve performance and capacity of simulation, allowing the study of larger, more detailed models, in shorter times. PDES is a fine-grained parallel application whose performance and scalability are limited by communication latencies. Traditionally, PDES simulation kernels use processes that communicate using message passing, shared memory is used to optimize message passing for processes running on the same machine. We report on our experiences in implementing a thread-based version of the ROSS simulator. The multithreaded implementation eliminates multiple message copying and significantly minimizes synchronization delays. We study the performance of the simulator on two hardware platforms: a Core i7 machine and a 48-core AMD Opteron Magny-Cours system. We identify performance bottlenecks and propose and evaluate mechanisms to overcome them. Results show that multithreaded implementation improves performance over the MPI version by up to a factor of 3 for the Core i7 machine and 1.2 on Magny-cours for 48-way simulation. Deepak Jagtap, Nael B. Abu-Ghazaleh, Dmitry V. Ponomarev |
IPDPS | 1 |
| 2010 | Performance Evaluation of PDES on Multi-core ClustersabstractTrends in VLSI and micro architecture design have ushered in the multi-core era, where the number of cores on a chip is expected to grow with every processor generation. Soon, each chip will have a large number of tightly integrated processing cores with communication latencies substantially lower than those present in conventional clusters. Clusters made of such microprocessors experience non-uniform latencies between cores: cores on the same chip can communicate faster than cores on different chips, cores on the same machine can communicate faster than cores on different machines. In this paper, we characterize the performance of PDES models on a cluster of dual quad-core machines using a parameterizable modified version of Phold, a standard benchmark for parallel simulation. We study various combinations of regional and remote communication patterns to quantify the impact of communication on overall performance of simulation. We discover that the amount of communication has determining impact and it's essential to optimize this communication at each level to take maximum advantage of multi-core platform. We show that partitioning significantly improves performance. We also explore the impact of load imbalance on application performance and provide critical insight into how to partition for these different environments. We believe that this study represents a significant first step in characterizing the performance space for PDES on this emerging platform. Ketan Bahulkar, Nicole Hofmann, Deepak Jagtap, Nael B. Abu-Ghazaleh, Dmitry V. Ponomarev |
DS-RT | 3 |