Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James H. von Brecht

dblp:24/9745 · also James von Brecht · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Optimization for machine learning · 19% Trustworthy machine learning · 17%
Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 46% Mathematical optimization · 23% Algorithms and data structures · 17%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable representation
0.812024
Feature Collapse · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.712023
Long-Tailed Learning Requires Feature Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › class imbalance
long-tailed learning
0.712023
Long-Tailed Learning Requires Feature Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape
0.722018
The Multilinear Structure of ReLU Networks · ICML 2018
Deep Linear Networks with Arbitrary Loss: All Local Minima Are Global · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimization landscape
0.722018
The Multilinear Structure of ReLU Networks · ICML 2018
Deep Linear Networks with Arbitrary Loss: All Local Minima Are Global · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
deep linear networks
0.312018
Deep Linear Networks with Arbitrary Loss: All Local Minima Are Global · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
local minima analysis
0.312018
Deep Linear Networks with Arbitrary Loss: All Local Minima Are Global · ICML 2018
Data mining
clustering
0.322013
Multiclass Total Variation Clustering · NIPS 2013
Convergence and Energy Landscape for Cheeger Cut Clustering · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.312017
A recurrent neural network without chaos · ICLR (Poster) 2017
Algorithms and data structures
clustering
0.212016
Consistency of Cheeger and Ratio Graph Cuts · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph partitioning
0.212016
The Product Cut · NIPS 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph cut
ratio cut
0.212016
Consistency of Cheeger and Ratio Graph Cuts · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory
spectral graph theory
0.212016
The Product Cut · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization
0.222018
The Multilinear Structure of ReLU Networks · ICML 2018
Deep Linear Networks with Arbitrary Loss: All Local Minima Are Global · ICML 2018
Image and video processing › image restoration › inverse problem › inverse problem regularization › image regularization
total variation
0.212013
Multiclass Total Variation Clustering · NIPS 2013
Image and video processing
variational methods
0.212013
Multiclass Total Variation Clustering · NIPS 2013
Mathematical optimization
convex relaxation
0.212013
Multiclass Total Variation Clustering · NIPS 2013
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.112012
Convergence and Energy Landscape for Cheeger Cut Clustering · NIPS 2012
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis
0.112012
Convergence and Energy Landscape for Cheeger Cut Clustering · NIPS 2012
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph cut
0.112012
Convergence and Energy Landscape for Cheeger Cut Clustering · NIPS 2012
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.112012
Convergence and Energy Landscape for Cheeger Cut Clustering · NIPS 2012
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction › nonlinear dimensionality reduction
manifold learning
0.112016
Consistency of Cheeger and Ratio Graph Cuts · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic sequence classification task · 0.8dynamical systems analysis · 0.6total variation · 0.5nonsmooth analysis · 0.3nonnegative matrix factorization · 0.3lipschitz analysis · 0.3harmonic analysis · 0.3convex analysis · 0.3steepest descent · 0.3inverse power method · 0.3spectral graph theory · 0.2multiplicative cut objective · 0.2consistency analysis · 0.2non-negative matrix factorization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Feature Collapse
abstract
We formalize and study a phenomenon called *feature collapse* that makes precise the intuitive idea that entities playing a similar role in a learning task receive similar representations. As feature collapse requires a notion of task, we leverage a synthetic task in which a learner must classify `sentences' constituted of $L$ tokens. We start by showing experimentally that feature collapse goes hand in hand with generalization. We then prove that, in the large sample limit, distinct tokens that play identical roles in the task receive identical local feature representations in the first layer of the network. This analysis shows that a neural network trained on this task provably learns interpretable and meaningful representations in its first layer.
Thomas Laurent 0001, James H. von Brecht, Xavier Bresson
ICLR2
2023 Long-Tailed Learning Requires Feature Learning
Thomas Laurent 0001, James H. von Brecht, Xavier Bresson
ICLR2
2018 Deep Linear Networks with Arbitrary Loss: All Local Minima Are Global
abstract
We consider deep linear networks with arbitrary convex differentiable loss. We provide a short and elementary proof of the fact that all local minima are global minima if the hidden layers are either 1) at least as wide as the input layer, or 2) at least as wide as the output layer. This result is the strongest possible in the following sense: If the loss is convex and Lipschitz but not differentiable then deep linear networks can have sub-optimal local minima.
Thomas Laurent 0001, James H. von Brecht
ICML2
2018 The Multilinear Structure of ReLU Networks
abstract
We study the loss surface of neural networks equipped with a hinge loss criterion and ReLU or leaky ReLU nonlinearities. Any such network defines a piecewise multilinear form in parameter space. By appealing to harmonic analysis we show that all local minima of such network are non-differentiable, except for those minima that occur in a region of parameter space where the loss surface is perfectly flat. Non-differentiable minima are therefore not technicalities or pathologies; they are heart of the problem when investigating the loss of ReLU networks. As a consequence, we must employ techniques from nonsmooth analysis to study these loss surfaces. We show how to apply these techniques in some illustrative cases.
Thomas Laurent 0001, James H. von Brecht
ICML2
2017 A recurrent neural network without chaos
Thomas Laurent 0001, James H. von Brecht
ICLR (Poster)2
2016 The Product Cut
abstract
We introduce a theoretical and algorithmic framework for multi-way graph partitioning that relies on a multiplicative cut-based objective. We refer to this objective as the Product Cut. We provide a detailed investigation of the mathematical properties of this objective and an effective algorithm for its optimization. The proposed model has strong mathematical underpinnings, and the corresponding algorithm achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmark data sets.
Thomas Laurent 0001, James H. von Brecht, Xavier Bresson, Arthur Szlam
NIPS2
2016 Consistency of Cheeger and Ratio Graph Cuts
abstract
This paper establishes the consistency of a family of graph-cut- based algorithms for clustering of data clouds. We consider point clouds obtained as samples of a ground-truth measure. We investigate approaches to clustering based on minimizing objective functionals defined on proximity graphs of the given sample. Our focus is on functionals based on graph cuts like the Cheeger and ratio cuts. We show that minimizers of these cuts converge as the sample size increases to a minimizer of a corresponding continuum cut (which partitions the ground truth measure). Moreover, we obtain sharp conditions on how the connectivity radius can be scaled with respect to the number of sample points for the consistency to hold. We provide results for two-way and for multiway cuts. Furthermore we provide numerical experiments that illustrate the results and explore the optimality of scaling in dimension two.
Nicolás García Trillos, Dejan Slepcev, James H. von Brecht, Thomas Laurent 0001, Xavier Bresson
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2013 Multiclass Total Variation Clustering
abstract
Ideas from the image processing literature have recently motivated a new set of clustering algorithms that rely on the concept of total variation. While these algorithms perform well for bi-partitioning tasks, their recursive extensions yield unimpressive results for multiclass clustering tasks. This paper presents a general framework for multiclass total variation clustering that does not rely on recursion. The results greatly outperform previous total variation algorithms and compare well with state-of-the-art NMF approaches.
Xavier Bresson, Thomas Laurent 0001, David Uminsky 0001, James H. von Brecht
NIPS4
2012 Convergence and Energy Landscape for Cheeger Cut Clustering
abstract
Unsupervised clustering of scattered, noisy and high-dimensional data points is an important and difficult problem. Continuous relaxations of balanced cut problems yield excellent clustering results. This paper provides rigorous convergence results for two algorithms that solve the relaxed Cheeger Cut minimization. The first algorithm is a new steepest descent algorithm and the second one is a slight modification of the Inverse Power Method algorithm \cite{pro:HeinBuhler10OneSpec}. While the steepest descent algorithm has better theoretical convergence properties, in practice both algorithm perform equally. We also completely characterize the local minima of the relaxed problem in terms of the original balanced cut problem, and relate this characterization to the convergence of the algorithms.
Xavier Bresson, Thomas Laurent 0001, David Uminsky 0001, James H. von Brecht
NIPS4