Tokenized U.S. Treasuries have emerged as a prominent subclass of real-world assets (RWAs), offering cryptographically secured, yield-bearing instruments issued across multi-chain Web3 infrastructures, with growing significance for transparency, accessibility, and financial inclusion. While the market has expanded rapidly, empirical analyses of transaction-level behaviours remain limited. This paper conducts a quantitative, function-level dissection of U.S. Treasury-backed RWA tokens, including BUIDL, BENJI, and USDY across multi-chain: mostly Ethereum and Layer-2s. Decoded contract calls expose core financial primitives such as issuance, redemption, transfer, and bridging, revealing patterns that distinguish institutional participants from smaller or retail users for the extent and limits of inclusivity in current RWA adoption. To infer address-level economic roles, we introduce a curvature-aware representation learning model. Our method outperforms baseline models in role inference on our collected U.S. Treasury transaction dataset and generalizes to address classification across broader public blockchain transaction datasets. The decoded transaction-level patterns in tokenized U.S. Treasuries across chains surface the degree of retail participation, and the role inference model enables the distinction between institutional treasuries, arbitrage bots, and retail traders based on behavioral patterns, facilitating future more transparent, inclusive, and accountable Web3 finance.

Money laundering enables malicious actors to integrate illegal profits into the legitimate economy and has long been a central concern in financial regulation. Blockchain systems introduce new channels for laundering through decentralized, pseudonymous, and cross-border asset transfers. In this context, blockchain exploiters often rely on laundering to conceal fund origins and enable cash-out.

Blockchain’s potential for both financial and societal benefits is affected by regulatory ambiguities and enforcement actions against blockchain entities. Evolving regulatory frameworks emphasize the need for insights to protect users, small investors, and ensure equitable participation. Currently, the lack of systematic analysis creates barriers to understanding trends and making informed decisions about participation. This study proposes methods to analyze litigation drivers by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), to facilitate regular users’ understanding of regulatory trends to make informed decisions about blockchain participation. Utilizing pretrained language models and large language models, we systematically map all SEC complaints against blockchain companies from 2012 to 2024 to thematic factors conceptualized to delineate the factors that drive SEC actions. We quantify the thematic factors and assess their influence on the legal Acts cited within the complaints on an annual basis, allowing us to discern the regulatory emphasis, patterns and conduct trend analysis.

Blockchain technology, with implications in the financial domain, offers data in the form of large-scale transaction networks. Analyzing transaction networks facilitates fraud detection, market analysis, and supports government regulation. Despite many graph representation learning methods for transaction network analysis, we pinpoint two salient limitations that merit more investigation. Existing methods predominantly focus on the snapshots of transaction networks, sidelining the evolving nature of blockchain transaction networks. Existing methodologies may not sufficiently emphasize efficient, incremental learning capabilities, which are essential for addressing the scalability challenges in ever-expanding large-scale transaction networks. To address these challenges, we employed an incremental approach for random walk-based node representation learning in transaction networks. Further, we proposed a Metropolis-Hastings-based random walk mechanism for improved efficiency. The empirical evaluation conducted on blockchain transaction datasets reveals comparable performance in node classification tasks while reducing computational overhead. Potential applications include transaction network monitoring, the efficient classification of blockchain addresses for fraud detection or the identification of specialized address types within the network.

Detecting illicit nodes on blockchain networks is a valuable task for strengthening future regulation. Recent machine learning-based methods proposed to tackle the tasks are using some blockchain transaction datasets with a small portion of samples labeled positive and the rest unlabelled (PU). Albeit the assumption that a random sample of unlabeled nodes are normal nodes is used in some works, we discuss that the label mechanism assumption for the hidden positive labels, and its effect on the evaluation metrics is worth considering. We further explore that PU classifiers dealing with potential hidden positive labels can have improved performance compared to regular machine learning models. We test the PU classifiers with a list of graph representation learning methods for obtaining different feature distributions for the same data to have more reliable results.