Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matej Lébl

dblp:241/2535 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 73% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 27%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image representation
blur invariants
0.712023
Blur Invariants for Image Recognition · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2023
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › object recognition
blur-invariant recognition
0.712023
Blur Invariants for Image Recognition · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2023
Image and video processing › feature extraction
moment invariants
0.712023
Blur Invariants for Image Recognition · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2023
Image and video processing
image similarity
0.512021
Blur-Invariant Similarity Measurement of Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

orthogonal projection operators · 0.7moment expansion · 0.7convolutional neural network · 0.7blur-invariant distance measure · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Blur Invariants for Image Recognition
abstract
Abstract Blur is an image degradation that makes object recognition challenging. Restoration approaches solve this problem via image deblurring, deep learning methods rely on the augmentation of training sets. Invariants with respect to blur offer an alternative way of describing and recognising blurred images without any deblurring and data augmentation. In this paper, we present an original theory of blur invariants. Unlike all previous attempts, the new theory requires no prior knowledge of the blur type. The invariants are constructed in the Fourier domain by means of orthogonal projection operators and moment expansion is used for efficient and stable computation. Applying a general substitution rule, combined invariants to blur and spatial transformations are easy to construct and use. Experimental comparison to Convolutional Neural Networks shows the advantages of the proposed theory.
Jan Flusser, Matej Lébl, Filip Sroubek, Matteo Pedone, Jitka Kostková
Int. J. Comput. Vis.2
2021 Blur-Invariant Similarity Measurement of Images
abstract
This article is a comment on the recent TPAMI paper (Gopalan et al., 2012) that introduced a blur-invariant distance measure between two images. We point out two mistakes of the theory presented in (Gopalan et al., 2012) and propose a correction. We also compare the original and corrected methods experimentally.
Matej Lébl, Filip Sroubek, Jan Flusser
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2020 Handling Gaussian blur without deconvolution
Jitka Kostková, Jan Flusser, Matej Lébl, Matteo Pedone
Pattern Recognit.3
2019 Blur Invariant Template Matching Using Projection onto Convex Sets
Matej Lébl, Filip Sroubek, Jaroslav Kautsky, Jan Flusser
CAIP (1)1