EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Neerja Thakkar
dblp:241/3116
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Autonomous driving · 28% Motion planning and robot control · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Poly-Autoregressive Prediction for Modeling Interactions · CVPR 2025 Adaptive Human Trajectory Prediction via Latent Corridors · ECCV (38) 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › trajectory prediction
human trajectory prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive Human Trajectory Prediction via Latent Corridors · ECCV (38) 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Manipulator as a Tail: Promoting Dynamic Stability for Legged Locomotion · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning › robotic reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for locomotion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Manipulator as a Tail: Promoting Dynamic Stability for Legged Locomotion · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Manipulator as a Tail: Promoting Dynamic Stability for Legged Locomotion · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness in generative models
bias in generative models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Studying Bias in GANs Through the Lens of Race · ECCV (13) 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Studying Bias in GANs Through the Lens of Race · ECCV (13) 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Studying Bias in GANs Through the Lens of Race · ECCV (13) 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.9autoregressive modeling · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.8latent corridors · 0.8incremental training · 0.8behavior cloning · 0.8bias analysis · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Poly-Autoregressive Prediction for Modeling InteractionsabstractWe introduce a simple framework for predicting the behavior of an agent in multi-agent settings. In contrast to autoregressive (AR) tasks, such as language processing, our focus is on scenarios with multiple agents whose interactions are shaped by physical constraints and internal motivations. To this end, we propose Poly-Autoregressive (PAR) modeling, which forecasts an ego agent’s future behavior by reasoning about the ego agent’s state history and the past and current states of other interacting agents. At its core, PAR represents the behavior of all agents as a sequence of tokens, each representing an agent’s state at a specific timestep. With minimal data pre-processing changes, we show that PAR can be applied to three different problems: human action forecasting in social situations, trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles, and object pose forecasting during hand-object interaction. Using a small proof-of-concept transformer backbone, PAR outperforms AR across these three scenarios. Neerja Thakkar, Tara Sadjadpour, Jathushan Rajasegeran, Shiry Ginosar, Jitendra Malik |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | Adaptive Human Trajectory Prediction via Latent Corridors
Neerja Thakkar, Karttikeya Mangalam, Andrea Bajcsy, Jitendra Malik |
ECCV (38) | 1 |
| 2024 | Manipulator as a Tail: Promoting Dynamic Stability for Legged LocomotionabstractFor locomotion, is an arm on a legged robot a liability or an asset for locomotion? Biological systems evolved additional limbs beyond legs that facilitates postural control. This work shows how a manipulator can be an asset for legged locomotion at high speeds or under external perturbations, where the arm serves beyond manipulation. Since the system has 15 degrees of freedom (twelve for the legged robot and three for the arm), off-the-shelf reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms struggle to learn effective locomotion policies. Inspired by Bernstein’s neurophysiological theory of animal motor learning, we develop an incremental training procedure that initially freezes some degrees of freedom and gradually releases them, using behaviour cloning (BC) from an early learning procedure to guide optimization in later learning. Simulation experiments show that our policy increases the success rate by up to 61 percentage points over the baselines. Simulation and real robot experiments suggest that our policy learns to use the arm as a "tail" to initiate robot turning at high speeds and to stabilize the quadruped under external perturbations. Quantitatively, in simulation experiments, we cut the failure rate up to 43.6% during high-speed turning and up to 31.8% for quadruped under external forces compared to using a locked arm. Antonio Loquercio, Ashish Kumar 0007, Neerja Thakkar, Kenneth Y. Goldberg, Jitendra Malik |
ICRA | 4 |
| 2022 | Studying Bias in GANs Through the Lens of Race
Vongani H. Maluleke, Neerja Thakkar, Tim Brooks, Ethan Weber, Trevor Darrell, Alexei A. Efros, Angjoo Kanazawa, Devin Guillory |
ECCV (13) | 2 |
| 2019 | Balancing sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing TCR groups by CDR sequence similarityabstractBACKGROUND: Repertoire sequencing is enabling deep explorations into the cellular immune response, including the characterization of commonalities and differences among T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires from different individuals, pathologies, and antigen specificities. In seeking to understand the generality of patterns observed in different groups of TCRs, it is necessary to balance how well each pattern represents the diversity among TCRs from one group (sensitivity) vs. how many TCRs from other groups it also represents (specificity). The variable complementarity determining regions (CDRs), particularly the third CDRs (CDR3s) interact with major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-presented epitopes from putative antigens, and thus encode the determinants of recognition. RESULTS: We here systematically characterize the predictive power that can be obtained from CDR3 sequences, using representative, readily interpretable methods for evaluating CDR sequence similarity and then clustering and classifying sequences based on similarity. An initial analysis of CDR3s of known structure, clustered by structural similarity, helps calibrate the limits of sequence diversity among CDRs that might have a common mode of interaction with presented epitopes. Subsequent analyses demonstrate that this same range of sequence similarity strikes a favorable specificity/sensitivity balance in distinguishing twins from non-twins based on overall CDR3 repertoires, classifying CDR3 repertoires by antigen specificity, and distinguishing general pathologies. CONCLUSION: We conclude that within a fairly broad range of sequence similarity, matching CDR3 sequences are likely to share specificities. Neerja Thakkar, Chris Bailey-Kellogg |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |