Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Biberger

dblp:241/4242 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6314-1914ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 77% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing
audio quality assessment
0.412019
Subjective and Objective Assessment of Monaural and Binaural Aspects of Audio Quality · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2019
Multimedia systems and quality of experience › subjective quality assessment
subjective listening test
0.112019
Subjective and Objective Assessment of Monaural and Binaural Aspects of Audio Quality · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model combination · 0.4GPSM-q · 0.4BAM-Q · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Speech Intelligibility Prediction for Hearing-Impaired Listeners with the LEAP Model
abstract
3498
Jana Roßbach, Rainer Huber, Saskia Röttges, Christopher F. Hauth, Thomas Biberger, Thomas Brand, Bernd T. Meyer, Jan Rennies
INTERSPEECH5
2019 Subjective and Objective Assessment of Monaural and Binaural Aspects of Audio Quality
abstract
Recently, the binaural auditory-model-based quality prediction (BAM-Q) was successfully applied to predict binaural audio quality degradations, while the generalized power-spectrum model for quality (GPSM$^\text{q}$) has been demonstrated to account for a large variety of monaural signal distortions. For many applications, a combined monaural and binaural model would be advantageous, however, the contribution of monaural and binaural quality aspects to overall (spatial) quality is not conclusively clarified. Thus, the current study systematically investigated overall audio quality in a listening experiment for monaural and binaural distortions on music, speech, and noise, applied either in isolation or in combination. The resulting database was used for assessing different methods for combining BAM-Q and GPSM$^\text{q}$to joint overall audio predictions for monaural and binaural signal distortions. It was investigated, if monaural or binaural quality aspects contribute stronger to overall audio quality. The results indicate that overall audio quality depends on the lower quality aspect, either monaural or binaural.
Jan-Hendrik Flesner, Thomas Biberger, Stephan Dieter Ewert
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.2