Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nihar Dasari
dblp:241/4301
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 56% Integrated circuit design · 44% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design › heterogeneous integration
chiplet-based design |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Architecture, Chip, and Package Co-design Flow for 2.5D IC Design Enabling Heterogeneous IP Reuse · DAC 2019 |
Electronic design automation
design flow |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Architecture, Chip, and Package Co-design Flow for 2.5D IC Design Enabling Heterogeneous IP Reuse · DAC 2019 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Architecture, Chip, and Package Codesign Flow for Interposer-Based 2.5-D Chiplet Integration Enabling Heterogeneous IP ReuseabstractA new trend in system-on-chip (SoC) design is chiplet-based IP reuse using 2.5-D integration. Complete electronic systems can be created through the integration of chiplets on an interposer, rather than through a monolithic flow. This approach expands access to a large catalog of off-the-shelf intellectual properties (IPs), allows reuse of them, and enables heterogeneous integration of blocks in different technologies. In this article, we present a highly integrated design flow that encompasses architecture, circuit, and package to build and simulate heterogeneous 2.5-D designs. Our target design is 64core architecture based on Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC)-V processor. We first chipletize each IP by adding logical protocol translators and physical interface modules. We convert a given register transfer level (RTL) for 64-core processor into chiplets, which are enhanced with our centralized network-onchip. Next, we use our tool to obtain physical layouts, which is subsequently used to synthesize chip-to-chip I/O drivers and these chiplets are placed/routed on a silicon interposer. Our package models are used to calculate power, performance, and area (PPA) and reliability of 2.5-D design. Our design space exploration (DSE) study shows that 2.5-D integration incurs 1.29× power and 2.19× area overheads compared with 2-D counterpart. Moreover, we perform DSE studies for power delivery scheme and interposer technology to investigate the tradeoffs in 2.5-D integrated chip (IC) designs. Gauthaman Murali, Heechun Park, Eric Qin 0001, Hyoukjun Kwon, Venakata Chaitanya Krishna Chekuri, Nael Mizanur Rahman, Nihar Dasari, Minah Lee, Hakki Mert Torun, Kallol Roy, Madhavan Swaminathan, Saibal Mukhopadhyay, Tushar Krishna, Sung Kyu Lim |
IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. | 8 |
| 2019 | Architecture, Chip, and Package Co-design Flow for 2.5D IC Design Enabling Heterogeneous IP ReuseabstractA new trend in complex SoC design is chiplet-based IP reuse using 2.5D integration. In this paper we present a highly-integrated design flow that encompasses architecture, circuit, and package to build and simulate heterogeneous 2.5D designs. We chipletize each IP by adding logical protocol translators and physical interface modules. These chiplets are placed/routed on a silicon interposer next. Our package models are then used to calculate PPA and signal/power integrity of the overall system. Our design space exploration study using our tool flow shows that 2.5D integration incurs 2.1x PPA overhead compared with 2D SoC counterpart. Gauthaman Murali, Heechun Park, Eric Qin 0001, Hyoukjun Kwon, Venakata Chaitanya Krishna Chekuri, Nihar Dasari, Minah Lee, Hakki Mert Torun, Kallol Roy, Madhavan Swaminathan, Saibal Mukhopadhyay, Tushar Krishna, Sung Kyu Lim |
DAC | 7 |
| 2019 | A Spectral Convolutional Net for Co-Optimization of Integrated Voltage Regulators and Embedded InductorsabstractIntegrated voltage regulators (IVR) with embedded inductors is an emerging technology that provides point-of-load voltage regulation to high-performance systems. Conventional two-step approaches to the design of IVRs can suffer from suboptimal design as the optimal inductor depends on the characteristics of the buck converter (BC). Furthermore, inductor-level trade-offs such as AC and DC resistance, inductance and area can not be determined independently from the BC. This co-dependency of the BC and the inductor creates a highly non-linear response surface, which raises the necessity of co-optimization, involving multiple time-consuming electromagnetics (EM) simulations. In this paper, we propose a machine learning based optimization methodology that eliminates EM simulations from the optimization loop to significantly reduce the optimization complexity. A novel technique named as Spectral Transposed Convolutional Neural Network (S-TCNN) is presented to derive an accurate predictive model of the inductor frequency response using a small amount of training data. The derived S-TCNN is then used along with a time-domain model of the BC to perform multi-objective optimization that approximates the Pareto front for 5 objectives, namely inductor area, BC settling time, voltage conversion efficiency, droop and ripple. The resulting methodology provides multiple Pareto optimal inductors in an efficient and fully automated fashion, thereby allows to rapidly determine the optimal trade-offs for possibly contradicting design objectives. We demonstrate the proposed framework on co-optimization of solenoidal inductor with magnetic core and BC that are integrated on silicon interposer. Hakki Mert Torun, Huan Yu 0011, Nihar Dasari, Venakata Chaitanya Krishna Chekuri, Sung Kyu Lim, Saibal Mukhopadhyay, Madhavan Swaminathan |
ICCAD | 3 |
| 2019 | Automatic GDSII Generator for On-Chip Voltage Regulator for Easy Integration in Digital SoCsabstractThis paper demonstrates an electronic design automation (EDA) tool flow for generation of digitally controlled high-bandwidth on-chip voltage regulators for easy integration in a digital SoC. The proposed flow optimizes the control loop and power stage of an integrated voltage regulator (IVR) to achieve desired transient performance and/or efficiency. The GDSII of the optimized IVR is generated by coupling logic synthesis and physical design of digital blocks, automated generation of power stage layout, and top-level integration of all modules. We demonstrate the developed flow for inductive IVRs in 130nm and 65nm CMOS process. We show feasibility of fast design space exploration, optimization, layout generation as well as automated integration of the generated IVR with a RISC-V core. Venakata Chaitanya Krishna Chekuri, Nihar Dasari, Saibal Mukhopadhyay |
ISLPED | 2 |