Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cornelius Fritz

dblp:241/6946 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-7781-223XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.812024
A Strategic Model of Software Dependency Networks · EC 2024
Software maintenance and evolution › software dependencies
software dependency networks
0.812024
A Strategic Model of Software Dependency Networks · EC 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › network economics
network formation
0.812024
A Strategic Model of Software Dependency Networks · EC 2024
Systems and software security › software supply chain security
vulnerability propagation
0.212024
A Strategic Model of Software Dependency Networks · EC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical network formation models · 2.3epidemic spreading models · 2.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Strategic Model of Software Dependency Networks
abstract
Software development is a collaborative effort that leverages existing code, which reduces the cost of developing new software. That said, leveraging existing code exposes coders to vulnerabilities, because existing code might contain programming bugs. We study the formation of dependency networks among software repositories, guided by a strategic model of network formation with observable and unobservable heterogeneity. We estimate costs, benefits, and link externalities of a network of 696, 790 directed dependencies between 35, 473 repositories of the Rust programming language using a scalable statistical algorithm. We find evidence of a positive externality exerted on other coders when coders create dependencies. What is more, we show that coders are likely to link to more popular packages of the same and of other software types. We adopt models for the spread of infectious diseases to measure a package's systemicness as the number of downstream packages a vulnerability would affect. Systemicness is highly skewed with the most systemic repository affecting almost 90% of all repositories only two steps away. Finally, we show that protecting only the ten most important repositories reduces vulnerability contagion by nearly 40%.
Cornelius Fritz, Co-Pierre Georg, Angelo Mele, Michael Schweinberger
EC1
2024 How Inverse Conditional Flows Can Serve as a Substitute for Distributional Regression
abstract
Neural network representations of simple models, such as linear regression, are being studied increasingly to better understand the underlying principles of deep learning algorithms. However, neural representations of distributional regression models, such as the Cox model, have received little attention so far. We close this gap by proposing a framework for distributional regression using inverse flow transformations (DRIFT), which includes neural representations of the aforementioned models. We empirically demonstrate that the neural representations of models in DRIFT can serve as a substitute for their classical statistical counterparts in several applications involving continuous, ordered, time-series, and survival outcomes. We confirm that models in DRIFT empirically match the performance of several statistical methods in terms of estimation of partial effects, prediction, and aleatoric uncertainty quantification. DRIFT covers both interpretable statistical models and flexible neural networks opening up new avenues in both statistical modeling and deep learning.
Lucas Kook, Chris Kolb, Philipp Schiele, Daniel Dold, Marcel Arpogaus, Cornelius Fritz, Philipp F. M. Baumann, Philipp Kopper, Tobias Pielok, Emilio Dorigatti, David Rügamer
UAI6