While probabilistic graphical models are a central tool for reasoning under uncertainty in AI, they are in general not as expressive as deep neural models, and inference is notoriously hard and slow. In contrast, deep probabilistic models such as sum-product networks (SPNs) capture joint distributions and ensure tractable inference, but still lack the expressive power of intractable models based on deep neural networks. In this paper, we introduce conditional SPNs (CSPNs)—conditional density estimators for multivariate and potentially hybrid domains—and develop a structure-learning approach that derives both the structure and parameters of CSPNs from data. To harness the expressive power of deep neural networks (DNNs), we also show how to realize CSPNs by conditioning the parameters of vanilla SPNs on the input using DNNs as gate functions. In contrast to SPNs whose high-level structure can not be explicitly manipulated, CSPNs can naturally be used as tractable building blocks of deep probabilistic models whose modular structure maintains high-level interpretability. In experiments, we demonstrate that CSPNs are competitive with other probabilistic models and yield superior performance on structured prediction, conditional density estimation, auto-regressive image modeling, and multilabel image classification. In particular, we show that employing CSPNs as encoders and decoders within variational autoencoders can help to relax the commonly used mean field assumption and in turn improve performance.

Explaining black-box models such as deep neural networks is becoming increasingly important as it helps to boost trust and debugging. Popular forms of explanations map the features to a vector indicating their individual importance to a decision on the instance-level. They can then be used to prevent the model from learning the wrong bias in data possibly due to ambiguity. For instance, Ross et al.'s ``right for the right reasons'' propagates user explanations backwards to the network by formulating differentiable constraints based on input gradients. Unfortunately, input gradients as well as many other widely used explanation methods form an approximation of the decision boundary and assume the underlying model to be fixed. Here, we demonstrate how to make use of influence functions---a well known robust statistic---in the constraints to correct the model’s behaviour more effectively. Our empirical evidence demonstrates that this ``right for better reasons''(RBR) considerably reduces the time to correct the classifier at training time and boosts the quality of explanations at inference time compared to input gradients. Besides, we also showcase the effectiveness of RBR in correcting "Clever Hans"-like behaviour in real, high-dimensional domain.

We investigate the notion of independence in abstract argumentation, i.e., the question of whether the evaluation of one set of arguments is independent of the evaluation of another set of arguments, given that we already know the status of a third set of arguments. We provide a semantic definition of this notion and develop a method to discover independencies based on transforming an argumentation framework into a DAG on which we then apply the well-known d-separation criterion. We also introduce the SCC Markov property for argumentation semantics, which generalises the Markov property from the classical acyclic case and guarantees the soundness of our approach.