Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Victor Lei
dblp:241/7116
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine Learning Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Instruments · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
heterogeneous treatment effect estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine Learning Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Instruments · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
instrumental variable |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine Learning Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Instruments · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › online controlled experiments
a/b testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine Learning Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Instruments · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › causal inference
causal effect estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine Learning Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Instruments · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 0.8neyman orthogonality · 0.8neural network · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Machine Learning Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with InstrumentsabstractWe consider the estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects with arbitrary machine learning methods in the presence of unobserved confounders with the aid of a valid instrument. Such settings arise in A/B tests with an intent-to-treat structure, where the experimenter randomizes over which user will receive a recommendation to take an action, and we are interested in the effect of the downstream action. We develop a statistical learning approach to the estimation of heterogeneous effects, reducing the problem to the minimization of an appropriate loss function that depends on a set of auxiliary models (each corresponding to a separate prediction task). The reduction enables the use of all recent algorithmic advances (e.g. neural nets, forests). We show that the estimated effect model is robust to estimation errors in the auxiliary models, by showing that the loss satisfies a Neyman orthogonality criterion. Our approach can be used to estimate projections of the true effect model on simpler hypothesis spaces. When these spaces are parametric, then the parameter estimates are asymptotically normal, which enables construction of confidence sets. We applied our method to estimate the effect of membership on downstream webpage engagement for a major travel webpage, using as an instrument an intent-to-treat A/B test among 4 million users, where some users received an easier membership sign-up process. We also validate our method on synthetic data and on public datasets for the effects of schooling on income. Vasilis Syrgkanis, Victor Lei, Miruna Oprescu, Maggie Hei, Keith Battocchi, Greg Lewis |
NeurIPS | 2 |