Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Bastien van Delft

dblp:241/7189 · also Bastien Van Delft · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 57% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 10%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
CODE: Confident Ordinary Differential Editing · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
image editing
0.912025
CODE: Confident Ordinary Differential Editing · AAAI 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration
blind image restoration
0.912025
CODE: Confident Ordinary Differential Editing · AAAI 2025
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.912025
CODE: Confident Ordinary Differential Editing · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation
0.512021
TTT++: When Does Self-Supervised Test-Time Training Fail or Thrive? · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › test-time adaptation
test-time training
0.512021
TTT++: When Does Self-Supervised Test-Time Training Fail or Thrive? · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.112021
TTT++: When Does Self-Supervised Test-Time Training Fail or Thrive? · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.112021
TTT++: When Does Self-Supervised Test-Time Training Fail or Thrive? · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probability flow ODE · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7confidence interval-based clipping · 1.7moment matching · 0.5feature alignment · 0.5batch-queue decoupling · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CODE: Confident Ordinary Differential Editing
abstract
Conditioning image generation facilitates seamless editing and the creation of photorealistic images. However, conditioning on noisy or Out-of-Distribution (OoD) images poses significant challenges, particularly in balancing fidelity to the input and realism of the output. We introduce Confident Ordinary Differential Editing (CODE), a novel approach for image synthesis that effectively handles OoD guidance images. Utilizing a diffusion model as a generative prior, CODE enhances images through score-based updates along the probability-flow Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) trajectory. This method requires no task-specific training, handcrafted modules, or assumptions, and is compatible with any diffusion model. Positioned at the intersection of conditional image generation and blind image restoration, CODE operates in a fully blind manner, relying solely on a pre-trained generative model. Our method introduces an alternative approach to blind restoration: instead of targeting a specific ground truth image based on assumptions about the underlying corruption, CODE aims to increase the likelihood of the input image while maintaining fidelity. This results in the most probable in-distribution image around the input. Our contributions are twofold. First, CODE introduces a novel editing method based on ODE providing enhanced control, realism, and fidelity compared to SDE-based counterpart. Second, we introduce a confidence interval-based clipping method, which improves CODE’s effectiveness by allowing it to disregard certain pixels or information, thus enhancing the restoration process in a blind manner. Experimental results demonstrate CODE’s effectiveness over existing methods, particularly in scenarios involving severe degradation or OoD inputs.
Bastien van Delft, Tommaso Martorella, Alexandre Alahi
AAAI1
2021 TTT++: When Does Self-Supervised Test-Time Training Fail or Thrive?
abstract
Test-time training (TTT) through self-supervised learning (SSL) is an emerging paradigm to tackle distributional shifts. Despite encouraging results, it remains unclear when this approach thrives or fails. In this work, we first provide an in-depth look at its limitations and show that TTT can possibly deteriorate, instead of improving, the test-time performance in the presence of severe distribution shifts. To address this issue, we introduce a test-time feature alignment strategy utilizing offline feature summarization and online moment matching, which regularizes adaptation without revisiting training data. We further scale this strategy in the online setting through batch-queue decoupling to enable robust moment estimates even with limited batch size. Given aligned feature distributions, we then shed light on the strong potential of TTT by theoretically analyzing its performance post adaptation. This analysis motivates our use of more informative self-supervision in the form of contrastive learning for visual recognition problems. We empirically demonstrate that our modified version of test-time training, termed TTT++, outperforms state-of-the-art methods by significant margins on several benchmarks. Our result indicates that storing and exploiting extra information, in addition to model parameters, can be a promising direction towards robust test-time adaptation.
Yuejiang Liu, Parth Kothari, Bastien van Delft, Baptiste Bellot-Gurlet, Taylor Mordan, Alexandre Alahi
NeurIPS3