Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuren Cao
dblp:241/7221
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 82% Face, body and person analysis · 18% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › local explanation
instance-wise feature selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarial Infidelity Learning for Model Interpretation · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarial Infidelity Learning for Model Interpretation · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › post-hoc explanation
model-agnostic explanation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adversarial Infidelity Learning for Model Interpretation · KDD 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Additive Adversarial Learning for Unbiased Authentication · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
person re-identification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Additive Adversarial Learning for Unbiased Authentication · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
feature selection · 0.4adversarial infidelity learning · 0.4disentangled representation learning · 0.4additive adversarial learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Adversarial Infidelity Learning for Model InterpretationabstractModel interpretation is essential in data mining and knowledge discovery. It can help understand the intrinsic model working mechanism and check if the model has undesired characteristics. A popular way of performing model interpretation is Instance-wise Feature Selection (IFS), which provides an importance score of each feature representing the data samples to explain how the model generates the specific output. In this paper, we propose a Model-agnostic Effective Efficient Direct (MEED) IFS framework for model interpretation, mitigating concerns about sanity, combinatorial shortcuts, model identifiability, and information transmission. Also, we focus on the following setting: using selected features to directly predict the output of the given model, which serves as a primary evaluation metric for model-interpretation methods. Apart from the features, we involve the output of the given model as an additional input to learn an explainer based on more accurate information. To learn the explainer, besides fidelity, we propose an Adversarial Infidelity Learning (AIL) mechanism to boost the explanation learning by screening relatively unimportant features. Through theoretical and experimental analysis, we show that our AIL mechanism can help learn the desired conditional distribution between selected features and targets. Moreover, we extend our framework by integrating efficient interpretation methods as proper priors to provide a warm start. Comprehensive empirical evaluation results are provided by quantitative metrics and human evaluation to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our proposed method. Our code is publicly available online at https://github.com/langlrsw/MEED. Jian Liang 0001, Yuren Cao, Fei Wang 0001 |
KDD | 3 |
| 2019 | Additive Adversarial Learning for Unbiased AuthenticationabstractAuthentication is a task aiming to confirm the truth between data instances and personal identities. Typical authentication applications include face recognition, person re-identification, authentication based on mobile devices and so on. The recently-emerging data-driven authentication process may encounter undesired biases, i.e., the models are often trained in one domain (e.g., for people wearing spring outfits) while required to apply in other domains (e.g., they change the clothes to summer outfits). To address this issue, we propose a novel two-stage method that disentangles the class/identity from domain-differences, and we consider multiple types of domain-difference. In the first stage, we learn disentangled representations by a one-versus-rest disentangle learning (OVRDL) mechanism. In the second stage, we improve the disentanglement by an additive adversarial learning (AAL) mechanism. Moreover, we discuss the necessity to avoid a learning dilemma due to disentangling causally related types of domain-difference. Comprehensive evaluation results demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method. Jian Liang 0002, Yuren Cao, Chenbin Zhang, Shiyu Chang, Zenglin Xu |
CVPR | 2 |