Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Lew
dblp:241/7295
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8209-3604ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Autonomous driving · 15% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
masked pre-training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Faults to Features: Pretraining to Learn Robust Representations against Sensor Failures · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Faults to Features: Pretraining to Learn Robust Representations against Sensor Failures · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Faults to Features: Pretraining to Learn Robust Representations against Sensor Failures · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › fault tolerance
sensor failure robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Faults to Features: Pretraining to Learn Robust Representations against Sensor Failures · NeurIPS 2025 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Robotic Table Wiping via Reinforcement Learning and Whole-body Trajectory Optimization · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning › robot policy learning
vision-based policy learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Robotic Table Wiping via Reinforcement Learning and Whole-body Trajectory Optimization · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
dynamics learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Safe Active Dynamics Learning and Control: A Sequential Exploration-Exploitation Framework · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
safe control |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Safe Active Dynamics Learning and Control: A Sequential Exploration-Exploitation Framework · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
vehicle dynamics modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | From Faults to Features: Pretraining to Learn Robust Representations against Sensor Failures · NeurIPS 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
whole-body trajectory optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Robotic Table Wiping via Reinforcement Learning and Whole-body Trajectory Optimization · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
safe deployment |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Safe Active Dynamics Learning and Control: A Sequential Exploration-Exploitation Framework · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential quadratic programming · 0.9self-supervised learning · 0.9masking · 0.9conditional value-at-risk · 0.9GPU parallelization · 0.9stochastic differential equation · 0.7sim-to-real transfer · 0.7last-layer adaptation · 0.6confidence set · 0.6bayesian meta-learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Risk-Averse Model Predictive Control for Racing in Adverse ConditionsabstractModel predictive control (MPC) algorithms can be sensitive to model mismatch when used in challenging nonlinear control tasks. In particular, the performance of MPC for vehicle control at the limits of handling suffers when the underlying model overestimates the vehicle's performance capabilities. In this work, we propose a risk-averse MPC framework that explicitly accounts for uncertainty over friction limits and tire parameters. Our approach leverages a sample-based approximation of an optimal control problem with a conditional value at risk (CVaR) constraint. This sample-based formulation enables planning with a set of expressive vehicle dynamics models using different tire parameters. Moreover, this formulation enables efficient numerical resolution via sequential quadratic programming and GPU parallelization. Experiments on a Lexus LC 500 show that risk-averse MPC unlocks reliable performance, while a deterministic baseline that plans using a single dynamics model may lose control of the vehicle in adverse road conditions. Thomas Lew, Marcus Greiff, Franck Djeumou, Makoto Suminaka, John K. Subosits |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2025 | From Faults to Features: Pretraining to Learn Robust Representations against Sensor FailuresabstractMachine learning models play a key role in safety-critical applications, such as autonomous vehicles and advanced driver assistance systems, where their robustness during inference is essential to ensure reliable operation. Sensor faults, however, can corrupt input signals, potentially leading to severe model failures that compromise reliability. In this context, pretraining emerges as a powerful approach for learning expressive representations applicable to various downstream tasks. Among existing techniques, masking represents a promising direction for learning representations that are robust to corrupted input data. In this work, we extend this concept by specifically targeting robustness to sensor outages during pretraining. We propose a self-supervised masking scheme that simulates common sensor failures and explicitly trains the model to recover the original signal. We demonstrate that the resulting representations significantly improve the robustness of predictions to seen and unseen sensor failures on a vehicle dynamics dataset, maintaining
strong downstream performance under both nominal and various fault conditions. As a practical application, we deploy the method on a modified Lexus LC 500 and show that the pretrained model successfully operates as a substitute for a physical sensor in a closed-loop control system. In this autonomous racing application, a supervised baseline trained without sensor failures may cause the vehicle to leave the track. In contrast, a model trained using the proposed masking scheme enables reliable racing performance in the presence of sensor failures. Jens U. Brandt, Noah Christoph Pütz, Marcus Greiff, Thomas Lew, John K. Subosits, Marc Hilbert, Thomas Bartz-Beielstein |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2025 | Estimating the Convex Hull of the Image of a Set with Smooth Boundary: Error Bounds and Applications
Thomas Lew, Riccardo Bonalli, Lucas Janson, Marco Pavone 0001 |
Discret. Comput. Geom. | 1 |
| 2023 | Robotic Table Wiping via Reinforcement Learning and Whole-body Trajectory OptimizationabstractWe propose a framework to enable multipurpose assistive mobile robots to autonomously wipe tables to clean spills and crumbs. This problem is challenging, as it requires planning wiping actions while reasoning over uncertain latent dynamics of crumbs and spills captured via high-dimensional visual observations. Simultaneously, we must guarantee constraints satisfaction to enable safe deployment in unstructured cluttered environments. To tackle this problem, we first propose a stochastic differential equation to model crumbs and spill dynamics and absorption with a robot wiper. Using this model, we train a vision-based policy for planning wiping actions in simulation using reinforcement learning (RL). To enable zero-shot sim-to-real deployment, we dovetail the RL policy with a whole-body trajectory optimization framework to compute base and arm joint trajectories that execute the desired wiping motions while guaranteeing constraints satisfaction. We extensively validate our approach in simulation and on hardware. Video of experiments: https://youtu.be/inORKP4F3EI Thomas Lew, Sumeet Singh, Mario Prats, Jeffrey T. Bingham, Jonathan Weisz, Benjie Holson, Vikas Sindhwani, Yao Lu 0006, Fei Xia 0002, Peng Xu 0010, Tingnan Zhang, Jie Tan 0001, Montserrat Gonzalez |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2022 | Robust-RRT: Probabilistically-Complete Motion Planning for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
Albert Wu, Thomas Lew, Kiril Solovey, Edward Schmerling, Marco Pavone 0001 |
ISRR | 2 |
| 2022 | Safe Active Dynamics Learning and Control: A Sequential Exploration-Exploitation FrameworkabstractSafe deployment of autonomous robots in diverse scenarios requires agents that are capable of efficiently adapting to new environments while satisfying constraints. In this article, we propose a practical and theoretically justified approach to maintain safety in the presence of dynamics uncertainty. Our approach leverages Bayesian meta-learning with last-layer adaptation. The expressiveness of neural-network features trained offline, paired with efficient last-layer online adaptation, enables the derivation of tight confidence sets, which contract around the true dynamics as the model adapts online. We exploit these confidence sets to plan trajectories that guarantee the safety of the system. Our approach handles problems with high dynamics uncertainty, where reaching the goal safely is potentially initially infeasible, by firstexploringto gather data and reduce uncertainty, before autonomouslyexploitingthe acquired information to safely perform the task. Under reasonable assumptions, we prove that our framework guarantees the high-probability satisfaction of all constraints at all times jointly, i.e., over the total task duration. This theoretical analysis also motivates two regularizers of last-layer meta-learning models that improve online adaptation capabilities as well as performance by reducing the size of the confidence sets. We extensively demonstrate our approach in simulation and on hardware. Thomas Lew, Apoorva Sharma, James Harrison, Andrew Bylard, Marco Pavone 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 1 |
| 2019 | Contact Inertial Odometry: Collisions are your Friends
Thomas Lew, Tomoki Enmei, David D. Fan, Tara Bartlett, Angel Santamaria-Navarro, Rohan Thakker, Ali-akbar Agha-mohammadi |
ISRR | 1 |