Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anthony Fulginiti

dblp:241/7995 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 67% Approximation and online algorithms · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.412019
Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
group fairness
0.412019
Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.412019
Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms
0.412019
Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
graph covering
0.412019
Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

robust optimization · 0.8approximation algorithm · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems
abstract
Fueled by algorithmic advances, AI algorithms are increasingly being deployed in settings subject to unanticipated challenges with complex social effects. Motivated by real-world deployment of AI driven, social-network based suicide prevention and landslide risk management interventions, this paper focuses on a robust graph covering problem subject to group fairness constraints. We show that, in the absence of fairness constraints, state-of-the-art algorithms for the robust graph covering problem result in biased node coverage: they tend to discriminate individuals (nodes) based on membership in traditionally marginalized groups. To remediate this issue, we propose a novel formulation of the robust covering problem with fairness constraints and a tractable approximation scheme applicable to real world instances. We provide a formal analysis of the price of group fairness (PoF) for this problem, where we show that uncertainty can lead to greater PoF. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several real-world social networks. Our method yields competitive node coverage while significantly improving group fairness relative to state-of-the-art methods.
Aida Rahmattalabi, Phebe Vayanos, Anthony Fulginiti, Eric Rice, Bryan Wilder, Amulya Yadav, Milind Tambe
NeurIPS3