Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anthony Fulginiti
dblp:241/7995
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 67% Approximation and online algorithms · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
group fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
graph covering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering Problems · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robust optimization · 0.8approximation algorithm · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Exploring Algorithmic Fairness in Robust Graph Covering ProblemsabstractFueled by algorithmic advances, AI algorithms are increasingly being deployed in settings subject to unanticipated challenges with complex social effects. Motivated by real-world deployment of AI driven, social-network based suicide prevention and landslide risk management interventions, this paper focuses on a robust graph covering problem subject to group fairness constraints. We show that, in the absence of fairness constraints, state-of-the-art algorithms for the robust graph covering problem result in biased node coverage: they tend to discriminate individuals (nodes) based on membership in traditionally marginalized groups. To remediate this issue, we propose a novel formulation of the robust covering problem with fairness constraints and a tractable approximation scheme applicable to real world instances. We provide a formal analysis of the price of group fairness (PoF) for this problem, where we show that uncertainty can lead to greater PoF. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several real-world social networks. Our method yields competitive node coverage while significantly improving group fairness relative to state-of-the-art methods. Aida Rahmattalabi, Phebe Vayanos, Anthony Fulginiti, Eric Rice, Bryan Wilder, Amulya Yadav, Milind Tambe |
NeurIPS | 3 |