Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chandan Prakash

dblp:241/8183 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-0401-0356ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 87% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis
0.412019
BuRRiTo: A Framework to Extract, Specify, Verify and Analyze Business Rules · ASE 2019
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements elicitation
requirements extraction
0.412019
BuRRiTo: A Framework to Extract, Specify, Verify and Analyze Business Rules · ASE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 0.4semantic querying · 0.4natural language processing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 From Regulatory Text to Executable Configuration: A Neuro-Symbolic Architecture for Automated Enterprise Software Systems
Chandan Prakash, Pavan Kumar Chittimalli, Ravindra Naik
ENASE (1)1
2019 BuRRiTo: A Framework to Extract, Specify, Verify and Analyze Business Rules
abstract
An enterprise system operates business by providing various services that are guided by set of certain business rules (BR) and constraints. These BR are usually written using plain Natural Language in operating procedures, terms and conditions, and other documents or in source code of legacy enterprise systems. For implementing the BR in a software system, expressing them as UML use-case specifications, or preparing for Merger & Acquisition (M&A) activity, analysts manually interpret the documents or try to identify constraints from the source code, leading to potential discrepancies and ambiguities. These issues in the software system can be resolved only after testing, which is a very tedious and expensive activity. To minimize such errors and efforts, we propose BuRRiTo framework consisting of automatic extraction of BR by mining documents and source code, ability to clean them of various anomalies like inconsistency, redundancies, conflicts, etc. and able to analyze the functional gaps present and performing semantic querying and searching.
Pavan Kumar Chittimalli, Kritika Anand, Shrishti Pradhan, Sayandeep Mitra, Chandan Prakash, Rohit Shere, Ravindra Naik
ASE5
2018 MatGap: A Systematic Approach to Perform Match and Gap Analysis among SBVR-Based Domain Specific Business Rules
abstract
In the modern age, the need for automation has led to Business Organizations representing their functionality as structured Business Rules. SBVR has come up as an universally popular format for representation of Business Rules. The presence of different Business Organizations working in a particular real life domain results in generation of different rules for each of the organization. Due to the varying business practices, like mergers & acquisitions, upgrades, incorporation of a new application, etc., it becomes necessary to compare a set of Business Rules of a particular organization with the rules of a reference model, to get a measure of similarity among the business functionality of the two. Presently, this comparison is carried out manually by business experts or by executing the rules of one organization with the data of another and checking if they are compliant. Both the approaches are extremely tedious and expensive as modern organizations have huge rule sets and data sets.We present MatGap, a tool which performs a systematic Match and Gap Analysis between two sets of SBVR-based Business Rules applicable to a specific domain, using Global Vectors(GloVe) model and SMT-LIBv2. The analysis report gives a measure of Match among the rules and entities, thus providing the best alignment and aids to identify the representational Gaps(if any) among the rules and entities. The tool also checks whether the embedded logic in the reference Business Rule set is covered by the other Rule set, thus highlighting the business functionality gap that is present in the latter.
Sayandeep Mitra, Chandan Prakash, Shayak Chakraborty, Pavan Kumar Chittimalli
APSEC2