Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ishaan Gupta

dblp:241/8255 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8934-9919ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.912025
GenomeDecoder: inferring segmental duplications in highly repetitive genomic regions · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome organization
0.912025
GenomeDecoder: inferring segmental duplications in highly repetitive genomic regions · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

genomedecoder · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 GenomeDecoder: inferring segmental duplications in highly repetitive genomic regions
abstract
MOTIVATION: The emergence of the 'telomere-to-telomere' genomics brought the challenge of identifying segmental duplications (SDs) in complete genomes. It further opened a possibility for identifying the differences in SDs across individual human genomes and studying the SD evolution. These newly emerged challenges require algorithms for reconstructing SDs in the most complex genomic regions that evaded all previous attempts to analyze their architecture, such as rapidly evolving immunoglobulin loci. RESULTS: We describe the GenomeDecoder algorithm for inferring SDs and apply it to analyzing genomic architectures of various loci in primate genomes. Our analysis revealed that multiple duplications/deletions led to a rapid birth/death of immunoglobulin genes within the human population and large changes in genomic architecture of immunoglobulin loci across primate genomes. Comparison of immunoglobulin loci across primate genomes suggests that they are subjected to diversifying selection. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GenomeDecoder is available at https://github.com/ZhangZhenmiao/GenomeDecoder. The software version and test data used in this paper are uploaded to https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14753844.
Zhenmiao Zhang, Ishaan Gupta, Pavel A. Pevzner
Bioinform.2
2023 A systematic comparison of human mitochondrial genome assembly tools
abstract
BACKGROUND: Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the host cell and encode independent genomic information throughout their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology and phylogenetics. Various assemblers capable of generating complete mitochondrial genomes are being continuously developed. These tools often use whole-genome sequencing data as an input containing reads from the mitochondrial genome. Till now, no published work has explored the systematic comparison of all the available tools for assembling human mitochondrial genomes using short-read sequencing data. This evaluation is required to identify the best tool that can be well-optimized for small-scale projects or even national-level research. RESULTS: In this study, we have tested the mitochondrial genome assemblers for both simulated datasets and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets of humans. For the highest computational setting of 16 computational threads with the simulated dataset having 1000X read depth, MitoFlex took the least execution time of 69 s, and IOGA took the longest execution time of 1278 s. NOVOPlasty utilized the least computational memory of approximately 0.098 GB for the same setting, whereas IOGA utilized the highest computational memory of 11.858 GB. In the case of WGS datasets for humans, GetOrganelle and MitoFlex performed the best in capturing the SNPs information with a mean F1-score of 0.919 at the sequencing depth of 10X. MToolBox and NOVOPlasty performed consistently across all sequencing depths with a mean F1 score of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the overall performance metrics and consistency in assembly quality for all sequencing data, MToolBox performed the best. However, NOVOPlasty was the second fastest tool in execution time despite being single-threaded, and it utilized the least computational resources among all the assemblers when tested on simulated datasets. Therefore, NOVOPlasty may be more practical when there is a significant sample size and a lack of computational resources. Besides, as long-read sequencing gains popularity, mitochondrial genome assemblers must be developed to use long-read sequencing data.
Nirmal Singh Mahar, Rohit Satyam, Durai Sundar, Ishaan Gupta
BMC Bioinform.4