Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

R. Alex Hofer

dblp:241/9355 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 28% Learning theory · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 28%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.812024
Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference for Effective Hybrid Evaluation of Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
prediction-powered inference
0.812024
Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference for Effective Hybrid Evaluation of Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation
0.812024
Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference for Effective Hybrid Evaluation of Language Models · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stratified sampling · 0.8confidence intervals · 0.8symbolic knowledge bases · 0.4neural reasoning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference for Effective Hybrid Evaluation of Language Models
abstract
Prediction-powered inference (PPI) is a method that improves statistical estimates based on limited human-labeled data. PPI achieves this by combining small amounts of human-labeled data with larger amounts of data labeled by a reasonably accurate---but potentially biased---automatic system, in a way that results in tighter confidence intervals for certain parameters of interest (e.g., the mean performance of a language model). In this paper, we propose a method called Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference (StratPPI), in which we show that the basic PPI estimates can be considerably improved by employing simple data stratification strategies. Without making any assumptions on the underlying automatic labeling system or data distribution, we derive an algorithm for computing provably valid confidence intervals for parameters of any dimensionality that is based on stratified sampling. In particular, we show both theoretically and empirically that, with appropriate choices of stratification and sample allocation, our approach can provide substantially tighter confidence intervals than unstratified approaches. Specifically, StratPPI is expected to improve in cases where the performance of the autorater varies across different conditional distributions of the target data.
Adam Fisch, Joshua Maynez, R. Alex Hofer, Bhuwan Dhingra, Amir Globerson, William W. Cohen
NeurIPS3
2020 Scalable Neural Methods for Reasoning With a Symbolic Knowledge Base
William W. Cohen, Haitian Sun, R. Alex Hofer, Matthew Siegler
ICLR3