Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Si Kai Lee
dblp:241/9486
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 34% Learning theory · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Inference for High-Dimensional Linear Models via Residual Randomization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized risk minimization › regularized regression
lasso |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Inference for High-Dimensional Linear Models via Residual Randomization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › model robustness
robust inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Inference for High-Dimensional Linear Models via Residual Randomization · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Dual Instrumental Variable Regression · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
instrumental variable regression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Dual Instrumental Variable Regression · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Dual Instrumental Variable Regression · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Dual Instrumental Variable Regression · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
heavy-tailed distribution |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Inference for High-Dimensional Linear Models via Residual Randomization · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic programming · 0.9kernel methods · 0.9residual randomization · 0.5lasso · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Robust Inference for High-Dimensional Linear Models via Residual RandomizationabstractWe propose a residual randomization procedure designed for robust inference using Lasso estimates in the high-dimensional setting. Compared to earlier work that focuses on sub-Gaussian errors, the proposed procedure is designed to work robustly in settings that also include heavy-tailed covariates and errors. Moreover, our procedure can be valid under clustered errors, which is important in practice, but has been largely overlooked by earlier work. Through extensive simulations, we illustrate our method’s wider range of applicability as suggested by theory. In particular, we show that our method outperforms state-of-art methods in challenging, yet more realistic, settings where the distribution of covariates is heavy-tailed or the sample size is small, while it remains competitive in standard, “well behaved" settings previously studied in the literature. Y. Samuel Wang, Si Kai Lee, Panos Toulis, Mladen Kolar |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | Dual Instrumental Variable RegressionabstractWe present a novel algorithm for non-linear instrumental variable (IV) regression, DualIV, which simplifies traditional two-stage methods via a dual formulation. Inspired by problems in stochastic programming, we show that two-stage procedures for non-linear IV regression can be reformulated as a convex-concave saddle-point problem. Our formulation enables us to circumvent the first-stage regression which is a potential bottleneck in real-world applications. We develop a simple kernel-based algorithm with an analytic solution based on this formulation. Empirical results show that we are competitive to existing, more complicated algorithms for non-linear instrumental variable regression. Krikamol Muandet, Arash Mehrjou, Si Kai Lee, Anant Raj |
NeurIPS | 3 |