Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michal Edelstein

dblp:241/9626 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-9126-1617ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › surface parameterization
seamless parametrization
0.512021
PH-CPF: planar hexagonal meshing using coordinate power fields · ACM Trans. Graph. 2021
Geometric modeling and processing › mesh generation
surface meshing
0.512021
PH-CPF: planar hexagonal meshing using coordinate power fields · ACM Trans. Graph. 2021
Geometric modeling and processing
surface parameterization
0.512021
PH-CPF: planar hexagonal meshing using coordinate power fields · ACM Trans. Graph. 2021
Geometric modeling and processing › shape correspondence
non-isometric shape matching
0.412020
ENIGMA: evolutionary non-isometric geometry MAtching · ACM Trans. Graph. 2020
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching
0.412020
ENIGMA: evolutionary non-isometric geometry MAtching · ACM Trans. Graph. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization framework · 0.5coordinate power fields · 0.5sparse landmark correspondence · 0.4evolutionary genetic algorithm · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 PH-CPF: planar hexagonal meshing using coordinate power fields
abstract
We present a new approach for computing planar hexagonal meshes that approximate a given surface, represented as a triangle mesh. Our method is based on two novel technical contributions. First, we introduce Coordinate Power Fields , which are a pair of tangent vector fields on the surface that fulfill a certain continuity constraint. We prove that the fulfillment of this constraint guarantees the existence of a seamless parameterization with quantized rotational jumps, which we then use to regularly remesh the surface. We additionally propose an optimization framework for finding Coordinate Power Fields, which also fulfill additional constraints, such as alignment, sizing and bijectivity. Second, we build upon this framework to address a challenging meshing problem: planar hexagonal meshing. To this end, we suggest a combination of conjugacy, scaling and alignment constraints, which together lead to planarizable hexagons. We demonstrate our approach on a variety of surfaces, automatically generating planar hexagonal meshes on complicated meshes, which were not achievable with existing methods.
Kacper Pluta, Michal Edelstein, Amir Vaxman, Mirela Ben-Chen
ACM Trans. Graph.2
2020 ENIGMA: evolutionary non-isometric geometry MAtching
abstract
In this paper we propose a fully automatic method for shape correspondence that is widely applicable, and especially effective for non isometric shapes and shapes of different topology. We observe that fully-automatic shape correspondence can be decomposed as a hybrid discrete/continuous optimization problem, and we find the best sparse landmark correspondence, whose sparse-to-dense extension minimizes a local metric distortion. To tackle the combinatorial task of landmark correspondence we use an evolutionary genetic algorithm , where the local distortion of the sparse-to-dense extension is used as the objective function. We design novel geometrically guided genetic operators, which, when combined with our objective, are highly effective for non isometric shape matching. Our method outperforms state of the art methods for automatic shape correspondence both quantitatively and qualitatively on challenging datasets.
Michal Edelstein, Danielle Ezuz, Mirela Ben-Chen
ACM Trans. Graph.1