Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuejiao Fei
dblp:241/9669
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
grammatical error correction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Enhancing Grammatical Error Correction Systems with Explanations · ACL (1) 2023 |
Computing education
language learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Enhancing Grammatical Error Correction Systems with Explanations · ACL (1) 2023 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dynamics of Instruction Fine-Tuning for Chinese Large Language ModelsabstractInstruction tuning is a burgeoning method to elicit the general intelligence of Large Language Models (LLMs). While numerous studies have examined the impact of factors such as data volume and model size on English models, the scaling properties of instruction tuning in other languages remain largely unexplored. In this work, we systematically investigate the effects of data quantity, model size, and data construction methods on instruction tuning for Chinese LLMs. We utilize a newly curated dataset, DoIT, which includes over 40,000 high-quality instruction instances covering ten underlying abilities, such as creative writing, code generation, and logical reasoning. Our experiments, conducted on models ranging from 7b to 33b parameters, yield three key findings: (i) While these factors directly affect overall model performance, some abilities are more responsive to scaling, whereas others demonstrate significant resistance. (ii) The scaling sensitivity of different abilities to these factors can be explained by two features: Complexity and Transference. (iii) By tailoring training strategies to their varying sensitivities, specific abilities can be efficiently learned, enhancing performance on two public benchmarks. Chiyu Song, Zhanchao Zhou, Jianhao Yan, Yuejiao Fei, Zhen-Zhong Lan, Yue Zhang 0004 |
COLING | 4 |
| 2023 | Enhancing Grammatical Error Correction Systems with ExplanationsabstractGrammatical error correction systems improve written communication by detecting and correcting language mistakes.To help language learners better understand why the GEC system makes a certain correction, the causes of errors (evidence words) and the corresponding error types are two key factors.To enhance GEC systems with explanations, we introduce EXPECT, a large dataset annotated with evidence words and grammatical error types.We propose several baselines and analysis to understand this task.Furthermore, human evaluation verifies our explainable GEC system's explanations can assist second-language learners in determining whether to accept a correction suggestion and in understanding the associated grammar rule. Yuejiao Fei, Leyang Cui, Sen Yang 0005, Wai Lam, Zhen-Zhong Lan, Shuming Shi 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |