EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
JoonHo Jang
dblp:241/9686
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-8589-3832ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Generative modeling · 15% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased Dataset · ICLR 2024 Counterfactual Fairness with Disentangled Causal Effect Variational Autoencoder · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | SAAL: Sharpness-Aware Active Learning · ICML 2023 LADA: Look-Ahead Data Acquisition via Augmentation for Deep Active Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
dataset bias mitigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased Dataset · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased Dataset · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | From Noisy Prediction to True Label: Noisy Prediction Calibration via Generative Model · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | From Noisy Prediction to True Label: Noisy Prediction Calibration via Generative Model · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
negative transfer |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unknown-Aware Domain Adversarial Learning for Open-Set Domain Adaptation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
noisy label correction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | From Noisy Prediction to True Label: Noisy Prediction Calibration via Generative Model · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
open-set domain adaptation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unknown-Aware Domain Adversarial Learning for Open-Set Domain Adaptation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
prediction calibration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | From Noisy Prediction to True Label: Noisy Prediction Calibration via Generative Model · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unknown-Aware Domain Adversarial Learning for Open-Set Domain Adaptation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
transition matrix estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | From Noisy Prediction to True Label: Noisy Prediction Calibration via Generative Model · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › causal fairness
counterfactual fairness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Counterfactual Fairness with Disentangled Causal Effect Variational Autoencoder · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | LADA: Look-Ahead Data Acquisition via Augmentation for Deep Active Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
deep active learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | LADA: Look-Ahead Data Acquisition via Augmentation for Deep Active Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Counterfactual Fairness with Disentangled Causal Effect Variational Autoencoder · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bivariate Beta-LSTM · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bivariate Beta-LSTM · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | LADA: Look-Ahead Data Acquisition via Augmentation for Deep Active Learning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
time-dependent importance reweighting · 0.8score matching · 0.8sharpness-aware minimization · 0.7pseudo-labeling · 0.7transition matrix estimation · 0.6generative model · 0.6feature alignment · 0.6domain adversarial learning · 0.6fairness regularization · 0.5causal inference · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased DatasetabstractWith significant advancements in diffusion models, addressing the potential risks of dataset bias becomes increasingly important. Since generated outputs directly suffer from dataset bias, mitigating latent bias becomes a key factor in improving sample quality and proportion. This paper proposes time-dependent importance reweighting to mitigate the bias for the diffusion models. We demonstrate that the time-dependent density ratio becomes more precise than previous approaches, thereby minimizing error propagation in generative learning. While directly applying it to score-matching is intractable, we discover that using the time-dependent density ratio both for reweighting and score correction can lead to a tractable form of the objective function to regenerate the unbiased data density. Furthermore, we theoretically establish a connection with traditional score-matching, and we demonstrate its convergence to an unbiased distribution. The experimental evidence supports the usefulness of the proposed method, which outperforms baselines including time-independent importance reweighting on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, FFHQ, and CelebA with various bias settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/alsdudrla10/TIW-DSM. Yeongmin Kim, Byeonghu Na, Minsang Park, JoonHo Jang, Wanmo Kang, Il-Chul Moon |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2023 | Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification with Partial Labels and Unknown HierarchyabstractHierarchical multi-label classification aims at learning a multi-label classifier from a dataset whose labels are organized into a hierarchical structure. To the best of our knowledge, we propose for the first time the problem of finding a multi-label classifier given a partially labeled hierarchical multi-label dataset. We also assume the situation where the classifier cannot access hierarchical information during training. This work proposes an iterative framework for learning both multi-labels and a hierarchical structure of classes. When training a multi-label classifier from partial labels, our model extracts a class hierarchy from the classifier output using our hierarchy extraction algorithm. Then, our proposed loss exploits the extracted hierarchy to train the classifier. Theoretically, we show that our hierarchy extraction algorithm correctly finds the unknown hierarchy under a mild condition, and we prove that our loss function of multi-label classification with such hierarchy becomes an unbiased estimator of true multi-label classification risk. Our experiments show that our model obtains a class hierarchy close to the ground-truth dataset hierarchy, and simultaneously, our method outperforms previous methods for hierarchical multi-label classification and multi-label classification from partial labels. Suhyeon Jo, Donghyeok Shin, Byeonghu Na, JoonHo Jang, Il-Chul Moon |
CIKM | 4 |
| 2023 | SAAL: Sharpness-Aware Active LearningabstractWhile deep neural networks play significant roles in many research areas, they are also prone to overfitting problems under limited data instances. To overcome overfitting, this paper introduces the first active learning method to incorporate the sharpness of loss space into the acquisition function. Specifically, our proposed method, Sharpness-Aware Active Learning (SAAL), constructs its acquisition function by selecting unlabeled instances whose perturbed loss becomes maximum. Unlike the Sharpness-Aware learning with fully-labeled datasets, we design a pseudo-labeling mechanism to anticipate the perturbed loss w.r.t. the ground-truth label, which we provide the theoretical bound for the optimization. We conduct experiments on various benchmark datasets for vision-based tasks in image classification, object detection, and domain adaptive semantic segmentation. The experimental results confirm that SAAL outperforms the baselines by selecting instances that have the potentially maximal perturbation on the loss. The code is available at https://github.com/YoonyeongKim/SAAL. Yoon-Yeong Kim, Youngjae Cho 0002, JoonHo Jang, Byeonghu Na, Yeongmin Kim, Kyungwoo Song, Wanmo Kang, Il-Chul Moon |
ICML | 3 |
| 2022 | From Noisy Prediction to True Label: Noisy Prediction Calibration via Generative ModelabstractNoisy labels are inevitable yet problematic in machine learning society. It ruins the generalization of a classifier by making the classifier over-fitted to noisy labels. Existing methods on noisy label have focused on modifying the classifier during the training procedure. It has two potential problems. First, these methods are not applicable to a pre-trained classifier without further access to training. Second, it is not easy to train a classifier and regularize all negative effects from noisy labels, simultaneously. We suggest a new branch of method, Noisy Prediction Calibration (NPC) in learning with noisy labels. Through the introduction and estimation of a new type of transition matrix via generative model, NPC corrects the noisy prediction from the pre-trained classifier to the true label as a post-processing scheme. We prove that NPC theoretically aligns with the transition matrix based methods. Yet, NPC empirically provides more accurate pathway to estimate true label, even without involvement in classifier learning. Also, NPC is applicable to any classifier trained with noisy label methods, if training instances and its predictions are available. Our method, NPC, boosts the classification performances of all baseline models on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The implemented code is available at https://github.com/BaeHeeSun/NPC. HeeSun Bae, Byeonghu Na, JoonHo Jang, Kyungwoo Song, Il-Chul Moon |
ICML | 4 |
| 2022 | Unknown-Aware Domain Adversarial Learning for Open-Set Domain AdaptationabstractOpen-Set Domain Adaptation (OSDA) assumes that a target domain contains unknown classes, which are not discovered in a source domain. Existing domain adversarial learning methods are not suitable for OSDA because distribution matching with $\textit{unknown}$ classes leads to negative transfer. Previous OSDA methods have focused on matching the source and the target distribution by only utilizing $\textit{known}$ classes. However, this $\textit{known}$-only matching may fail to learn the target-$\textit{unknown}$ feature space. Therefore, we propose Unknown-Aware Domain Adversarial Learning (UADAL), which $\textit{aligns}$ the source and the target-$\textit{known}$ distribution while simultaneously $\textit{segregating}$ the target-$\textit{unknown}$ distribution in the feature alignment procedure. We provide theoretical analyses on the optimized state of the proposed $\textit{unknown-aware}$ feature alignment, so we can guarantee both $\textit{alignment}$ and $\textit{segregation}$ theoretically. Empirically, we evaluate UADAL on the benchmark datasets, which shows that UADAL outperforms other methods with better feature alignments by reporting state-of-the-art performances. JoonHo Jang, Byeonghu Na, Donghyeok Shin, Mingi Ji, Kyungwoo Song, Il-Chul Moon |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Counterfactual Fairness with Disentangled Causal Effect Variational AutoencoderabstractThe problem of fair classification can be mollified if we develop a method to remove the embedded sensitive information from the classification features. This line of separating the sensitive information is developed through the causal inference, and the causal inference enables the counterfactual generations to contrast the what-if case of the opposite sensitive attribute. Along with this separation with the causality, a frequent assumption in the deep latent causal model defines a single latent variable to absorb the entire exogenous uncertainty of the causal graph. However, we claim that such structure cannot distinguish the 1) information caused by the intervention (i.e., sensitive variable) and 2) information correlated with the intervention from the data. Therefore, this paper proposes Disentangled Causal Effect Variational Autoencoder (DCEVAE) to resolve this limitation by disentangling the exogenous uncertainty into two latent variables: either 1) independent to interventions or 2) correlated to interventions without causality. Particularly, our disentangling approach preserves the latent variable correlated to interventions in generating counterfactual examples. We show that our method estimates the total effect and the counterfactual effect without a complete causal graph. By adding a fairness regularization, DCEVAE generates a counterfactual fair dataset while losing less original information. Also, DCEVAE generates natural counterfactual images by only flipping sensitive information. Additionally, we theoretically show the differences in the covariance structures of DCEVAE and prior works from the perspective of the latent disentanglement. Hyemi Kim, JoonHo Jang, Kyungwoo Song, Weonyoung Joo, Wanmo Kang, Il-Chul Moon |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2021 | LADA: Look-Ahead Data Acquisition via Augmentation for Deep Active LearningabstractActive learning effectively collects data instances for training deep learning models when the labeled dataset is limited and the annotation cost is high. Data augmentation is another effective technique to enlarge the limited amount of labeled instances. The scarcity of labeled dataset leads us to consider the integration of data augmentation and active learning. One possible approach is a pipelined combination, which selects informative instances via the acquisition function and generates virtual instances from the selected instances via augmentation. However, this pipelined approach would not guarantee the informativeness of the virtual instances. This paper proposes Look-Ahead Data Acquisition via augmentation, or LADA framework, that looks ahead the effect of data augmentation in the process of acquisition. LADA jointly considers both 1) unlabeled data instance to be selected and 2) virtual data instance to be generated by data augmentation, to construct the acquisition function. Moreover, to generate maximally informative virtual instances, LADA optimizes the data augmentation policy to maximize the predictive acquisition score, resulting in the proposal of InfoSTN and InfoMixup. The experimental results of LADA show a significant improvement over the recent augmentation and acquisition baselines that were independently applied. Yoon-Yeong Kim, Kyungwoo Song, JoonHo Jang, Il-Chul Moon |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Bivariate Beta-LSTM
Kyungwoo Song, JoonHo Jang, Il-Chul Moon |
AAAI | 2 |