Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hangjian Li
dblp:241/9877
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Gaussian DAGs from Network Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Gaussian DAGs from Network Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Gaussian DAGs from Network Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
topological ordering · 0.8penalized likelihood · 0.8maximum likelihood estimation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Learning Gaussian DAGs from Network DataabstractStructural learning of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) or Bayesian networks has been studied extensively under the assumption that the data are independent. We propose a new Gaussian DAG model for dependent data which assumes the observations are correlated according to an undirected network. Under this model, we develop a method to estimate the DAG structure given a topological ordering of the nodes. The proposed method jointly estimates the Bayesian network and the correlations among observations by optimizing a scoring function based on penalized likelihood. We show that under some mild conditions, the proposed method produces consistent estimators after one iteration. Extensive numerical experiments also demonstrate that, by jointly estimating the DAG structure and the sample correlation, our method achieves much higher accuracy in structure learning. When the node ordering is unknown, through experiments on synthetic and real data, we show that our algorithm can be used to estimate the correlations between samples, with which we can de-correlate the dependent data to significantly improve the performance of classical DAG learning methods. Hangjian Li, Oscar Hernan Madrid Padilla |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |