Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Era Choshen

dblp:241/9889 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
bayes-adaptive reinforcement learning
0.712023
ContraBAR: Contrastive Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.712023
ContraBAR: Contrastive Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › temporal contrastive learning
contrastive predictive coding
0.712023
ContraBAR: Contrastive Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning
0.712023
ContraBAR: Contrastive Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational inference · 0.7contrastive predictive coding · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 ContraBAR: Contrastive Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL
abstract
In meta reinforcement learning (meta RL), an agent seeks a Bayes-optimal policy – the optimal policy when facing an unknown task that is sampled from some known task distribution. Previous approaches tackled this problem by inferring a $\textit{belief}$ over task parameters, using variational inference methods. Motivated by recent successes of contrastive learning approaches in RL, such as contrastive predictive coding (CPC), we investigate whether contrastive methods can be used for learning Bayes-optimal behavior. We begin by proving that representations learned by CPC are indeed sufficient for Bayes optimality. Based on this observation, we propose a simple meta RL algorithm that uses CPC in lieu of variational belief inference. Our method, $\textit{ContraBAR}$, achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art in domains with state-based observation and circumvents the computational toll of future observation reconstruction, enabling learning in domains with image-based observations. It can also be combined with image augmentations for domain randomization and used seamlessly in both online and offline meta RL settings.
Era Choshen, Aviv Tamar
ICML1