EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
William Tebbutt
dblp:242/3340 · also Will Tebbutt
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 87% Video understanding and tracking · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scalable Exact Inference in Multi-Output Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
multi-output gaussian process |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scalable Exact Inference in Multi-Output Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures
numerical linear algebra |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Scalable Exact Inference in Multi-Output Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
spatio-temporal modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Scalable Exact Inference in Multi-Output Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sufficient statistics · 0.9orthogonal basis · 0.9exact inference · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Combining pseudo-point and state space approximations for sum-separable Gaussian ProcessesabstractGaussian processes (GPs) are important probabilistic tools for inference and learning in spatio-temporal modelling problems such as those in climate science and epidemiology. However, existing GP approximations do not simultaneously support large numbers of off-the-grid spatial data-points and long time-series which is a hallmark of many applications. Pseudo-point approximations, one of the gold-standard methods for scaling GPs to large data sets, are well suited for handling off-the-grid spatial data. However, they cannot handle long temporal observation horizons effectively reverting to cubic computational scaling in the time dimension. State space GP approximations are well suited to handling temporal data, if the temporal GP prior admits a Markov form, leading to linear complexity in the number of temporal observations, but have a cubic spatial cost and cannot handle off-the-grid spatial data. In this work we show that there is a simple and elegant way to combine pseudo-point methods with the state space GP approximation framework to get the best of both worlds. The approach hinges on a surprising conditional independence property which applies to space–time separable GPs. We demonstrate empirically that the combined approach is more scalable and applicable to a greater range of spatio-temporal problems than either method on its own. William Tebbutt, Arno Solin, Richard E. Turner |
UAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Scalable Exact Inference in Multi-Output Gaussian ProcessesabstractMulti-output Gaussian processes (MOGPs) leverage the flexibility and interpretability of GPs while capturing structure across outputs, which is desirable, for example, in spatio-temporal modelling. The key problem with MOGPs is their computational scaling $O(n^3 p^3)$, which is cubic in the number of both inputs $n$ (e.g., time points or locations) and outputs $p$. For this reason, a popular class of MOGPs assumes that the data live around a low-dimensional linear subspace, reducing the complexity to $O(n^3 m^3)$. However, this cost is still cubic in the dimensionality of the subspace $m$, which is still prohibitively expensive for many applications. We propose the use of a sufficient statistic of the data to accelerate inference and learning in MOGPs with orthogonal bases. The method achieves linear scaling in $m$ in practice, allowing these models to scale to large $m$ without sacrificing significant expressivity or requiring approximation. This advance opens up a wide range of real-world tasks and can be combined with existing GP approximations in a plug-and-play way. We demonstrate the efficacy of the method on various synthetic and real-world data sets. Wessel P. Bruinsma, Eric Perim, William Tebbutt, J. Scott Hosking, Arno Solin, Richard E. Turner |
ICML | 3 |
| 2019 | The Gaussian Process Autoregressive Regression Model (GPAR)abstractMulti-output regression models must exploit dependencies between outputs to maximise predictive performance. The application of Gaussian processes (GPs) to this setting typically yields models that are computationally demanding and have limited representational power. We present the Gaussian Process Autoregressive Regression (GPAR) model, a scalable multi-output GP model that is able to capture nonlinear, possibly input-varying, dependencies between outputs in a simple and tractable way: the product rule is used to decompose the joint distribution over the outputs into a set of conditionals, each of which is modelled by a standard GP. GPAR’s efficacy is demonstrated on a variety of synthetic and real-world problems, outperforming existing GP models and achieving state-of-the-art performance on established benchmarks. James Requeima, William Tebbutt, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Richard E. Turner |
AISTATS | 2 |