Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ivana Malenica

dblp:242/3862 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 38% Reinforcement learning · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 29%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
semiparametric estimation
0.812024
Kernel Debiased Plug-in Estimation: Simultaneous, Automated Debiasing without Influence Functions for Many Target Parameters · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › off-policy evaluation
doubly robust estimation
0.412019
More Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation through Regularized Targeted Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation
0.412019
More Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation through Regularized Targeted Learning · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation
0.212024
Kernel Debiased Plug-in Estimation: Simultaneous, Automated Debiasing without Influence Functions for Many Target Parameters · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation
0.112019
More Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation through Regularized Targeted Learning · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.8regularized likelihood maximization · 0.8variance reduction · 0.4targeted maximum likelihood estimation · 0.4causal inference · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Kernel Debiased Plug-in Estimation: Simultaneous, Automated Debiasing without Influence Functions for Many Target Parameters
abstract
When estimating target parameters in nonparametric models with nuisance parameters, substituting the unknown nuisances with nonparametric estimators can introduce "plug-in bias." Traditional methods addressing this suboptimal bias-variance trade-off rely on the influence function (IF) of the target parameter. When estimating multiple target parameters, these methods require debiasing the nuisance parameter multiple times using the corresponding IFs, which poses analytical and computational challenges. In this work, we leverage the targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) framework to propose a novel method named kernel debiased plug-in estimation (KDPE). KDPE refines an initial estimate through regularized likelihood maximization steps, employing a nonparametric model based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. We show that KDPE: (i) simultaneously debiases all pathwise differentiable target parameters that satisfy our regularity conditions, (ii) does not require the IF for implementation, and (iii) remains computationally tractable. We numerically illustrate the use of KDPE and validate our theoretical results.
Brian Cho 0001, Yaroslav Mukhin, Kyra Gan, Ivana Malenica
ICML4
2019 More Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation through Regularized Targeted Learning
abstract
We study the problem of off-policy evaluation (OPE) in Reinforcement Learning (RL), where the aim is to estimate the performance of a new policy given historical data that may have been generated by a different policy, or policies. In particular, we introduce a novel doubly-robust estimator for the OPE problem in RL, based on the Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation principle from the statistical causal inference literature. We also introduce several variance reduction techniques that lead to impressive performance gains in off-policy evaluation. We show empirically that our estimator uniformly wins over existing off-policy evaluation methods across multiple RL environments and various levels of model misspecification. Finally, we further the existing theoretical analysis of estimators for the RL off-policy estimation problem by showing their $O_P(1/\sqrt{n})$ rate of convergence and characterizing their asymptotic distribution.
Aurélien Bibaut, Ivana Malenica, Nikos Vlassis, Mark J. van der Laan
ICML2