Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruo-Chun Tzeng

dblp:242/3884 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 80% Learning theory · 11% Graph learning · 10%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 60% Algorithms and data structures · 25% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 87% Web and social media mining · 13%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
1.832023
Best Arm Identification with Fixed Budget: A Large Deviation Perspective · NeurIPS 2023
Closing the Computational-Statistical Gap in Best Arm Identification for Combinatorial Semi-bandits · NeurIPS 2023
Fast Pure Exploration via Frank-Wolfe · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › pure exploration
best arm identification
1.832023
Best Arm Identification with Fixed Budget: A Large Deviation Perspective · NeurIPS 2023
Closing the Computational-Statistical Gap in Best Arm Identification for Combinatorial Semi-bandits · NeurIPS 2023
Fast Pure Exploration via Frank-Wolfe · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
combinatorial semi-bandits
1.422024
Matroid Semi-Bandits in Sublinear Time · ICML 2024
Closing the Computational-Statistical Gap in Best Arm Identification for Combinatorial Semi-bandits · NeurIPS 2023
Mathematical optimization
frank-wolfe algorithm
1.222023
Closing the Computational-Statistical Gap in Best Arm Identification for Combinatorial Semi-bandits · NeurIPS 2023
Fast Pure Exploration via Frank-Wolfe · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.812024
Matroid Semi-Bandits in Sublinear Time · ICML 2024
Algorithms and data structures › sublinear algorithms
sublinear-time algorithms
0.812024
Matroid Semi-Bandits in Sublinear Time · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.712023
Closing the Computational-Statistical Gap in Best Arm Identification for Combinatorial Semi-bandits · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
pure exploration
0.512021
Fast Pure Exploration via Frank-Wolfe · NeurIPS 2021
Data mining
clustering
0.412020
Discovering conflicting groups in signed networks · NeurIPS 2020
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.412020
Discovering conflicting groups in signed networks · NeurIPS 2020
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › complex networks
signed networks
0.412020
Discovering conflicting groups in signed networks · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.412019
Distributed, Egocentric Representations of Graphs for Detecting Critical Structures · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding
0.412019
Distributed, Egocentric Representations of Graphs for Detecting Critical Structures · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.212023
Closing the Computational-Statistical Gap in Best Arm Identification for Combinatorial Semi-bandits · NeurIPS 2023
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
signed social networks
0.112020
Discovering conflicting groups in signed networks · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

frank-wolfe · 2.3regret analysis · 1.5dynamic maintenance of approximate maximum-weight basis · 1.5linear maximization oracle · 1.3instance-specific lower bound · 1.0spectral methods · 0.9maximum discrete rayleigh quotient · 0.9static sampling · 0.7large deviation principle · 0.7adaptive sampling · 0.7convolutional neural network · 0.4CNN visualization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Matroid Semi-Bandits in Sublinear Time
abstract
We study the matroid semi-bandits problem, where at each round the learner plays a subset of $K$ arms from a feasible set, and the goal is to maximize the expected cumulative linear rewards. Existing algorithms have per-round time complexity at least $\Omega(K)$, which becomes expensive when $K$ is large. To address this computational issue, we propose FasterCUCB whose sampling rule takes time sublinear in $K$ for common classes of matroids: $\mathcal{O}(D\text{ polylog}(K)\text{ polylog}(T))$ for uniform matroids, partition matroids, and graphical matroids, and $\mathcal{O}(D\sqrt{K}\text{ polylog}(T))$ for transversal matroids. Here, $D$ is the maximum number of elements in any feasible subset of arms, and $T$ is the horizon. Our technique is based on dynamic maintenance of an approximate maximum-weight basis over inner-product weights. Although the introduction of an approximate maximum-weight basis presents a challenge in regret analysis, we can still guarantee an upper bound on regret as tight as CUCB in the sense that it matches the gap-dependent lower bound by Kveton et al. (2014a) asymptotically.
Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Naoto Ohsaka, Kaito Ariu
ICML1
2023 Closing the Computational-Statistical Gap in Best Arm Identification for Combinatorial Semi-bandits
abstract
We study the best arm identification problem in combinatorial semi-bandits in the fixed confidence setting. We present Perturbed Frank-Wolfe Sampling (P-FWS), an algorithm that (i) runs in polynomial time, (ii) achieves the instance-specific minimal sample complexity in the high confidence regime, and (iii) enjoys polynomial sample complexity guarantees in the moderate confidence regime. To our best knowledge, existing algorithms cannot achieve (ii) and (iii) simultaneously in vanilla bandits. With P-FWS, we close the computational-statistical gap in best arm identification in combinatorial semi-bandits. The design of P-FWS starts from the optimization problem that defines the information-theoretical and instance-specific sample complexity lower bound. P-FWS solves this problem in an online manner using, in each round, a single iteration of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm. Structural properties of the problem are leveraged to make the P-FWS successive updates computationally efficient. In turn, P-FWS only relies on a simple linear maximization oracle.
Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Po-An Wang, Alexandre Proutière, Chi-Jen Lu
NeurIPS1
2023 Best Arm Identification with Fixed Budget: A Large Deviation Perspective
abstract
We consider the problem of identifying the best arm in stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits (MABs) using a fixed sampling budget. Characterizing the minimal instance-specific error probability for this problem constitutes one of the important remaining open problems in MABs. When arms are selected using a static sampling strategy, the error probability decays exponentially with the number of samples at a rate that can be explicitly derived via Large Deviation techniques. Analyzing the performance of algorithms with adaptive sampling strategies is however much more challenging. In this paper, we establish a connection between the Large Deviation Principle (LDP) satisfied by the empirical proportions of arm draws and that satisfied by the empirical arm rewards. This connection holds for any adaptive algorithm, and is leveraged (i) to improve error probability upper bounds of some existing algorithms, such as the celebrated SR (Successive Rejects) algorithm \cite{audibert2010best}, and (ii) to devise and analyze new algorithms. In particular, we present CR (Continuous Rejects), a truly adaptive algorithm that can reject arms in {\it any} round based on the observed empirical gaps between the rewards of various arms. Applying our Large Deviation results, we prove that CR enjoys better performance guarantees than existing algorithms, including SR. Extensive numerical experiments confirm this observation.
Po-An Wang, Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Alexandre Proutière
NeurIPS2
2022 Improved analysis of randomized SVD for top-eigenvector approximation
abstract
Computing the top eigenvectors of a matrix is a problem of fundamental interest to various fields. While the majority of the literature has focused on analyzing the reconstruction error of low-rank matrices associated with the retrieved eigenvectors, in many applications one is interested in finding one vector with high Rayleigh quotient. In this paper we study the problem of approximating the top-eigenvector. Given a symmetric matrix $\mathbf{A}$ with largest eigenvalue $\lambda_1$, our goal is to find a vector $\hat{\mathbf{u}}$ that approximates the leading eigenvector $\mathbf{u}_1$ with high accuracy, as measured by the ratio $R(\hat{\mathbf{u}})=\lambda_1^{-1}{\hat{\mathbf{u}}^T\mathbf{A}\hat{\mathbf{u}}}/{\hat{\mathbf{u}}^T\hat{\mathbf{u}}}$. We present a novel analysis of the randomized SVD algorithm of \citet{halko2011finding} and derive tight bounds in many cases of interest. Notably, this is the first work that provides non-trivial bounds of $R(\hat{\mathbf{u}})$ for randomized SVD with any number of iterations. Our theoretical analysis is complemented with a thorough experimental study that confirms the efficiency and accuracy of the method.
Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Po-An Wang, Florian Adriaens, Aristides Gionis, Chi-Jen Lu
AISTATS1
2021 Fast Pure Exploration via Frank-Wolfe
abstract
We study the problem of active pure exploration with fixed confidence in generic stochastic bandit environments. The goal of the learner is to answer a query about the environment with a given level of certainty while minimizing her sampling budget. For this problem, instance-specific lower bounds on the expected sample complexity reveal the optimal proportions of arm draws an Oracle algorithm would apply. These proportions solve an optimization problem whose tractability strongly depends on the structural properties of the environment, but may be instrumental in the design of efficient learning algorithms. We devise Frank-Wolfe-based Sampling (FWS), a simple algorithm whose sample complexity matches the lower bounds for a wide class of pure exploration problems. The algorithm is computationally efficient as, to learn and track the optimal proportion of arm draws, it relies on a single iteration of Frank-Wolfe algorithm applied to the lower-bound optimization problem. We apply FWS to various pure exploration tasks, including best arm identification in unstructured, thresholded, linear, and Lipschitz bandits. Despite its simplicity, FWS is competitive compared to state-of-art algorithms.
Po-An Wang, Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Alexandre Proutière
NeurIPS2
2020 Discovering conflicting groups in signed networks
abstract
Signed networks are graphs where edges are annotated with a positive or negative sign, indicating whether an edge interaction is friendly or antagonistic. Signed networks can be used to study a variety of social phenomena, such as mining polarized discussions in social media, or modeling relations of trust and distrust in online review platforms. In this paper we study the problem of detecting $k$ conflicting groups in a signed network. Our premise is that each group is positively connected internally and negatively connected with the other $k-1$ groups. An important aspect of our formulation is that we are not searching for a complete partition of the signed network, instead, we allow other nodes to be neutral with respect to the conflict structure we are searching. As a result, the problem we tackle differs from previously studied problems, such as correlation clustering and $k$-way partitioning. To solve the conflicting-group discovery problem, we derive a novel formulation in which each conflicting group is naturally characterized by the solution to the maximum discrete Rayleigh's quotient (\maxdrq) problem. We present two spectral methods for finding approximate solutions to the \maxdrq problem, which we analyze theoretically. Our experimental evaluation shows that, compared to state-of-the-art baselines, our methods find solutions of higher quality, are faster, and recover ground truth conflicting groups with higher accuracy.
Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Bruno Ordozgoiti Rubio, Aristides Gionis
NeurIPS1
2019 Distributed, Egocentric Representations of Graphs for Detecting Critical Structures
abstract
We study the problem of detecting critical structures using a graph embedding model. Existing graph embedding models lack the ability to precisely detect critical structures that are specific to a task at the global scale. In this paper, we propose a novel graph embedding model, called the Ego-CNNs, that employs the ego-convolutions convolutions at each layer and stacks up layers using an ego-centric way to detects precise critical structures efficiently. An Ego-CNN can be jointly trained with a task model and help explain/discover knowledge for the task. We conduct extensive experiments and the results show that Ego-CNNs (1) can lead to comparable task performance as the state-of-the-art graph embedding models, (2) works nicely with CNN visualization techniques to illustrate the detected structures, and (3) is efficient and can incorporate with scale-free priors, which commonly occurs in social network datasets, to further improve the training efficiency.
Ruo-Chun Tzeng, Shan-Hung Wu
ICML1