Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Justin Alvin
dblp:242/3906
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
mutation testing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prioritizing Mutants to Guide Mutation Testing · ICSE 2022 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Prioritizing Mutants to Guide Mutation TestingabstractMutation testing offers concrete test goals (mutants) and a rigorous test efficacy criterion, but it is expensive due to vast numbers of mutants, many of which are neither useful nor actionable. Prior work has focused on selecting representative and sufficient mutant subsets, measuring whether a test set that is mutation-adequate for the subset is equally adequate for the entire set. However, no known industrial application of mutation testing uses or even computes mutation adequacy, instead focusing on iteratively presenting very few mutants as concrete test goals for developers to write tests. Samuel J. Kaufman, Ryan Featherman, Justin Alvin, Bob Kurtz, Paul Ammann, René Just |
ICSE | 3 |