Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aswathy Ajith
dblp:242/4997
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 60% Generative modeling · 20% Language models and text generation · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating Memorization in Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating Memorization in Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
memorization mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating Memorization in Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy and data protection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating Memorization in Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
training data memorization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating Memorization in Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regularization · 0.9machine unlearning · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mitigating Memorization in Language ModelsabstractLanguage models (LMs) can “memorize” information, i.e., encode training data in their weights in such a way that inference-time queries can lead to verbatim regurgitation of that data. This ability to extract training data can be problematic, for example, when data are private or sensitive. In this work, we investigate methods to mitigate memorization: three regularizer-based, three fine-tuning-based, and eleven machine unlearning-based methods, with five of the latter being new methods that we introduce. We also introduce TinyMem, a suite of small, computationally-efficient LMs for the rapid development and evaluation of memorization-mitigation methods. We demonstrate that the mitigation methods that we develop using TinyMem can successfully be applied to production-grade LMs, and we determine via experiment that: regularizer-based mitigation methods are slow and ineffective at curbing memorization; fine-tuning-based methods
are effective at curbing memorization, but overly expensive, especially for retaining higher accuracies; and unlearning-based methods are faster and more effective, allowing for the precise localization and removal of memorized information from LM weights prior to inference. We show, in particular, that our proposed unlearning method BalancedSubnet outperforms other mitigation methods at removing
memorized information while preserving performance on target tasks. Mansi Sakarvadia, Aswathy Ajith, Arham Khan, Nathaniel Hudson 0001, Caleb Geniesse, Kyle Chard, Yaoqing Yang 0002, Ian T. Foster, Michael W. Mahoney |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2019 | Active Learning Yields Better Training Data for Scientific Named Entity RecognitionabstractDespite significant progress in natural language processing, machine learning models require substantial expertannotated training data to perform well in tasks such as named entity recognition (NER) and entity relations extraction. Furthermore, NER is often more complicated when working with scientific text. For example, in polymer science, chemical structure may be encoded using nonstandard naming conventions, the same concept can be expressed using many different terms (synonymy), and authors may refer to polymers with ad-hoc labels. These challenges, which are not unique to polymer science, make it difficult to generate training data, as specialized skills are needed to label text correctly. We have previously designed polyNER, a semi-automated system for efficient identification of scientific entities in text. PolyNER applies word embedding models to generate entity-rich corpora for productive expert labeling, and then uses the resulting labeled data to bootstrap a context-based classifier. PolyNER facilitates a labeling process that is otherwise tedious and expensive. Here, we use active learning to efficiently obtain more annotations from experts and improve performance. Our approach requires just five hours of expert time to achieve discrimination capacity comparable to that of a state-of-the-art chemical NER toolkit. Roselyne Tchoua, Aswathy Ajith, Zhi Hong, Logan T. Ward, Kyle Chard, Debra Audus, Shrayesh Patel, Juan de Pablo, Ian T. Foster |
eScience | 2 |