Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Melanie B. Sigl

dblp:242/5167 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 30% Data integration and cleaning · 30% Data mining · 30%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
dataset similarity
0.412019
Don't Fear the REAPER: A Framework for Materializing and Reusing Deep-Learning Models · ICDE 2019
Data mining
model selection
0.412019
Don't Fear the REAPER: A Framework for Materializing and Reusing Deep-Learning Models · ICDE 2019
Information retrieval › search engines
dataset search
0.112019
Don't Fear the REAPER: A Framework for Materializing and Reusing Deep-Learning Models · ICDE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dataset similarity measure · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Don't Fear the REAPER: A Framework for Materializing and Reusing Deep-Learning Models
abstract
Training of Deep-Learning models represents a computationally intensive task, especially with high-dimensional and high-volume data, where training may take days or weeks. Current research mainly focuses on model materialization, workflow optimization, and lifecylce management. However, searching for a similar dataset in a dataset repository to reuse a suitable pre-built model has received little attention by the data-management community. A remarkable feature of reusing an already built model is that the iterative process of finding a suitable model is shortened, and additionally, only a small set of training data is required. Thus, transferring such knowledge has become an important issue in the Deep-Learning community. However, the relationship between the source and target task is not well understood yet. The aim of this research is to reduce training time of machine learning from a data-management perspective through model reuse, and shed some light on the above relationship in the case when reusing a model is appropriate. We propose a framework to aid data scientists in searching for a similar dataset given a new dataset and selecting a suitable model. We discuss a novel approach on how to determine similarity among datasets and how to chose an appropriate model. We are confident that with recent advances of model materialization and dataset repositories our research improves the knowledge on this topic.
Melanie B. Sigl
ICDE1