Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nikolas Nüsken

dblp:242/5262 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Generative modeling · 49% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 38% Motion planning and robot control · 9%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
1.932024
Transport meets Variational Inference: Controlled Monte Carlo Diffusions · ICLR 2024
On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization
tensor methods
1.322024
From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train format · ICML 2021
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix and tensor decomposition › tensor decomposition
tensor train decomposition
1.322024
From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train format · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.122025
Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025
Transport meets Variational Inference: Controlled Monte Carlo Diffusions · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional diffusion model
0.912025
Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion bridge
0.912025
Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › controllable generation
diffusion model control
0.912025
Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
stochastic optimal control
0.912025
Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
monte carlo diffusion
0.812024
Transport meets Variational Inference: Controlled Monte Carlo Diffusions · ICLR 2024
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
high-dimensional PDE
0.812024
From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equation solver
neural PDE solver
0.812024
From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
0.812024
From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
interacting particle systems
0.712023
On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling
0.712023
On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › particle-based variational inference
stein variational gradient descent
0.712023
On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equations
0.512021
Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train format · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation
0.412020
VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.412020
VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regression · 2.5backward stochastic differential equations · 2.5monte carlo method · 1.5tensor train decomposition · 1.0tweedie formula · 0.9score matching · 0.9malliavin calculus · 0.9score-based annealing · 0.8schroedinger bridges · 0.8optimal transport · 0.8reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.7mean-field limit · 0.7gradient flow · 0.7control variates · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus
abstract
In generative modelling and stochastic optimal control, a central computational task is to modify a reference diffusion process to maximise a given terminal-time reward. Most existing methods require this reward to be differentiable, using gradients to steer the diffusion towards favourable outcomes. However, in many practical settings, like diffusion bridges, the reward is singular, taking an infinite value if the target is hit and zero otherwise. We introduce a novel framework, based on Malliavin calculus and centred around a generalisation of the Tweedie score formula to nonlinear stochastic differential equations, that enables the development of methods robust to such singularities. This allows our approach to handle a broad range of applications, like diffusion bridges, or adding conditional controls to an already trained diffusion model. We demonstrate that our approach offers stable and reliable training, outperforming existing techniques. As a byproduct, we also introduce a novel score matching objective. Our loss functions are formulated such that they could readily be extended to manifold-valued and infinite dimensional diffusions.
Jakiw Pidstrigach, Elizabeth Louise Baker, Carles Domingo-Enrich, George Deligiannidis, Nikolas Nüsken
ICML5
2024 Transport meets Variational Inference: Controlled Monte Carlo Diffusions
abstract
Connecting optimal transport and variational inference, we present a principled and systematic framework for sampling and generative modelling centred around divergences on path space. Our work culminates in the development of the Controlled Monte Carlo Diffusion sampler (CMCD) for Bayesian computation, a score-based annealing technique that crucially adapts both forward and backward dynamics in a diffusion model. On the way, we clarify the relationship between the EM-algorithm and iterative proportional fitting (IPF) for Schroedinger bridges, deriving as well a regularised objective that bypasses the iterative bottleneck of standard IPF-updates. Finally, we show that CMCD has a strong foundation in the Jarzinsky and Crooks identities from statistical physics, and that it convincingly outperforms competing approaches across a wide array of experiments.
Francisco Vargas 0001, Shreyas Padhy, Denis Blessing, Nikolas Nüsken
ICLR4
2024 From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs
abstract
The numerical approximation of partial differential equations (PDEs) poses formidable challenges in high dimensions since classical grid-based methods suffer from the so-called curse of dimensionality. Recent attempts rely on a combination of Monte Carlo methods and variational formulations, using neural networks for function approximation. Extending previous work (Richter et al., 2021), we argue that tensor trains provide an appealing framework for parabolic PDEs: The combination of reformulations in terms of backward stochastic differential equations and regression-type methods holds the promise of leveraging latent low-rank structures, enabling both compression and efficient computation. Emphasizing a continuous-time viewpoint, we develop iterative schemes, which differ in terms of computational efficiency and robustness. We demonstrate both theoretically and numerically that our methods can achieve a favorable trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency. While previous methods have been either accurate or fast, we have identified a novel numerical strategy that can often combine both of these aspects.
Lorenz Richter, Leon Sallandt, Nikolas Nüsken
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2023 On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descent
abstract
Bayesian inference problems require sampling or approximating high-dimensional probability distributions. The focus of this paper is on the recently introduced Stein variational gradient descent methodology, a class of algorithms that rely on iterated steepest descent steps with respect to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space norm. This construction leads to interacting particle systems, the mean field limit of which is a gradient flow on the space of probability distributions equipped with a certain geometrical structure. We leverage this viewpoint to shed some light on the convergence properties of the algorithm, in particular addressing the problem of choosing a suitable positive definite kernel function. Our analysis leads us to considering certain nondifferentiable kernels with adjusted tails. We demonstrate significant performance gains of these in various numerical experiments.
Andrew B. Duncan, Nikolas Nüsken, Lukasz Szpruch
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2021 Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train format
abstract
High-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) are ubiquitous in economics, science and engineering. However, their numerical treatment poses formidable challenges since traditional grid-based methods tend to be frustrated by the curse of dimensionality. In this paper, we argue that tensor trains provide an appealing approximation framework for parabolic PDEs: the combination of reformulations in terms of backward stochastic differential equations and regression-type methods in the tensor format holds the promise of leveraging latent low-rank structures enabling both compression and efficient computation. Following this paradigm, we develop novel iterative schemes, involving either explicit and fast or implicit and accurate updates. We demonstrate in a number of examples that our methods achieve a favorable trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency in comparison with state-of-the-art neural network based approaches.
Lorenz Richter, Leon Sallandt, Nikolas Nüsken
ICML3
2020 VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational Inference
abstract
We analyse the properties of an unbiased gradient estimator of the ELBO for variational inference, based on the score function method with leave-one-out control variates. We show that this gradient estimator can be obtained using a new loss, defined as the variance of the log-ratio between the exact posterior and the variational approximation, which we call the log-variance loss. Under certain conditions, the gradient of the log-variance loss equals the gradient of the (negative) ELBO. We show theoretically that this gradient estimator, which we call VarGrad due to its connection to the log-variance loss, exhibits lower variance than the score function method in certain settings, and that the leave-one-out control variate coefficients are close to the optimal ones. We empirically demonstrate that VarGrad offers a favourable variance versus computation trade-off compared to other state-of-the-art estimators on a discrete VAE.
Lorenz Richter, Ayman Boustati, Nikolas Nüsken, Francisco J. R. Ruiz, Ömer Deniz Akyildiz
NeurIPS3