Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nikolas Nüsken
dblp:242/5262
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Generative modeling · 49% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 38% Motion planning and robot control · 9% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | Transport meets Variational Inference: Controlled Monte Carlo Diffusions · ICLR 2024 On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
tensor methods |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train format · ICML 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix and tensor decomposition › tensor decomposition
tensor train decomposition |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train format · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025 Transport meets Variational Inference: Controlled Monte Carlo Diffusions · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion bridge |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › controllable generation
diffusion model control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
stochastic optimal control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin Calculus · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
monte carlo diffusion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Transport meets Variational Inference: Controlled Monte Carlo Diffusions · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
high-dimensional PDE |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equation solver
neural PDE solver |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
interacting particle systems |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › particle-based variational inference
stein variational gradient descent |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descent · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equations |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train format · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regression · 2.5backward stochastic differential equations · 2.5monte carlo method · 1.5tensor train decomposition · 1.0tweedie formula · 0.9score matching · 0.9malliavin calculus · 0.9score-based annealing · 0.8schroedinger bridges · 0.8optimal transport · 0.8reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.7mean-field limit · 0.7gradient flow · 0.7control variates · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Conditioning Diffusions Using Malliavin CalculusabstractIn generative modelling and stochastic optimal control, a central computational task is to modify a reference diffusion process to maximise a given terminal-time reward.
Most existing methods require this reward to be differentiable, using gradients to steer the diffusion towards favourable outcomes.
However, in many practical settings, like diffusion bridges, the reward is singular, taking an infinite value if the target is hit and zero otherwise.
We introduce a novel framework, based on Malliavin calculus and centred around a generalisation of the Tweedie score formula to nonlinear stochastic differential equations, that enables the development of methods robust to such singularities.
This allows our approach to handle a broad range of applications, like diffusion bridges, or adding conditional controls to an already trained diffusion model.
We demonstrate that our approach offers stable and reliable training, outperforming existing techniques.
As a byproduct, we also introduce a novel score matching objective. Our loss functions are formulated such that they could readily be extended to manifold-valued and infinite dimensional diffusions. Jakiw Pidstrigach, Elizabeth Louise Baker, Carles Domingo-Enrich, George Deligiannidis, Nikolas Nüsken |
ICML | 5 |
| 2024 | Transport meets Variational Inference: Controlled Monte Carlo DiffusionsabstractConnecting optimal transport and variational inference, we present a principled and systematic framework for sampling and generative modelling centred around divergences on path space. Our work culminates in the development of the Controlled Monte Carlo Diffusion sampler (CMCD) for Bayesian computation, a score-based annealing technique that crucially adapts both forward and backward dynamics in a diffusion model. On the way, we clarify the relationship between the EM-algorithm and iterative proportional fitting (IPF) for Schroedinger bridges, deriving as well a regularised objective that bypasses the iterative bottleneck of standard IPF-updates. Finally, we show that CMCD has a strong foundation in the Jarzinsky and Crooks identities from statistical physics, and that it convincingly outperforms competing approaches across a wide array of experiments. Francisco Vargas 0001, Shreyas Padhy, Denis Blessing, Nikolas Nüsken |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2024 | From continuous-time formulations to discretization schemes: tensor trains and robust regression for BSDEs and parabolic PDEsabstractThe numerical approximation of partial differential equations (PDEs) poses formidable challenges in high dimensions since classical grid-based methods suffer from the so-called curse of dimensionality. Recent attempts rely on a combination of Monte Carlo methods and variational formulations, using neural networks for function approximation. Extending previous work (Richter et al., 2021), we argue that tensor trains provide an appealing framework for parabolic PDEs: The combination of reformulations in terms of backward stochastic differential equations and regression-type methods holds the promise of leveraging latent low-rank structures, enabling both compression and efficient computation. Emphasizing a continuous-time viewpoint, we develop iterative schemes, which differ in terms of computational efficiency and robustness. We demonstrate both theoretically and numerically that our methods can achieve a favorable trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency. While previous methods have been either accurate or fast, we have identified a novel numerical strategy that can often combine both of these aspects. Lorenz Richter, Leon Sallandt, Nikolas Nüsken |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2023 | On the geometry of Stein variational gradient descentabstractBayesian inference problems require sampling or approximating high-dimensional probability distributions. The focus of this paper is on the recently introduced Stein variational gradient descent methodology, a class of algorithms that rely on iterated steepest descent steps with respect to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space norm. This construction leads to interacting particle systems, the mean field limit of which is a gradient flow on the space of probability distributions equipped with a certain geometrical structure. We leverage this viewpoint to shed some light on the convergence properties of the algorithm, in particular addressing the problem of choosing a suitable positive definite kernel function. Our analysis leads us to considering certain nondifferentiable kernels with adjusted tails. We demonstrate significant performance gains of these in various numerical experiments. Andrew B. Duncan, Nikolas Nüsken, Lukasz Szpruch |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2021 | Solving high-dimensional parabolic PDEs using the tensor train formatabstractHigh-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) are ubiquitous in economics, science and engineering. However, their numerical treatment poses formidable challenges since traditional grid-based methods tend to be frustrated by the curse of dimensionality. In this paper, we argue that tensor trains provide an appealing approximation framework for parabolic PDEs: the combination of reformulations in terms of backward stochastic differential equations and regression-type methods in the tensor format holds the promise of leveraging latent low-rank structures enabling both compression and efficient computation. Following this paradigm, we develop novel iterative schemes, involving either explicit and fast or implicit and accurate updates. We demonstrate in a number of examples that our methods achieve a favorable trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency in comparison with state-of-the-art neural network based approaches. Lorenz Richter, Leon Sallandt, Nikolas Nüsken |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | VarGrad: A Low-Variance Gradient Estimator for Variational InferenceabstractWe analyse the properties of an unbiased gradient estimator of the ELBO for variational inference, based on the score function method with leave-one-out control variates. We show that this gradient estimator can be obtained using a new loss, defined as the variance of the log-ratio between the exact posterior and the variational approximation, which we call the log-variance loss. Under certain conditions, the gradient of the log-variance loss equals the gradient of the (negative) ELBO. We show theoretically that this gradient estimator, which we call VarGrad due to its connection to the log-variance loss, exhibits lower variance than the score function method in certain settings, and that the leave-one-out control variate coefficients are close to the optimal ones. We empirically demonstrate that VarGrad offers a favourable variance versus computation trade-off compared to other state-of-the-art estimators on a discrete VAE. Lorenz Richter, Ayman Boustati, Nikolas Nüsken, Francisco J. R. Ruiz, Ömer Deniz Akyildiz |
NeurIPS | 3 |