Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anton Mroczkowski

dblp:242/5354 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5349-9357ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 67% Distributed systems · 33%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
clock synchronization
0.412019
Performance and Reliability Aspects of Clock Synchronization Techniques for Industrial Automation · Proc. IEEE 2019
Embedded and real-time systems › cyber-physical system platforms
industrial automation
0.412019
Performance and Reliability Aspects of Clock Synchronization Techniques for Industrial Automation · Proc. IEEE 2019
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time communication › real-time networks
time-sensitive networking
0.412019
Performance and Reliability Aspects of Clock Synchronization Techniques for Industrial Automation · Proc. IEEE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

packet-based time transfer · 0.8IEEE 802.1AS · 0.8IEEE 1588 · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Performance and Reliability Aspects of Clock Synchronization Techniques for Industrial Automation
abstract
Modern distributed control systems comprise multiple intelligent devices capable of performing complex time and mission-critical tasks both independently of each other or partly jointly with each other. To do so, they strongly depend on an accurate common notion of time as well as a reliable shared communication medium for timely data exchange. Traditional legacy communication technologies (field bus systems) supported time transport to a certain extent or provided at least a common frequency. Due to its numerous undisputed advantages, Ethernet has become the only viable communication medium effectively replacing such systems. Being inherently asynchronous time and frequency transfer has to be accomplished using a packet-based approach when moving to Ethernet. After explaining the basic principles of packet-based time transfer, the most common standards are explained compared with each other with respect to their intended application domains. Special emphasis will be put on the Precision Time Protocol (PTP) as defined in the underlying IEEE 1588 standard and its variant IEEE 802.1AS used for time-sensitive networks. Maintaining a highly accurate common notion of time under all circumstances is a crucial prerequisite for most distributed systems. Although PTP has proven to provide sub-microsecond accuracies, it can cope only with a limited number of error conditions. This paper describes all major sources that can either deteriorate the accuracy or cause a total loss of synchronization altogether. Selected countermeasures and enhancements are presented, which can greatly improve the resilience of PTP against errors as well as malicious attacks. This paper concludes by presenting the selected measurements' results of a novel proposed method.
Nikolaus Kerö, Andreas Puhm, Thomas Kernen, Anton Mroczkowski
Proc. IEEE4