Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anton Mroczkowski
dblp:242/5354
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5349-9357ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 67% Distributed systems · 33% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
clock synchronization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Performance and Reliability Aspects of Clock Synchronization Techniques for Industrial Automation · Proc. IEEE 2019 |
Embedded and real-time systems › cyber-physical system platforms
industrial automation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Performance and Reliability Aspects of Clock Synchronization Techniques for Industrial Automation · Proc. IEEE 2019 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time communication › real-time networks
time-sensitive networking |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Performance and Reliability Aspects of Clock Synchronization Techniques for Industrial Automation · Proc. IEEE 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
packet-based time transfer · 0.8IEEE 802.1AS · 0.8IEEE 1588 · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Performance and Reliability Aspects of Clock Synchronization Techniques for Industrial AutomationabstractModern distributed control systems comprise multiple intelligent devices capable of performing complex time and mission-critical tasks both independently of each other or partly jointly with each other. To do so, they strongly depend on an accurate common notion of time as well as a reliable shared communication medium for timely data exchange. Traditional legacy communication technologies (field bus systems) supported time transport to a certain extent or provided at least a common frequency. Due to its numerous undisputed advantages, Ethernet has become the only viable communication medium effectively replacing such systems. Being inherently asynchronous time and frequency transfer has to be accomplished using a packet-based approach when moving to Ethernet. After explaining the basic principles of packet-based time transfer, the most common standards are explained compared with each other with respect to their intended application domains. Special emphasis will be put on the Precision Time Protocol (PTP) as defined in the underlying IEEE 1588 standard and its variant IEEE 802.1AS used for time-sensitive networks. Maintaining a highly accurate common notion of time under all circumstances is a crucial prerequisite for most distributed systems. Although PTP has proven to provide sub-microsecond accuracies, it can cope only with a limited number of error conditions. This paper describes all major sources that can either deteriorate the accuracy or cause a total loss of synchronization altogether. Selected countermeasures and enhancements are presented, which can greatly improve the resilience of PTP against errors as well as malicious attacks. This paper concludes by presenting the selected measurements' results of a novel proposed method. Nikolaus Kerö, Andreas Puhm, Thomas Kernen, Anton Mroczkowski |
Proc. IEEE | 4 |