EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tesi Xiao
dblp:242/7909
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-6519-493XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 60% Optimization for machine learning · 21% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
bilevel optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Algorithms for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization under Relaxed Smoothness Conditions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
entropic optimal transport |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerating Sinkhorn algorithm with sparse Newton iterations · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
newton-type methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerating Sinkhorn algorithm with sparse Newton iterations · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerating Sinkhorn algorithm with sparse Newton iterations · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport › entropic optimal transport
sinkhorn algorithm |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Accelerating Sinkhorn algorithm with sparse Newton iterations · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › bilevel optimization
stochastic bilevel optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Algorithms for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization under Relaxed Smoothness Conditions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Projection-free Algorithm for Constrained Stochastic Multi-level Composition Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › compositional optimization
stochastic compositional optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Projection-free Algorithm for Constrained Stochastic Multi-level Composition Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Projection-free Algorithm for Constrained Stochastic Multi-level Composition Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural differential equations |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | How Does Noise Help Robustness? Explanation and Exploration under the Neural SDE Framework · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural stochastic differential equations |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | How Does Noise Help Robustness? Explanation and Exploration under the Neural SDE Framework · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
noise-based regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | How Does Noise Help Robustness? Explanation and Exploration under the Neural SDE Framework · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | How Does Noise Help Robustness? Explanation and Exploration under the Neural SDE Framework · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Algorithms for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization under Relaxed Smoothness Conditions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Algorithms for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization under Relaxed Smoothness Conditions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
single-loop algorithm · 1.5neumann series · 1.5hessian-inversion-free · 1.5newton method · 0.8hessian sparsification · 0.8stochastic first-order oracle · 0.6linear minimization oracle · 0.6conditional gradient · 0.6stochastic differential equation · 0.4gaussian noise · 0.4dropout · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Orbit: A Framework for Designing and Evaluating Multi-objective Rankers
Chenyang Yang 0002, Tesi Xiao, Michael Shavlovsky, Christian Kästner, Sherry Tongshuang Wu |
IUI | 2 |
| 2025 | COS-DPO: Conditioned One-Shot Multi-Objective Fine-Tuning FrameworkabstractIn LLM alignment and many other ML applications, one often faces the *Multi-Objective Fine-Tuning* (MOFT) problem, *i.e.*, fine-tuning an existing model with datasets labeled w.r.t. different objectives simultaneously. To address the challenge, we propose a *Conditioned One-Shot* fine-tuning framework (COS-DPO) that extends the Direct Preference Optimization technique, originally developed for efficient LLM alignment with preference data, to accommodate the MOFT settings. By direct conditioning on the weight across auxiliary objectives, our Weight-COS-DPO method enjoys an efficient one-shot training process for profiling the Pareto front and is capable of achieving comprehensive trade-off solutions even in the post-training stage. Based on our theoretical findings on the linear transformation properties of the loss function, we further propose the Temperature-COS-DPO method that augments the temperature parameter to the model input, enhancing the flexibility of post-training control over the trade-offs between the main and auxiliary objectives. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the COS-DPO framework through its applications to various tasks, including the Learning-to-Rank (LTR) and LLM alignment tasks, highlighting its viability for large-scale ML deployments. Yinuo Ren, Tesi Xiao, Michael Shavlovsky, Lexing Ying, Holakou Rahmanian |
UAI | 2 |
| 2024 | Multi-objective Optimization via Wasserstein-Fisher-Rao Gradient FlowabstractMulti-objective optimization (MOO) aims to optimize multiple, possibly conflicting objectives with widespread applications. We introduce a novel interacting particle method for MOO inspired by molecular dynamics simulations. Our approach combines overdamped Langevin and birth-death dynamics, incorporating a “dominance potential” to steer particles toward global Pareto optimality. In contrast to previous methods, our method is able to relocate dominated particles, making it particularly adept at managing Pareto fronts of complicated geometries. Our method is also theoretically grounded as a Wasserstein-Fisher-Rao gradient flow with convergence guarantees. Extensive experiments confirm that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods on challenging synthetic and real-world datasets. Yinuo Ren, Tesi Xiao, Tanmay Gangwani, Anshuka Rangi, Holakou Rahmanian, Lexing Ying, Subhajit Sanyal |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2024 | Accelerating Sinkhorn algorithm with sparse Newton iterationsabstractComputing the optimal transport distance between statistical distributions is a fundamental task in machine learning. One remarkable recent advancement is entropic regularization and the Sinkhorn algorithm, which utilizes only matrix scaling and guarantees an approximated solution with near-linear runtime. Despite the success of the Sinkhorn algorithm, its runtime may still be slow due to the potentially large number of iterations needed for convergence. To achieve possibly super-exponential convergence, we introduce Sinkhorn-Newton-Sparse (SNS), an extension to the Sinkhorn algorithm, by introducing early stopping for the matrix scaling steps and a second stage featuring a Newton-type subroutine. Adopting the variational viewpoint that the Sinkhorn algorithm maximizes a concave Lyapunov potential, we offer the insight that the Hessian matrix of the potential function is approximately sparse. Sparsification of the Hessian results in a fast $O(n^2)$ per-iteration complexity, the same as the Sinkhorn algorithm. In terms of total iteration count, we observe that the SNS algorithm converges orders of magnitude faster across a wide range of practical cases, including optimal transportation between empirical distributions and calculating the Wasserstein $W_1, W_2$ distance of discretized continuous densities. The empirical performance is corroborated by a rigorous bound on the approximate sparsity of the Hessian matrix. Michael Shavlovsky, Holakou Rahmanian, Elisa Tardini, Kiran Koshy Thekumparampil, Tesi Xiao, Lexing Ying |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2024 | Optimal Algorithms for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization under Relaxed Smoothness ConditionsabstractWe consider stochastic bilevel optimization problems involving minimizing an upper-level ($\texttt{UL}$) function that is dependent on the arg-min of a strongly-convex lower-level ($\texttt{LL}$) function. Several algorithms utilize Neumann series to approximate certain matrix inverses involved in estimating the implicit gradient of the $\texttt{UL}$ function (hypergradient). The state-of-the-art StOchastic Bilevel Algorithm ($\texttt{SOBA}$) instead uses stochastic gradient descent steps to solve the linear system associated with the explicit matrix inversion. This modification enables $\texttt{SOBA}$ to obtain a sample complexity of $\mathcal{O}(1/\epsilon^{2})$ for finding an $\epsilon$-stationary point. Unfortunately, the current analysis of $\texttt{SOBA}$ relies on the assumption of higher-order smoothness for the $\texttt{UL}$ and $\texttt{LL}$ functions to achieve optimality. In this paper, we introduce a novel fully single-loop and Hessian-inversion-free algorithmic framework for stochastic bilevel optimization and present a tighter analysis under standard smoothness assumptions (first-order Lipschitzness of the $\texttt{UL}$ function and second-order Lipschitzness of the $\texttt{LL}$ function). Furthermore, we show that a slight modification of our algorithm can handle a more general multi-objective robust bilevel optimization problem. For this case, we obtain the state-of-the-art oracle complexity results demonstrating the generality of both the proposed algorithmic and analytic frameworks. Numerical experiments demonstrate the performance gain of the proposed algorithms over existing ones. Xuxing Chen, Tesi Xiao, Krishnakumar Balasubramanian 0002 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | A one-sample decentralized proximal algorithm for non-convex stochastic composite optimizationabstractWe focus on decentralized stochastic non-convex optimization, where $n$ agents work together to optimize a composite objective function which is a sum of a smooth term and a non-smooth convex term. To solve this problem, we propose two single-time scale algorithms: \texttt{Prox-DASA} and \texttt{Prox-DASA-GT}. These algorithms can find $\epsilon$-stationary points in $\mathcal{O}(n^{-1}\epsilon^{-2})$ iterations using constant batch sizes (i.e., $\mathcal{O}(1)$). Unlike prior work, our algorithms achieve comparable complexity without requiring large batch sizes, more complex per-iteration operations (such as double loops), or stronger assumptions. Our theoretical findings are supported by extensive numerical experiments, which demonstrate the superiority of our algorithms over previous approaches. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/xuxingc/ProxDASA}. Tesi Xiao, Xuxing Chen, Krishnakumar Balasubramanian 0002, Saeed Ghadimi |
UAI | 1 |
| 2022 | A Projection-free Algorithm for Constrained Stochastic Multi-level Composition OptimizationabstractWe propose a projection-free conditional gradient-type algorithm for smooth stochastic multi-level composition optimization, where the objective function is a nested composition of $T$ functions and the constraint set is a closed convex set. Our algorithm assumes access to noisy evaluations of the functions and their gradients, through a stochastic first-order oracle satisfying certain standard unbiasedness and second-moment assumptions. We show that the number of calls to the stochastic first-order oracle and the linear-minimization oracle required by the proposed algorithm, to obtain an $\epsilon$-stationary solution, are of order $\mathcal{O}_T(\epsilon^{-2})$ and $\mathcal{O}_T(\epsilon^{-3})$ respectively, where $\mathcal{O}_T$ hides constants in $T$. Notably, the dependence of these complexity bounds on $\epsilon$ and $T$ are separate in the sense that changing one does not impact the dependence of the bounds on the other. For the case of $T=1$, we also provide a high-probability convergence result that depends poly-logarithmically on the inverse confidence level. Moreover, our algorithm is parameter-free and does not require any (increasing) order of mini-batches to converge unlike the common practice in the analysis of stochastic conditional gradient-type algorithms. Tesi Xiao, Krishnakumar Balasubramanian 0002, Saeed Ghadimi |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | How Does Noise Help Robustness? Explanation and Exploration under the Neural SDE FrameworkabstractNeural Ordinary Differential Equation (Neural ODE) has been proposed as a continuous approximation to the ResNet architecture. Some commonly used regularization mechanisms in discrete neural networks (e.g., dropout, Gaussian noise) are missing in current Neural ODE networks. In this paper, we propose a new continuous neural network framework called Neural Stochastic Differential Equation (Neural SDE), which naturally incorporates various commonly used regularization mechanisms based on random noise injection. For regularization purposes, our framework includes multiple types of noise patterns, such as dropout, additive, and multiplicative noise, which are common in plain neural networks. We provide some theoretical analyses explaining the improved robustness of our models against input perturbations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the Neural SDE network can achieve better generalization than the Neural ODE and is more resistant to adversarial and non-adversarial input perturbations. Xuanqing Liu, Tesi Xiao, Si Si, Qin Cao, Sanjiv Kumar, Cho-Jui Hsieh |
CVPR | 2 |