Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kazuki Shitara
dblp:242/7924
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Sequential and Parallel Constrained Max-value Entropy Search via Information Lower Bound · ICML 2022 Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization using Pareto-frontier Entropy · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
entropy search |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Sequential and Parallel Constrained Max-value Entropy Search via Information Lower Bound · ICML 2022 Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization using Pareto-frontier Entropy · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
constrained bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sequential and Parallel Constrained Max-value Entropy Search via Information Lower Bound · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization using Pareto-frontier Entropy · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
multi-objective bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization using Pareto-frontier Entropy · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mutual information lower bound · 0.6monte carlo estimator · 0.6pareto-frontier entropy · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Sequential and Parallel Constrained Max-value Entropy Search via Information Lower BoundabstractMax-value entropy search (MES) is one of the state-of-the-art approaches in Bayesian optimization (BO). In this paper, we propose a novel variant of MES for constrained problems, called Constrained MES via Information lower BOund (CMES-IBO), that is based on a Monte Carlo (MC) estimator of a lower bound of a mutual information (MI). Unlike existing studies, our MI is defined so that uncertainty with respect to feasibility can be incorporated. We derive a lower bound of the MI that guarantees non-negativity, while a constrained counterpart of conventional MES can be negative. We further provide theoretical analysis that assures the low-variability of our estimator which has never been investigated for any existing information-theoretic BO. Moreover, using the conditional MI, we extend CMES-IBO to the parallel setting while maintaining the desirable properties. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CMES-IBO by several benchmark functions and real-world problems. Shion Takeno, Tomoyuki Tamura, Kazuki Shitara, Masayuki Karasuyama |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization using Pareto-frontier EntropyabstractThis paper studies an entropy-based multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MBO). Existing entropy-based MBO methods need complicated approximations to evaluate entropy or employ over-simplification that ignores trade-off among objectives. We propose a novel entropy-based MBO called Pareto-frontier entropy search (PFES), which is based on the information gain of Pareto-frontier. We show that our entropy evaluation can be reduced to a closed form whose computation is quite simple while capturing the trade-off relation in Pareto-frontier. We further propose an extension for the “decoupled” setting, in which each objective function can be observed separately, and show that the PFES-based approach derives a natural extension of the original acquisition function which can also be evaluated simply. Our numerical experiments show effectiveness of PFES through several benchmark datasets, and real-word datasets from materials science. Shinya Suzuki, Shion Takeno, Tomoyuki Tamura, Kazuki Shitara, Masayuki Karasuyama |
ICML | 4 |