Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Herilalaina Rakotoarison

dblp:242/7961 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5267-7521ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 51% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28% Efficient and distributed learning · 13%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
1.832024
In-Context Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization · ICML 2024
Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Automated Machine Learning with Monte-Carlo Tree Search · IJCAI 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
1.122024
In-Context Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization · ICML 2024
Automated Machine Learning with Monte-Carlo Tree Search · IJCAI 2019
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
automated machine learning
1.022022
Learning meta-features for AutoML · ICLR 2022
Automated Machine Learning with Monte-Carlo Tree Search · IJCAI 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference
0.712023
Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.712023
Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning curve extrapolation
0.712023
Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
prior-data fitted networks
0.712023
Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
early stopping
0.212023
Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.212023
Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.212022
Learning meta-features for AutoML · ICLR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.4prior-data fitted networks · 1.4in-context learning · 0.8acquisition function · 0.8MCMC · 0.7meta-learning · 0.6monte carlo tree search · 0.4ensembling · 0.4bayesian optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 In-Context Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization
abstract
With the increasing computational costs associated with deep learning, automated hyperparameter optimization methods, strongly relying on black-box Bayesian optimization (BO), face limitations. Freeze-thaw BO offers a promising grey-box alternative, strategically allocating scarce resources incrementally to different configurations. However, the frequent surrogate model updates inherent to this approach pose challenges for existing methods, requiring retraining or fine-tuning their neural network surrogates online, introducing overhead, instability, and hyper-hyperparameters. In this work, we propose FT-PFN, a novel surrogate for Freeze-thaw style BO. FT-PFN is a prior-data fitted network (PFN) that leverages the transformers' in-context learning ability to efficiently and reliably do Bayesian learning curve extrapolation in a single forward pass. Our empirical analysis across three benchmark suites shows that the predictions made by FT-PFN are more accurate and 10-100 times faster than those of the deep Gaussian process and deep ensemble surrogates used in previous work. Furthermore, we show that, when combined with our novel acquisition mechanism (MFPI-random), the resulting in-context freeze-thaw BO method (ifBO), yields new state-of-the-art performance in the same three families of deep learning HPO benchmarks considered in prior work.
Herilalaina Rakotoarison, Steven Adriaensen, Neeratyoy Mallik, Samir Garibov, Eddie Bergman, Frank Hutter
ICML1
2023 Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networks
abstract
Learning curve extrapolation aims to predict model performance in later epochs of training, based on the performance in earlier epochs. In this work, we argue that, while the inherent uncertainty in the extrapolation of learning curves warrants a Bayesian approach, existing methods are (i) overly restrictive, and/or (ii) computationally expensive. We describe the first application of prior-data fitted neural networks (PFNs) in this context. A PFN is a transformer, pre-trained on data generated from a prior, to perform approximate Bayesian inference in a single forward pass. We propose LC-PFN, a PFN trained to extrapolate 10 million artificial right-censored learning curves generated from a parametric prior proposed in prior art using MCMC. We demonstrate that LC-PFN can approximate the posterior predictive distribution more accurately than MCMC, while being over 10 000 times faster. We also show that the same LC-PFN achieves competitive performance extrapolating a total of 20 000 real learning curves from four learning curve benchmarks (LCBench, NAS-Bench-201, Taskset, and PD1) that stem from training a wide range of model architectures (MLPs, CNNs, RNNs, and Transformers) on 53 different datasets with varying input modalities (tabular, image, text, and protein data). Finally, we investigate its potential in the context of model selection and find that a simple LC-PFN based predictive early stopping criterion obtains 2 - 6x speed-ups on 45 of these datasets, at virtually no overhead.
Steven Adriaensen, Herilalaina Rakotoarison, Samuel Müller 0005, Frank Hutter
NeurIPS2
2022 Learning meta-features for AutoML
Herilalaina Rakotoarison, Louisot Milijaona, Andry Rasoanaivo, Michèle Sebag, Marc Schoenauer
ICLR1
2022 Black-Box Optimization Revisited: Improving Algorithm Selection Wizards Through Massive Benchmarking
abstract
Existing studies in black-box optimization suffer from low generalizability, caused by a typically selective choice of problem instances used for training and testing of different optimization algorithms. Among other issues, this practice promotes overfitting and poor-performing user guidelines. We address this shortcoming by introducing in this work a general-purpose algorithm selection wizard that was designed and tested on a previously unseen breadth of black-box optimization problems, ranging from academic benchmarks to real-world applications, from discrete over numerical to mixed-integer problems, from small to very large-scale problems, from noisy over dynamic to static problems, etc. Not only did we use the already very extensive benchmark environment available in Nevergrad, but we also extended it significantly by adding a number of additional benchmark suites, including Pyomo, Photonics, large-scale global optimization (LSGO), and MuJoCo. Our wizard achieves competitive performance on all benchmark suites. It significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art algorithms on some of the suites, including YABBOB and LSGO. Its excellent performance is obtained without any task-specific parametrization. The algorithm selection wizard, all of its base solvers, as well as the benchmark suites are available for reproducible research in the open-source Nevergrad platform.
Laurent Meunier, Herilalaina Rakotoarison, Pak-Kan Wong, Baptiste Rozière, Jérémy Rapin, Olivier Teytaud, Antoine Moreau, Carola Doerr
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.2
2019 Automated Machine Learning with Monte-Carlo Tree Search
abstract
The AutoML approach aims to deliver peak performance from a machine learning portfolio on the dataset at hand. A Monte-Carlo Tree Search Algorithm Selection and Configuration (Mosaic) approach is presented to tackle this mixed (combinatorial and continuous) expensive optimization problem on the structured search space of ML pipelines. Extensive lesion studies are conducted to independently assess and compare: i) the optimization processes based on Bayesian Optimization or Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS); ii) its warm-start initialization based on meta-features or random runs; iii) the ensembling of the solutions gathered along the search. Mosaic is assessed on the OpenML 100 benchmark and the Scikit-learn portfolio, with statistically significant gains over AutoSkLearn, winner of all former AutoML challenges.
Herilalaina Rakotoarison, Marc Schoenauer, Michèle Sebag
IJCAI1