Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jingong Huang

dblp:242/9172 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 80% Computational science and engineering · 20%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.912025
SHICEDO: single-cell Hi-C data enhancement with reduced over-smoothing · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell genomics
single-cell hi-c data analysis
0.912025
SHICEDO: single-cell Hi-C data enhancement with reduced over-smoothing · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics
biomedical network analysis
0.412020
Graph embedding on biomedical networks: methods, applications and evaluations · Bioinform. 2020
Computational science and engineering › graph learning
link prediction
0.412020
Graph embedding on biomedical networks: methods, applications and evaluations · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
3d genome organization
0.312025
SHICEDO: single-cell Hi-C data enhancement with reduced over-smoothing · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generative adversarial network · 1.7channel-wise attention · 1.7random walk · 0.4neural network · 0.4matrix factorization · 0.4graph embedding · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SHICEDO: single-cell Hi-C data enhancement with reduced over-smoothing
abstract
MOTIVATION: Single-cell Hi-C (scHi-C) technologies have significantly advanced our understanding of the 3D genome organization. However, scHi-C data are often sparse and noisy, leading to substantial computational challenges in downstream analyses. RESULTS: In this study, we introduce SHICEDO, a novel deep-learning model specifically designed to enhance scHi-C contact matrices by imputing missing or sparsely captured chromatin contacts through a generative adversarial framework. SHICEDO leverages the unique structural characteristics of scHi-C matrices to derive customized features that enable effective data enhancement. Additionally, the model incorporates a channel-wise attention mechanism to mitigate the over-smoothing issue commonly associated with scHi-C enhancement methods. Through simulations and real-data applications, we demonstrate that SHICEDO outperforms the state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior quantitative and qualitative results. Moreover, SHICEDO enhances key structural features in scHi-C data, thus enabling more precise delineation of chromatin structures such as A/B compartments, TAD-like domains, and chromatin loops. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SHICEDO is publicly available at https://github.com/wmalab/SHICEDO.
Jingong Huang, Michael Strobel 0002, Yangyang Hu, Tiantian Ye, Tao Jiang 0001, Wenxiu Ma
Bioinform.1
2020 Graph embedding on biomedical networks: methods, applications and evaluations
abstract
MOTIVATION: Graph embedding learning that aims to automatically learn low-dimensional node representations, has drawn increasing attention in recent years. To date, most recent graph embedding methods are evaluated on social and information networks and are not comprehensively studied on biomedical networks under systematic experiments and analyses. On the other hand, for a variety of biomedical network analysis tasks, traditional techniques such as matrix factorization (which can be seen as a type of graph embedding methods) have shown promising results, and hence there is a need to systematically evaluate the more recent graph embedding methods (e.g. random walk-based and neural network-based) in terms of their usability and potential to further the state-of-the-art. RESULTS: We select 11 representative graph embedding methods and conduct a systematic comparison on 3 important biomedical link prediction tasks: drug-disease association (DDA) prediction, drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction, protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction; and 2 node classification tasks: medical term semantic type classification, protein function prediction. Our experimental results demonstrate that the recent graph embedding methods achieve promising results and deserve more attention in the future biomedical graph analysis. Compared with three state-of-the-art methods for DDAs, DDIs and protein function predictions, the recent graph embedding methods achieve competitive performance without using any biological features and the learned embeddings can be treated as complementary representations for the biological features. By summarizing the experimental results, we provide general guidelines for properly selecting graph embedding methods and setting their hyper-parameters for different biomedical tasks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: As part of our contributions in the paper, we develop an easy-to-use Python package with detailed instructions, BioNEV, available at: https://github.com/xiangyue9607/BioNEV, including all source code and datasets, to facilitate studying various graph embedding methods on biomedical tasks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Xiang Yue, Zhen Wang 0041, Jingong Huang, Srinivasan Parthasarathy 0001, Soheil Moosavinasab, Yungui Huang, Simon M. Lin, Wen Zhang 0008, Ping Zhang 0016, Huan Sun 0001
Bioinform.3