Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Petr Karnakov

dblp:242/9602 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network
0.812024
Physics-Regularized Multi-Modal Image Assimilation for Brain Tumor Localization · NeurIPS 2024
Medical and health informatics
radiation therapy planning
0.812024
Physics-Regularized Multi-Modal Image Assimilation for Brain Tumor Localization · NeurIPS 2024
Computer animation and physical simulation
mesh-based simulation
0.812024
Physics-Regularized Multi-Modal Image Assimilation for Brain Tumor Localization · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partial differential equations · 2.3biomechanical modeling · 2.3physics-informed neural networks · 1.5physics-informed neural network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Physics-Regularized Multi-Modal Image Assimilation for Brain Tumor Localization
abstract
Physical models in the form of partial differential equations serve as important priors for many under-constrained problems. One such application is tumor treatment planning, which relies on accurately estimating the spatial distribution of tumor cells within a patient’s anatomy. While medical imaging can detect the bulk of a tumor, it cannot capture the full extent of its spread, as low-concentration tumor cells often remain undetectable, particularly in glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor. Machine learning approaches struggle to estimate the complete tumor cell distribution due to a lack of appropriate training data. Consequently, most existing methods rely on physics-based simulations to generate anatomically and physiologically plausible estimations. However, these approaches face challenges with complex and unknown initial conditions and are constrained by overly rigid physical models. In this work, we introduce a novel method that integrates data-driven and physics-based cost functions, akin to Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). However, our approach parametrizes the solution directly on a dynamic discrete mesh, allowing for the effective modeling of complex biomechanical behaviors. Specifically, we propose a unique discretization scheme that quantifies how well the learned spatiotemporal distributions of tumor and brain tissues adhere to their respective growth and elasticity equations. This quantification acts as a regularization term, offering greater flexibility and improved integration of patient data compared to existing models. We demonstrate enhanced coverage of tumor recurrence areas using real-world data from a patient cohort, highlighting the potential of our method to improve model-driven treatment planning for glioblastoma in clinical practice.
Michal Balcerak, Tamaz Amiranashvili, Jonas Weidner, Petr Karnakov, Johannes C. Paetzold, Ivan Ezhov, Petros Koumoutsakos, Benedikt Wiestler, Bjoern Menze
NeurIPS5