Recent work on large language models (LLMs) has increasingly focused on post-training and alignment with datasets curated to enhance instruction following, world knowledge, and specialized skills. However, most post-training datasets used in leading open- and closed-source LLMs remain inaccessible to the public, with limited information about their construction process. This lack of transparency has motivated the recent development of open-source post-training corpora. While training on these open alternatives can yield performance comparable to that of leading models, systematic comparisons remain challenging due to the significant computational cost of conducting them rigorously at scale, and are therefore largely absent. As a result, it remains unclear how specific samples, task types, or curation strategies influence downstream performance when assessing data quality. In this work, we conduct the first comprehensive side-by-side analysis of two prominent open post-training datasets: Tulu-3-SFT-Mix and SmolTalk. Using the Magpie framework, we annotate each sample with detailed quality metrics, including turn structure (single-turn vs. multi-turn), task category, input quality, and response quality, and we derive statistics that reveal structural and qualitative similarities and differences between the two datasets. Based on these insights, we design a principled curation recipe that produces a new data mixture, TuluTalk, which contains 14% fewer samples than either source dataset while matching or exceeding their performance on key benchmarks. Our findings offer actionable insights for constructing more effective post-training datasets that improve model performance within practical resource limits. To support future research, we publicly release both the annotated source datasets and our curated TuluTalk mixture.

Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training of a model while keeping the training data decentralized and private. However, in Internet of Things systems, inherent heterogeneity in processing power, communication bandwidth, and task size can significantly hinder the efficient training of large models. Such heterogeneity would render vast variations in the training time of clients, lengthening overall training and wasting resources of faster clients. To tackle these heterogeneity challenges, we propose dynamic tiering-based FL (DTFL), a novel system that leverages distributed optimization principles to improve the edge learning performance. Based on clients’ resources, DTFL dynamically offloads part of the global model to the server, alleviating resource constraints on slower clients and speeding up training. By leveraging split learning, DTFL offloads different portions of the global model to clients in different tiers and enables each client to update the models in parallel via local-loss-based training. This helps reduce the computation and communication demand on resource-constrained devices, mitigating the straggler problem. DTFL introduces a dynamic tier scheduler that uses tier profiling to estimate the expected training time of each client based on their historical training time, communication speed, and dataset size. The dynamic tier scheduler assigns clients to suitable tiers to minimize the overall training time in each round. We theoretically prove the convergence properties of DTFL and validate its effectiveness by training large models (ResNet-56 and ResNet-110) across varying numbers of clients (from 10 to 200) using the popular image datasets (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, CINIC-10, and HAM10000) under both I.I.D and non-I.I.D systems. DTFL seamlessly integrates various privacy measures without sacrificing performance. Extensive experimental results show that compared with state-of-the-art FL methods, DTFL can significantly reduce the training time by up to 80% while maintaining the model accuracy.

Addressing issues of copyrighted data in the context of generative models has become an important issue for content creators, publishers, organizations training generative models, and those who deploy generative models for particular applications. Copyright holders want to ensure that they are fairly compensated for their work and users of training data and models do not want to expose themselves to litigation. However, traditional models of bulk-licensing data fit only poorly the context of model training. In this paper, we want to discuss why a traditional data license is not always a good fit, how data is used in the life-cycle of generative models and which impact data has on model output. This can be used as a foundation for a pay-per-(model)use compensation based how data contributes to a model’s output. Having a way to compensate copyright holders in this way reduces risk for model trainers, avoids large investments upfront, and encourage a lively data ecosystem in which the creation and distribution of original work is encouraged and fairly compensated.

Cross-device Federated Learning (FL) enables training machine learning (ML) models on private data that is heterogeneously distributed over many IoT end devices without violating privacy requirements. Clients typically vary significantly in data quality, hardware resources and stability, which results in challenges such as increased training times, higher resource costs, sub-par model performance and biased training. Existing works tend to address each of these challenges in isolation, but overlook how they might impact each other holistically. We perform a first of its kind characterization study that empirically demonstrates how these properties interact with each other to impact important performance metrics such as model error, fairness, resource cost and training time. We then propose a method called HDFL based on our observations, which is the first framework to our knowledge that comprehensively considers the multiple aforementioned important challenges of practical FL systems. We implement HDFL on a real distributed system and evaluate it on multiple benchmark datasets which show that HDFL achieves better Pareto frontier compared to both the state-of-the-practice and state-of-the-art systems with up to 4-10% better model accuracy, 33% improved good-intent fairness, 63% lower cost, and 17% faster training time.

In recent years, the landscape of computing paradigms has witnessed a gradual yet remarkable shift from monolithic computing to distributed and decentralized paradigms such as Internet of Things (IoT), Edge, Fog, Cloud, and Serverless. The frontiers of these computing technologies have been boosted by shift from manually encoded algorithms to Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven autonomous systems for optimum and reliable management of distributed computing resources. Prior work focuses on improving existing systems using AI across a wide range of domains, such as efficient resource provisioning, application deployment, task placement, and service management. This survey reviews the evolution of data-driven AI-augmented technologies and their impact on computing systems. We demystify new techniques and draw key insights in Edge, Fog and Cloud resource management-related uses of AI methods and also look at how AI can innovate traditional applications for enhanced Quality of Service (QoS) in the presence of a continuum of resources. We present the latest trends and impact areas such as optimizing AI models that are deployed on or for computing systems. We layout a roadmap for future research directions in areas such as resource management for QoS optimization and service reliability. Finally, we discuss blue-sky ideas and envision this work as an anchor point for future research on AI-driven computing systems.

In federated learning (FL), clients collectively train a global machine learning model with their own local data. Without sharing sensitive raw data, each client in FL only sends updated weights to consider privacy and security concerns. Most of existing FL works focus mainly on improving model accuracy and training time, but only a few works focus on FL incentive mechanisms. To build a high performance model after FL training, clients need to provide high quality and large amounts of data. However, in real FL scenarios, high-quality clients are reluctant to participate in FL process without reasonable compensation, because clients are self-interested and other clients can be business competitors. Even participation incurs some cost for contributing to the FL model with their local dataset. To address this problem, we propose TIFF, a novel tokenized incentive mechanism, where tokens are used as a means of paying for the services of providing participants and the training infrastructure. Without payment delays, participation can be monetized as both providers and consumers, which promotes continued long-term participation of high-quality data parties. Additionally, paid tokens are reimbursed to each client as consumers according to our newly proposed metrics (such as token reduction ratio and utility improvement ratio), which keeps clients engaged in FL process as consumers. To measure data quality, accuracy is calculated in training without additional overheads. We leverage historical accuracy records and random exploration to select high-utility participants and to prevent overfitting. Results show that TIFF provides more tokens to normal providers by up to 6.9% and less tokens to malicious providers by up to 18.1%, achieving improvement of the final model accuracy by up to 7.4%, compared to the default approach.

Federated learning (FL) is becoming an important distributed machine learning approach that considers privacy and security concerns while training a shared model across various clients with localized data. One of the key challenges in FL is heterogeneity in both hardware resources and local datasets due to the nature of incorporating diverse clients. Given the resource heterogeneity, the availability of participating clients is not stable over time and their resource usage patterns become dynamic. This leads to resource wastage and straggler issues. Additional challenges are introduced due to data heterogeneity, causing model biasness and poor model performance. However, most existing FL systems are not well suited to heterogeneous environments because those approaches are not adaptive to various and dynamically changing resource usage patterns and accuracy trends during training process. To this end, we propose a heterogeneity-aware scheduling which is adaptive to the accuracy trends and various resource usage patterns. Our proposed scheduling provides different scheduling knobs for achieving different goals such as resource-efficient fast training, resource fairness, accuracy fairness, and high model performance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort to mitigate effects of resource and data heterogeneity while providing adaptive scheduling based on dynamically changing resource usage patterns and accuracy trends.

Data heterogeneity has been identified as one of the key features in federated learning but often overlooked in the lens of robustness to adversarial attacks. This paper focuses on characterizing and understanding its impact on backdooring attacks in federated learning through comprehensive experiments using synthetic and the LEAF benchmarks. The initial impression driven by our experimental results suggests that data heterogeneity is the dominant factor in the effectiveness of attacks and it may be a redemption for defending against backdooring as it makes the attack less efficient, more challenging to design effective attack strategies, and the attack result also becomes less predictable. However, with further investigations, we found data heterogeneity is more of a curse than a redemption as the attack effectiveness can be significantly boosted by simply adjusting the client-side backdooring timing. More importantly, data heterogeneity may result in overfitting at the local training of benign clients, which can be utilized by attackers to disguise themselves and fool skewed-feature based defenses. In addition, effective attack strategies can be made by adjusting attack data distribution. Finally, we discuss the potential directions of defending the curses brought by data heterogeneity. The results and lessons learned from our extensive experiments and analysis offer new insights for designing robust federated learning methods and systems.

Federated Learning (FL) enables learning a shared model acrossmany clients without violating the privacy requirements. One of the key attributes in FL is the heterogeneity that exists in both resource and data due to the differences in computation and communication capacity, as well as the quantity and content of data among different clients. We conduct a case study to show that heterogeneity in resource and data has a significant impact on training time and model accuracy in conventional FL systems. To this end, we propose TiFL, a Tier-based Federated Learning System, which divides clients into tiers based on their training performance and selects clients from the same tier in each training round to mitigate the straggler problem caused by heterogeneity in resource anddata quantity. To further tame the heterogeneity caused by non-IID (Independent and Identical Distribution) data and resources, TiFL employs an adaptive tier selection approach to update the tiering on-the-fly based on the observed training performance and accuracy. We prototype TiFL in a FL testbed following Google's FL architecture and evaluate it using the state-of-the-art FL benchmarks. Experimental evaluation shows that TiFL outperforms the conventional FL in various heterogeneous conditions. With the proposed adaptive tier selection policy, we demonstrate that TiFL achieves much faster training performance while achieving the same or better test accuracy across the board.

Machine learning (ML) has been embedded in many Internet of Things (IoT) applications (e.g., smart home and autonomous driving). Yet it is often infeasible to deploy ML models on IoT devices due to resource limitation. Thus, deploying trained ML models in the cloud and providing inference services to IoT devices becomes a plausible solution. To provide low-latency ML serving to massive IoT devices, a natural and promising approach is to use parallelism in computation. However, existing ML systems (e.g., Tensorflow) and cloud ML-serving platforms (e.g., SageMaker) are service-level-objective (SLO) agnostic and rely on users to manually configure the parallelism at both request and operation levels. To address this challenge, we propose a region-based reinforcement learning (RRL)-based scheduling framework for ML serving in IoT applications that can efficiently identify optimal configurations under dynamic workloads. A key observation is that the system performance under similar configurations in a region can be accurately estimated by using the system performance under one of these configurations due to their correlation. We theoretically show that the RRL approach can achieve fast convergence speed at the cost of performance loss. To improve the performance, we propose an adaptive RRL algorithm based on Bayesian optimization to balance the convergence speed and the optimality. The proposed framework is prototyped and evaluated on the Tensorflow Serving system. Extensive experimental results show that the proposed approach can outperform state-of-the-art approaches by finding near-optimal solutions over eight times faster while reducing inference latency up to 88.9% and reducing SLO violation up to 91.6%.

The success of machine learning has prospered Machine-Learning-as-a-Service (MLaaS) - deploying trained machine learning (ML) models in cloud to provide low latency inference services at scale. To meet latency Service-Level-Objective (SLO), judicious parallelization at both request and operation levels is utterly important. However, existing ML systems (e.g., Tensorflow) and cloud ML serving platforms (e.g., SageMaker) are SLO-agnostic and rely on users to manually configure the parallelism. To provide low latency ML serving, this paper proposes a swift machine learning serving scheduling framework with a novel Region-based Reinforcement Learning (RRL) approach. RRL can efficiently identify the optimal parallelism configuration under different workloads by estimating performance of similar configurations with that of the known ones. We both theoretically and experimentally show that the RRL approach can outperform state-of-the-art approaches by finding near optimal solutions over 8 times faster while reducing inference latency up to 79.0% and reducing SLO violation up to 49.9%.