Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sokratia Georgaka

dblp:243/2747 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0078-8083ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation
0.812024
Ouroboros: cross-linking protein expression perturbations and cancer histology imaging with generative-predictive modeling · Bioinform. 2024
Medical and health informatics
computational pathology
0.812024
Ouroboros: cross-linking protein expression perturbations and cancer histology imaging with generative-predictive modeling · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.512021
Non-parametric modelling of temporal and spatial counts data from RNA-seq experiments · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.512021
Non-parametric modelling of temporal and spatial counts data from RNA-seq experiments · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › spatial transcriptomics
spatially variable gene detection
0.512021
Non-parametric modelling of temporal and spatial counts data from RNA-seq experiments · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
spatial transcriptomics
0.512021
Non-parametric modelling of temporal and spatial counts data from RNA-seq experiments · Bioinform. 2021
Medical and health informatics
precision medicine
0.212024
Ouroboros: cross-linking protein expression perturbations and cancer histology imaging with generative-predictive modeling · Bioinform. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

predictive modeling · 1.5generative modeling · 1.5variational bayesian inference · 0.5negative binomial likelihood · 0.5gaussian process regression · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Ouroboros: cross-linking protein expression perturbations and cancer histology imaging with generative-predictive modeling
abstract
SUMMARY: Imagine if we could simultaneously predict spatial protein expression in tissues from their routine Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained images, and create tissue images given protein expression profiles thus enabling virtual simulations of how protein expression alterations impact histology in complex diseases like cancer. Such an approach could lead to more informed diagnostic and therapeutic decisions for precision medicine at lower costs and shorter turnaround times, more detailed insights into underlying disease pathology as well as improvement in predictive and generative performance. In this study, we investigate the intricate correlation between protein expressions obtained from Hyperion mass cytometry and histopathological microstructures in conventional H&E stained glioblastoma (GBM) samples, unveiling morphological patterns and cellular-level spatial alterations associated with protein expression changes. To model these complex relationships, we propose a novel generative-predictive framework called Ouroboros for producing H&E images from protein expressions and simultaneously predicting protein expressions from H&E images. Our comprehensive sample-independent validation over 9920 tissue spots from 4 GBM samples encompassing visual image analysis, quantitative analysis, subspace alignment and perturbation experiments shows that the proposed generative-predictive approach offers significant improvements in predicting protein expression from images in comparison to baseline methods as well as accurate generation of virtual GBM sample images. This proof of concept study can contribute to advancing our understanding of histological responses to protein expression perturbations and lays the foundations for further developments in this area. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Implementation and associated data for the proposed approach are available at the URL: https://github.com/Srijay/Ouroboros.
Srijay Deshpande, Sokratia Georgaka, Michael Haley, Robert Sellers, James Minshull, Jayakrupakar Nallala, Martin Fergie, Nicholas Stone, Nasir M. Rajpoot, Syed Murtuza Baker, Mudassar Iqbal, Kevin Couper, Federico Roncaroli, Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas
Bioinform.2
2021 Non-parametric modelling of temporal and spatial counts data from RNA-seq experiments
abstract
MOTIVATION: The negative binomial distribution has been shown to be a good model for counts data from both bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Gaussian process (GP) regression provides a useful non-parametric approach for modelling temporal or spatial changes in gene expression. However, currently available GP regression methods that implement negative binomial likelihood models do not scale to the increasingly large datasets being produced by single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. RESULTS: The GPcounts package implements GP regression methods for modelling counts data using a negative binomial likelihood function. Computational efficiency is achieved through the use of variational Bayesian inference. The GP function models changes in the mean of the negative binomial likelihood through a logarithmic link function and the dispersion parameter is fitted by maximum likelihood. We validate the method on simulated time course data, showing better performance to identify changes in over-dispersed counts data than methods based on Gaussian or Poisson likelihoods. To demonstrate temporal inference, we apply GPcounts to single-cell RNA-seq datasets after pseudotime and branching inference. To demonstrate spatial inference, we apply GPcounts to data from the mouse olfactory bulb to identify spatially variable genes and compare to two published GP methods. We also provide the option of modelling additional dropout using a zero-inflated negative binomial. Our results show that GPcounts can be used to model temporal and spatial counts data in cases where simpler Gaussian and Poisson likelihoods are unrealistic. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GPcounts is implemented using the GPflow library in Python and is available at https://github.com/ManchesterBioinference/GPcounts along with the data, code and notebooks required to reproduce the results presented here. The version used for this paper is archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5027066. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Nuha Bintayyash, Sokratia Georgaka, S. T. John, Sumon Ahmed, Alexis Boukouvalas, James Hensman, Magnus Rattray
Bioinform.2