EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joost van Amersfoort
dblp:243/3616
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 39% Efficient and distributed learning · 34% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
1.2 | 3 | 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple Baseline · CVPR 2023 Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural Network · ICML 2020 Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple Baseline · CVPR 2023 Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural Network · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › experimental design › bayesian experimental design
bayesian active learning |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational Data · NeurIPS 2021 BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple Baseline · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › DNN pruning
pruning at initialization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
causal inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › black-box optimization
batch acquisition |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning › deep active learning
deep bayesian active learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
spectral normalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple Baseline · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
information-theoretic acquisition function |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information theory · 1.0bayesian acquisition function · 1.0spectral normalization · 0.7residual connections · 0.7gaussian discriminant analysis · 0.7meta-gradient · 0.6gradient penalty · 0.4centroid updating · 0.4RBF network · 0.4dynamic programming · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A New Simple BaselineabstractReliable uncertainty from deterministic single-forward pass models is sought after because conventional methods of uncertainty quantification are computationally expensive. We take two complex single-forward-pass uncertainty approaches, DUQ and SNGP, and examine whether they mainly rely on a well-regularized feature space. Crucially, without using their more complex methods for estimating uncertainty, we find that a single softmax neural net with such a regularized feature-space, achieved via residual connections and spectral normalization, outperforms DUQ and SNGP's epistemic uncertainty predictions using simple Gaussian Discriminant Analysis post-training as a separate feature-space density estimator-without fine-tuning on OoD data, feature ensembling, or input pre-procressing. Our conceptually simple Deep Deterministic Uncertainty (DDU) baseline can also be used to disentangle aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty and performs as well as Deep Ensembles, the state-of-the art for uncertainty prediction, on several OoD bench-marks (CIFAR-10/100 vs SVHN/Tiny-ImageNet, ImageNet vs ImageNet-O), active learning settings across different model architectures, as well as in large scale vision tasks like semantic segmentation, while being computationally cheaper. Jishnu Mukhoti, Andreas Kirsch 0002, Joost van Amersfoort, Philip Torr 0001, Yarin Gal |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2022 | Prospect Pruning: Finding Trainable Weights at Initialization using Meta-Gradients
Milad Alizadeh, Shyam A. Tailor, Luisa M. Zintgraf, Joost van Amersfoort, Sebastian Farquhar, Nicholas D. Lane, Yarin Gal |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2021 | Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational DataabstractEstimating personalized treatment effects from high-dimensional observational data is essential in situations where experimental designs are infeasible, unethical, or expensive. Existing approaches rely on fitting deep models on outcomes observed for treated and control populations. However, when measuring individual outcomes is costly, as is the case of a tumor biopsy, a sample-efficient strategy for acquiring each result is required. Deep Bayesian active learning provides a framework for efficient data acquisition by selecting points with high uncertainty. However, existing methods bias training data acquisition towards regions of non-overlapping support between the treated and control populations. These are not sample-efficient because the treatment effect is not identifiable in such regions. We introduce causal, Bayesian acquisition functions grounded in information theory that bias data acquisition towards regions with overlapping support to maximize sample efficiency for learning personalized treatment effects. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed acquisition strategies on synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets IHDP and CMNIST and their extensions, which aim to simulate common dataset biases and pathologies. Andrew Jesson, Panagiotis Tigas, Joost van Amersfoort, Andreas Kirsch 0002, Uri Shalit, Yarin Gal |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural NetworkabstractWe propose a method for training a deterministic deep model that can find and reject out of distribution data points at test time with a single forward pass. Our approach, deterministic uncertainty quantification (DUQ), builds upon ideas of RBF networks. We scale training in these with a novel loss function and centroid updating scheme and match the accuracy of softmax models. By enforcing detectability of changes in the input using a gradient penalty, we are able to reliably detect out of distribution data. Our uncertainty quantification scales well to large datasets, and using a single model, we improve upon or match Deep Ensembles in out of distribution detection on notable difficult dataset pairs such as FashionMNIST vs. MNIST, and CIFAR-10 vs. SVHN. Joost van Amersfoort, Lewis Smith, Yee Whye Teh, Yarin Gal |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active LearningabstractWe develop BatchBALD, a tractable approximation to the mutual information between a batch of points and model parameters, which we use as an acquisition function to select multiple informative points jointly for the task of deep Bayesian active learning. BatchBALD is a greedy linear-time $1 - \nicefrac{1}{e}$-approximate algorithm amenable to dynamic programming and efficient caching. We compare BatchBALD to the commonly used approach for batch data acquisition and find that the current approach acquires similar and redundant points, sometimes performing worse than randomly acquiring data. We finish by showing that, using BatchBALD to consider dependencies within an acquisition batch, we achieve new state of the art performance on standard benchmarks, providing substantial data efficiency improvements in batch acquisition. Andreas Kirsch 0002, Joost van Amersfoort, Yarin Gal |
NeurIPS | 2 |