Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tobias Götz
dblp:243/4804
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 67% Graph data management · 33% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization › query execution › relational operators
set intersection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GraphMatch: Subgraph Query Processing on Steroids · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Graph data management › graph query processing
subgraph query processing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GraphMatch: Subgraph Query Processing on Steroids · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Query processing and optimization › join processing › join algorithms
worst-case optimal join |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GraphMatch: Subgraph Query Processing on Steroids · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
worst-case optimal join · 1.7hardware parallelism · 1.7dataflow architecture · 0.9data flow architecture · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | GraphMatch: Subgraph Query Processing on SteroidsabstractRecently, graphs are becoming increasingly interesting in the context of large language models and as overlays for commercial databases. Subgraph query processing is an especially challenging workload for graph analysis that is bottlenecked by slow set intersection performance on CPUs. Previous work has shown the viability of utilizing hardware acceleration for related domains like graph and relational join processing. We propose GraphMatch, a hardware-accelerated subgraph query processing system based on worst-case optimal joins (WCOJ). For efficient processing of various data and query graphs, we propose a novel set intersection algorithm, called MaxStep, that leverages hardware parallelism. GraphMatch combines MaxStep operators in a data flow architecture which efficiently solves multi-set intersections in subgraph query processing, superior to CPU-based approaches. GraphMatch achieves an average speedup of over 6.98x and 17.08x, compared to the state-of-the-art WCOJ-based systems GraphFlow and RapidMatch, respectively. On labeled graphs, GraphMatch outperforms the fastest subgraph query processing accelerator FAST by orders of magnitude. Jonas Dann, Tobias Götz, Daniel Ritter 0001, Jana Giceva, Holger Fröning, Gustavo Alonso |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 2 |
| 2022 | ArrayQL Integration into Code-Generating Database Systems
Maximilian E. Schüle, Tobias Götz, Alfons Kemper, Thomas Neumann 0001 |
EDBT | 2 |
| 2021 | Facilitating Mixed Reality Public Participation for Modern Construction Projects: Guiding Project Planners with a Configurator
Lena Theodora Schramm, Anuja Hariharan, Tobias Götz, Jonas Fegert, Andreas Schmidt 0007 |
ArtsIT | 3 |
| 2021 | ArrayQL for Linear Algebra within UmbraabstractArray database systems offer a declarative language for array-based access on multidimensional data. This study explains the integration of ArrayQL inside a relational database system, either addressable through a separate query interface or integrated into SQL as user-defined functions. With a relational database system as the target, we inherit the benefits such as query optimisation and multi-version concurrency control by design. Apart from SQL, having another query language allows processing the data without extraction or transformation out of its relational form. This is possible as we work on a relational array representation, for which we translate each ArrayQL operator into relational algebra. In our evaluation, ArrayQL within Umbra computes matrix operations faster than state of the art database extensions. Maximilian E. Schüle, Tobias Götz, Alfons Kemper, Thomas Neumann 0001 |
SSDBM | 2 |