Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrés F. Duque
dblp:243/5930
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geometry Regularized Autoencoders · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geometry Regularized Autoencoders · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
out-of-sample extension |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Geometry Regularized Autoencoders · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
manifold learning · 0.7kernel methods · 0.7autoencoder · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Diffusion Transport Alignment
Andrés F. Duque, Guy Wolf, Kevin R. Moon |
IDA | 1 |
| 2023 | Geometry Regularized AutoencodersabstractA fundamental task in data exploration is to extract low dimensional representations that capture intrinsic geometry in data, especially for faithfully visualizing data in two or three dimensions. Common approaches use kernel methods for manifold learning. However, these methods typically only provide an embedding of the input data and cannot extend naturally to new data points. Autoencoders have also become popular for representation learning. While they naturally compute feature extractors that are extendable to new data and invertible (i.e., reconstructing original features from latent representation), they often fail at representing the intrinsic data geometry compared to kernel-based manifold learning. We present a new method for integrating both approaches by incorporating a geometric regularization term in the bottleneck of the autoencoder. This regularization encourages the learned latent representation to follow the intrinsic data geometry, similar to manifold learning algorithms, while still enabling faithful extension to new data and preserving invertibility. We compare our approach to autoencoder models for manifold learning to provide qualitative and quantitative evidence of our advantages in preserving intrinsic structure, out of sample extension, and reconstruction. Our method is easily implemented for big-data applications, whereas other methods are limited in this regard. Andrés F. Duque, Sacha Morin, Guy Wolf, Kevin R. Moon |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2020 | Extendable and invertible manifold learning with geometry regularized autoencodersabstractA fundamental task in data exploration is to extract simplified low dimensional representations that capture intrinsic geometry in data, especially for faithfully visualizing data in two or three dimensions. Common approaches to this task use kernel methods for manifold learning. However, these methods typically only provide an embedding of fixed input data and cannot extend to new data points. Autoencoders have also recently become popular for representation learning. But while they naturally compute feature extractors that are both extendable to new data and invertible (i.e., reconstructing original features from latent representation), they have limited capabilities to follow global intrinsic geometry compared to kernel-based manifold learning. We present a new method for integrating both approaches by incorporating a geometric regularization term in the bottleneck of the autoencoder. Our regularization, based on the diffusion potential distances from the recently-proposed PHATE visualization method, encourages the learned latent representation to follow intrinsic data geometry, similar to manifold learning algorithms, while still enabling faithful extension to new data and reconstruction of data in the original feature space from latent coordinates. We compare our approach with leading kernel methods and autoencoder models for manifold learning to provide qualitative and quantitative evidence of our advantages in preserving intrinsic structure, out of sample extension, and reconstruction. Our method is easily implemented for big-data applications, whereas other methods are limited in this regard. Andrés F. Duque, Sacha Morin, Guy Wolf, Kevin R. Moon |
IEEE BigData | 1 |