Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Laura Gustafson
dblp:243/6934
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 21% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% Image recognition and object detection · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Exploring Why Object Recognition Performance Degrades Across Income Levels and Geographies with Factor Annotations · NeurIPS 2023 FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmark · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Segment Anything · ICCV 2023 Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Models · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video object segmentation
promptable video segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
prompt-based segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
video segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Exploring Why Object Recognition Performance Degrades Across Income Levels and Geographies with Factor Annotations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Exploring Why Object Recognition Performance Degrades Across Income Levels and Geographies with Factor Annotations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Segment Anything · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Models · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual recognition |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Models · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
weakly supervised pre-training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception Models · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Growing Action Spaces · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Growing Action Spaces · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › transfer learning in reinforcement learning
value function transfer |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Growing Action Spaces · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data-efficient learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
physical reasoning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Exploring Why Object Recognition Performance Degrades Across Income Levels and Geographies with Factor Annotations · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › visual representation learning
vision foundation model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Segment Anything · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Growing Action Spaces · ICML 2020 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
promptable model · 1.3data collection loop · 1.3transformer · 0.9streaming memory · 0.9model vulnerability analysis · 0.7intersectional analysis · 0.7factor annotation · 0.7self-supervised learning · 0.6residual network · 0.6hashtag supervision · 0.6reinforcement learning · 0.4model-based learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and VideosabstractWe present Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2), a foundation model towards solving promptable visual segmentation in images and videos. We build a data engine, which improves model and data via user interaction, to collect the largest video segmentation dataset to date. Our model is a simple transformer architecture with streaming memory for real-time video processing. SAM 2 trained on our data provides strong performance across a wide range of tasks. In video segmentation, we observe better accuracy, using 3x fewer interactions than prior approaches. In image segmentation, our model is more accurate and 6x faster than the Segment Anything Model (SAM). We believe that our data, model, and insights will serve as a significant milestone for video segmentation and related perception tasks. We are releasing our main model, the dataset, an interactive demo and code. Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma 0005, Haitham Khedr, Roman Rädle, Chloé Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Eric Mintun, Junting Pan, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Nicolas Carion, Chao-Yuan Wu, Ross B. Girshick, Piotr Dollár, Christoph Feichtenhofer |
ICLR | 10 |
| 2023 | FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation BenchmarkabstractComputer vision models have known performance disparities across attributes such as gender and skin tone. This means during tasks such as classification and detection, model performance differs for certain classes based on the demographics of the people in the image. These disparities have been shown to exist, but until now there has not been a unified approach to measure these differences for common use-cases of computer vision models. We present a new benchmark named FACET (FAirness in Computer Vision EvaluaTion), a large, publicly available evaluation set of 32k images for some of the most common vision tasks - image classification, object detection and segmentation. For every image in FACET, we hired expert reviewers to manually annotate person-related attributes such as perceived skin tone and hair type, manually draw bounding boxes and label fine-grained person-related classes such as disk jockey or guitarist. In addition, we use FACET to benchmark state-of-the-art vision models and present a deeper understanding of potential performance disparities and challenges across sensitive demographic attributes. With the exhaustive annotations collected, we probe models using single demographics attributes as well as multiple attributes using an intersectional approach (e.g. hair color and perceived skin tone). Our results show that classification, detection, segmentation, and visual grounding models exhibit performance disparities across demographic attributes and intersections of attributes. These harms suggest that not all people represented in datasets receive fair and equitable treatment in these vision tasks. We hope current and future results using our benchmark will contribute to fairer, more robust vision models. FACET is available publicly at https://facet.metademolab.com. Laura Gustafson, Chloé Rolland, Nikhila Ravi, Quentin Duval, Aaron Adcock, Cheng-Yang Fu, Melissa Hall, Candace Ross |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2023 | Segment AnythingabstractWe introduce the Segment Anything (SA) project: a new task, model, and dataset for image segmentation. Using our efficient model in a data collection loop, we built the largest segmentation dataset to date (by far), with over 1 billion masks on 11M licensed and privacy respecting images. The model is designed and trained to be promptable, so it can transfer zero-shot to new image distributions and tasks. We evaluate its capabilities on numerous tasks and find that its zero-shot performance is impressive – often competitive with or even superior to prior fully supervised results. We are releasing the Segment Anything Model (SAM) and corresponding dataset (SA-1B) of 1B masks and 11M images at segment-anything.com to foster research into foundation models for computer vision. We recommend reading the full paper at: arxiv.org/abs/2304.02643. Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloé Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C. Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, Piotr Dollár, Ross B. Girshick |
ICCV | 6 |
| 2023 | Exploring Why Object Recognition Performance Degrades Across Income Levels and Geographies with Factor AnnotationsabstractDespite impressive advances in object-recognition, deep learning systems’ performance degrades significantly across geographies and lower income levels---raising pressing concerns of inequity. Addressing such performance gaps remains a challenge, as little is understood about why performance degrades across incomes or geographies.We take a step in this direction by annotating images from Dollar Street, a popular benchmark of geographically and economically diverse images, labeling each image with factors such as color, shape, and background. These annotations unlock a new granular view into how objects differ across incomes/regions. We then use these object differences to pinpoint model vulnerabilities across incomes and regions.We study a range of modern vision models, finding that performance disparities are most associated with differences in texture, occlusion, and images with darker lighting.We illustrate how insights from our factor labels can surface mitigations to improve models' performance disparities.As an example, we show that mitigating a model's vulnerability to texture can improve performance on the lower income level.We release all the factor annotations along with an interactive dashboardto facilitate research into more equitable vision systems. Laura Gustafson, Megan Richards, Melissa Hall, Caner Hazirbas, Diane Bouchacourt, Mark Ibrahim |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Revisiting Weakly Supervised Pre-Training of Visual Perception ModelsabstractModel pre-training is a cornerstone of modern visual recognition systems. Although fully supervised pre-training on datasets like ImageNet is still the de-facto standard, recent studies suggest that large-scale weakly supervised pretraining can outperform fully supervised approaches. This paper revisits weakly-supervised pre-training of models using hashtag supervision with modern versions of residual networks and the largest-ever dataset of images and corresponding hashtags. We study the performance of the resulting models in various transfer-learning settings including zero-shot transfer. We also compare our models with those obtained via large-scale self-supervised learning. We find our weakly-supervised models to be very competitive across all settings, and find they substantially outperform their self-supervised counterparts. We also include an investigation into whether our models learned potentially troubling associations or stereotypes. Overall, our results provide a compelling argument for the use of weakly supervised learning in the development of visual recognition systems. Our models, Supervised Weakly through hashtAGs (SWAG), are available publicly. Mannat Singh, Laura Gustafson, Aaron Adcock, Vinicius de Freitas Reis, Bugra Gedik, Raj Prateek Kosaraju, Dhruv Mahajan 0001, Ross B. Girshick, Piotr Dollár, Laurens van der Maaten |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2020 | Growing Action SpacesabstractIn complex tasks, such as those with large combinatorial action spaces, random exploration may be too inefficient to achieve meaningful learning progress. In this work, we use a curriculum of progressively growing action spaces to accelerate learning. We assume the environment is out of our control, but that the agent may set an internal curriculum by initially restricting its action space. Our approach uses off-policy reinforcement learning to estimate optimal value functions for multiple action spaces simultaneously and efficiently transfers data, value estimates, and state representations from restricted action spaces to the full task. We show the efficacy of our approach in proof-of-concept control tasks and on challenging large-scale StarCraft micromanagement tasks with large, multi-agent action spaces. Gregory Farquhar, Laura Gustafson, Zeming Lin, Shimon Whiteson, Nicolas Usunier, Gabriel Synnaeve |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical ReasoningabstractUnderstanding and reasoning about physics is an important ability of intelligent agents. We develop the PHYRE benchmark for physical reasoning that contains a set of simple classical mechanics puzzles in a 2D physical environment. The benchmark is designed to encourage the development of learning algorithms that are sample-efficient and generalize well across puzzles. We test several modern learning algorithms on PHYRE and find that these algorithms fall short in solving the puzzles efficiently. We expect that PHYRE will encourage the development of novel sample-efficient agents that learn efficient but useful models of physics. For code and to play PHYRE for yourself, please visit https://player.phyre.ai. Anton Bakhtin, Laurens van der Maaten, Justin Johnson 0001, Laura Gustafson, Ross B. Girshick |
NeurIPS | 4 |