Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
March Boedihardjo
dblp:243/7233 · also March T. Boedihardjo
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4969-0586ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 71% Computational complexity · 24% Information theory · 5% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › finite-sample analysis
finite-sample guarantees |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical guarantees |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport › wasserstein distance
sliced wasserstein distance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein distance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Privacy of Synthetic Data: A Statistical Framework · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › noise addition
laplace mechanism |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Privacy of Synthetic Data: A Statistical Framework · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
synthetic data generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Privacy of Synthetic Data: A Statistical Framework · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semidefinite relaxation · 1.7kernel max-sliced wasserstein distance · 1.7dimensionality reduction · 1.7rényi condition number · 1.3laplacian mechanism · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein DistancesabstractOptimal transport has been very successful for various machine learning tasks; however, it is known to suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Hence, dimensionality reduction is desirable when applied to high-dimensional data with low-dimensional structures. The kernel max-sliced (KMS) Wasserstein distance is developed for this purpose by finding an optimal nonlinear mapping that reduces data into $1$ dimension before computing the Wasserstein distance. However, its theoretical properties have not yet been fully developed. In this paper, we provide sharp finite-sample guarantees under milder technical assumptions compared with state-of-the-art for the KMS $p$-Wasserstein distance between two empirical distributions with $n$ samples for general $p\in[1,\infty)$. Algorithm-wise, we show that computing the KMS $2$-Wasserstein distance is NP-hard, and then we further propose a semidefinite relaxation (SDR) formulation (which can be solved efficiently in polynomial time) and provide a relaxation gap for the obtained solution. We provide numerical examples to demonstrate the good performance of our scheme for high-dimensional two-sample testing. Jie Wang 0049, March Boedihardjo, Yao Xie 0002 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Certified private data release for sparse Lipschitz functionsabstractAs machine learning has become more relevant for everyday applications, a natural requirement is the protection of the privacy of the training data. When the relevant learning questions are unknown in advance, or hyper-parameter tuning plays a central role, one solution is to release a differentially private synthetic data set that leads to similar conclusions as the original training data. In this work, we introduce an algorithm that enjoys fast rates for the utility loss for sparse Lipschitz queries. Furthermore, we show how to obtain a certificate for the utility loss for a large class of algorithms. Konstantin Donhauser, Johan Lokna, Amartya Sanyal, March Boedihardjo, Robert Hönig, Fanny Yang |
AISTATS | 4 |
| 2023 | Privacy of Synthetic Data: A Statistical FrameworkabstractPrivacy-preserving data analysis is emerging as a challenging problem with far-reaching impact. In particular, synthetic data are a promising concept toward solving the aporetic conflict between data privacy and data sharing. Yet, it is known that accurately generating private, synthetic data of certain kinds is NP-hard. We develop a statistical framework for differentially private synthetic data, which enables us to circumvent the computational hardness of the problem. We consider the true data as a random sample drawn from a population$\Omega $according to some unknown density. We then replace$\Omega $by a much smaller random subset$\Omega ^{\ast}$, which we sample according to some known density. We generate synthetic data on the reduced space$\Omega ^{\ast}$by fitting the specified linear statistics obtained from the true data. To ensure privacy we use the common Laplacian mechanism. Employing the concept of Rényi condition number, which measures how well the sampling distribution is correlated with the population distribution, we derive explicit bounds on the privacy and accuracy provided by the proposed method. March Boedihardjo, Thomas Strohmer, Roman Vershynin |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |