Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

March Boedihardjo

dblp:243/7233 · also March T. Boedihardjo · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4969-0586ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 71% Computational complexity · 24% Information theory · 5%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › finite-sample analysis
finite-sample guarantees
0.912025
Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical guarantees
0.912025
Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.912025
Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport › wasserstein distance
sliced wasserstein distance
0.912025
Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein distance
0.912025
Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances · ICML 2025
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.712023
Privacy of Synthetic Data: A Statistical Framework · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › noise addition
laplace mechanism
0.712023
Privacy of Synthetic Data: A Statistical Framework · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
synthetic data generation
0.712023
Privacy of Synthetic Data: A Statistical Framework · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semidefinite relaxation · 1.7kernel max-sliced wasserstein distance · 1.7dimensionality reduction · 1.7rényi condition number · 1.3laplacian mechanism · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances
abstract
Optimal transport has been very successful for various machine learning tasks; however, it is known to suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Hence, dimensionality reduction is desirable when applied to high-dimensional data with low-dimensional structures. The kernel max-sliced (KMS) Wasserstein distance is developed for this purpose by finding an optimal nonlinear mapping that reduces data into $1$ dimension before computing the Wasserstein distance. However, its theoretical properties have not yet been fully developed. In this paper, we provide sharp finite-sample guarantees under milder technical assumptions compared with state-of-the-art for the KMS $p$-Wasserstein distance between two empirical distributions with $n$ samples for general $p\in[1,\infty)$. Algorithm-wise, we show that computing the KMS $2$-Wasserstein distance is NP-hard, and then we further propose a semidefinite relaxation (SDR) formulation (which can be solved efficiently in polynomial time) and provide a relaxation gap for the obtained solution. We provide numerical examples to demonstrate the good performance of our scheme for high-dimensional two-sample testing.
Jie Wang 0049, March Boedihardjo, Yao Xie 0002
ICML2
2024 Certified private data release for sparse Lipschitz functions
abstract
As machine learning has become more relevant for everyday applications, a natural requirement is the protection of the privacy of the training data. When the relevant learning questions are unknown in advance, or hyper-parameter tuning plays a central role, one solution is to release a differentially private synthetic data set that leads to similar conclusions as the original training data. In this work, we introduce an algorithm that enjoys fast rates for the utility loss for sparse Lipschitz queries. Furthermore, we show how to obtain a certificate for the utility loss for a large class of algorithms.
Konstantin Donhauser, Johan Lokna, Amartya Sanyal, March Boedihardjo, Robert Hönig, Fanny Yang
AISTATS4
2023 Privacy of Synthetic Data: A Statistical Framework
abstract
Privacy-preserving data analysis is emerging as a challenging problem with far-reaching impact. In particular, synthetic data are a promising concept toward solving the aporetic conflict between data privacy and data sharing. Yet, it is known that accurately generating private, synthetic data of certain kinds is NP-hard. We develop a statistical framework for differentially private synthetic data, which enables us to circumvent the computational hardness of the problem. We consider the true data as a random sample drawn from a population$\Omega $according to some unknown density. We then replace$\Omega $by a much smaller random subset$\Omega ^{\ast}$, which we sample according to some known density. We generate synthetic data on the reduced space$\Omega ^{\ast}$by fitting the specified linear statistics obtained from the true data. To ensure privacy we use the common Laplacian mechanism. Employing the concept of Rényi condition number, which measures how well the sampling distribution is correlated with the population distribution, we derive explicit bounds on the privacy and accuracy provided by the proposed method.
March Boedihardjo, Thomas Strohmer, Roman Vershynin
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1